His is linked to the difference between a passionate goal and a dutiful one. Lincoln spoke out against vigilante justice during his Lyceum Address because there wouldn’t be a plethora of highly trained ninjas with a keen eye for the acquiring justice at all costs. It would in reality be utter mayhem and too many people would be getting themselves hurt. This is why Lincoln wants the nation to resist passions that let’s say Batman would have, and instead take up duties that a good citizen or statesman would undergo. “Passion has helped us; but can do so no more. It will in future be our enemy. Reason, cold, calculating, unimpassioned reason, must furnish all the materials for our future support and defence” (Basler, p.84) It is this exact reverence for the laws and emphasis on morality in a person’s upbringing and character to which Lincoln attributes the flourishing of a single unified nation. He would be against any Batman ideas because those kinds of efforts have too many chances to fail and hurt innocent …show more content…
The distinction between some people designated to function without bias under the law versus others simply complying with any enforcements of the law are directly linked to healthy governmental structures for Lincoln. “Let those materials be moulded into general intelligence, sound morality, and in particular, a reverence for the constitution and laws: and, that we improved to the last; that we remained free to the last; that we revered his name to the last; that, during his long sleep, we permitted no hostile foot to pass over or desecrate his resting place; shall be that which to learn the last trump shall awaken our WASHINGTON” (Basler,