Lutz Double Speak Essay

In the essay, “The World of Doublespeak” by William Lutz, Lutz introduces the readers to a language called doublespeak. According to Lutz doublespeak is, “the language that makes the rough seem favorable, the negative appear positive, the unpleasant appear attractive or at least seem tolerable” (Lutz, 337). The language of doublespeak is intended to deceive the truth and to miscommunicate. Lutz describes to the readers four types of doublespeak, which include, euphemism, jargon, gobbledygook and inflated language. According to Lutz, there are countless dangers with doublespeak. Several problems, since this language are used by politicians, government and businesses to mislead people. Double speak alters people’s perception of reality. It holds back from the knowledge people need to recognize to advance in society and culture. Doublespeak is unquestionably cruddy news for the reason that the audiences will not consider it is awful news since they used the language where imperfect seems positive. The first type of doublespeak Lutz mentions is a euphemism, which is described as a phrase used to avoid a harsh reality. This type of doublespeak is considered dangerous being a result of avoiding the true reality. An …show more content…
Gobbledygook may sound impressive, but when it is analyzed more, it's just a pile of nonsense. Numerous of people use this doublespeak to make themselves look like they realize what they are talking about and since they are using big words, the audience believes what they are saying is truly meaning. For example, Donald Trump constantly says a bunch of nonsense in his speeches, but since he has a serious look and speaks with confidence, the audience feel what he says is meaningful. Gobbledygook is truly dangerous because do the people actually recognize what the other person is talking about? How can people in a society vote for a president when they’re just saying a bunch of nonsense. Using