This is also why the privileging of loyalty over betrayal is problematic; loyalties in the play can be flipped to be seen as betrayals, and betrayals as loyalties. The notion of one being more favorable than the other is therefore arbitrary, as neither betrayals nor loyalties among key players have favorable outcomes, nor do they appear to be fixed as one or the other. Hamlet even says, “There is/ nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it/ so” (2.2.268-71), suggesting that no fixed meaning can be assigned to something; thoughts and beliefs come from our own perceptions and ideologies. In the end, the instability of the binary opposition is too great to truly favor one opposition over another, as they both are dependent on the ideologies which create
This is also why the privileging of loyalty over betrayal is problematic; loyalties in the play can be flipped to be seen as betrayals, and betrayals as loyalties. The notion of one being more favorable than the other is therefore arbitrary, as neither betrayals nor loyalties among key players have favorable outcomes, nor do they appear to be fixed as one or the other. Hamlet even says, “There is/ nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it/ so” (2.2.268-71), suggesting that no fixed meaning can be assigned to something; thoughts and beliefs come from our own perceptions and ideologies. In the end, the instability of the binary opposition is too great to truly favor one opposition over another, as they both are dependent on the ideologies which create