Loyalist Vs Patriots Analysis

Great Essays
When is it a good time to become an independent nation? In 1607, the first colony was founded and settled by Englishmen. Since then, the colonists have been under the rule of the British king, receiving help and following the laws that are enforced. After years of being an English colony, people started disagreeing with how they were being treated. These people, also known as the patriots, started to rebel and try to get their king to notice what they wanted to get across. In the meantime, another group of people, known as the loyalist, remained loyal to their kind. They did not see a reason to rebel to their mother country. In the colonies there were now two groups, the loyalist and the patriots. Those two groups had two different views on …show more content…
The Americans had acted in a way that deserved a punishment. For example, the Stamp Act was because Americans were avoiding the taxes by smuggling goods (Frazer 37). In addition, the Stamp Act “applied to all the English New World colonies” (Frazer 38). Not only were they punished for smuggling goods, but also because they reacted by using violence. According to Frazer, “They ransacked the house of the governor of Massachusetts and set it on fire and they surrounded the house of Jared Ingersoll, a Congregationalist minister, and threatened his life until he agreed to resign as a tax collector.” (37). The patriots would use violence to get revenge. Those were not the only times they used violence. There were times when the patriots would attack a loyalist. Edmund Fanning for example was a loyalist who had acquired so much hate. According to William S. Powell, Fanning was “grabbed by his heels, and pulled down the stairs, banging his head on each step”. Also, “the home of another official was entered and his personal possessions were thrown out the window” (Powell). Another punishment was the captivity. Soldiers would hold people captive for betraying England, yet the actual punishment that is applied when betrayal was much worse, but England decided to not send them to their deaths. Dzurec states “as without punishment of death ‘captivity has nothing dreadful in it’” (435). Just like how the loyalists thought, England had a reason behind every

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Between 1765 and 1775 britain gave the colonist many reasons to revolt and vice versa. For example, the british implemented the townshend act making colonist pay taxes for imported goods such as glass, lead, paints, paper and tea. Later “Customs racketeering, in which greedy customs officials seized ships and their goods whether or not evidence of smuggling existed, led to widespread violence and to the British occupation of Boston in 1768” (reasons, 1) when the british soldiers arrived in boston many of the colonist disagreed with them so tensions led to the boston massacre killing five colonist. In response to the boston massacre the colonist did the boston tea party “The Boston Tea Party of 1773 and the punitive British response solidified…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Dbq Analysis

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The British soldiers were the aggressors because they terrified the Patriot by antagonizing them, terrifying innocent people, and killing the ones that were not armed. It displays how the british had no mercy for the Patriots. The British did what was necessary to make sure that they got what they came here to do. The Patriots also did some cruel actions towards the British. Everything that the British and Patriots had done, the British did far more worse force than the Patriots.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Continental Congress Dbq

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Not all American colonists supported the war; those who were in favor of British rule were known as loyalists or Tories. The British Army attempted to organize the loyalists and offered incentives such as freedom to colonial slaves in return for service. To remedy this, the Continental Congress passed the Tory Act, which declared that loyalists who worked against the colonial cause should be disarmed and that any who were dangerous should be kept in safe custody. The Continental Congress was clear that the loyalists should not be treated poorly, but anti-loyalist sentiment was extremely high. In some areas, suspected loyalists were imprisoned, physically abused or killed.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the beginning of the French and Indian War, Britain and the American Colonies had a good relationship, Britain ruled over the Colonies but the colonies did not mind because Britain provided many lucrative trading opportunities for the American Colonies. The American colonies were for the most part only benefitting from Britain, that is until the end of the French and Indian war when Parliament passed many taxes and acts. After Britain began imposing unfair treaties and taxes some of the American Colonists began to not appreciate Britain as much as before. The American Colonies started to grow apart from Britain because the colonists believed in the idea of no taxation without representation. The colonists were outraged with the Sugar Act, Quartering Act, the Stamp Act and the…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the beginning, movies have always been extremely influential on society. They can be captivating, emotional, or even historical. The Patriot is just one of the many examples of a historical film. Mel Gibson plays Benjamin Martin, a simple man of South Carolina, who joins the American Revolution when the British attempt to take his farm away from him. Benjamin and his son Gabriel rally together in a militia to protect their land from the British.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As well as the unwillingness to consent to England’s tyranny, laws and acts enforced upon the colonists only added to the already large resentment and feelings of rebellion among the people. For instance, Document 2, excerpts from ‘Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania’ by John Dickinson, illustrates the stamp act as “unconstitutional, and . . . destructive to the liberty of theses colonies.” The Stamp Act was conveyed as an unjust law and enforcement against the colonists, being that they had no representation within the British parliament.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While many people sided with the patriots siding with the British were the most reasonable idea for loyalist. All the while the year of 1764 April 5, the British put a tax on everything that was being imported to get them out of debt, because protected the…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    British Missteps Analysis

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1764 the Sugar Act was enacted to raise tax revenue in the colonies for England and it increased the duty on sugar imported from the West Indies. However, the colonists were accustomed to having their own colonial legislatures creating taxes, so they fought back when Britain tried to control them. In 1765 the Stamp Act mandated the use of stamps on certain types of commercial and legal documents. The purpose of this tax was to raise revenue for the new military force, but the colonists did not want to pay for an army they did not ask for. The Townshend Tea Tax placed an import duty on glass, lead, paper, paint, and tea in 1767.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriots Vs Loyalists

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Patriots didn’t seem to take it that way. Do you think you should betray a side that allowed you to colonize in the first place? In my opinion, I support the loyalists because they were trying to protect the patriots, passed acts for good reasons, and without Great Britain’s authorization the colonies would’ve never existed. Everyone has a different point of view towards something. Many people may not agree with my perspective towards the patriots and loyalists.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beginning in the middle of 1765, the Sons of Liberty were a secret political organization made up of colonial patriots. The secret organization was founded by Samuel Adams and John Hancock inside of Boston, Massachusetts. The Sons of Liberty was organized as a means to protest the recent tax on anything printed on paper, known as the Stamp Act. The Stamp Act had been pressed upon American’s without the consent of the colonial legislature. Because of this, several colonists wanted to rebel against Britain and her unjust rule over the colonies.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, the Loyalists were people who remained loyal to the King. They thought that rebelling against their British sovereign, because of their unfair taxes and rights, was not worth it. They were called different things, like Tories, Royalists, and Kingsmen and one of the ways that the British were able to sign people on were by offering freedom to the African American slaves. The British were willing to grant freedom to the African American slaves who helped support their cause.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lyles 1Kayla LylesMr. NewellResearch paperMay 15 2016Bostonian ReliabilityWhen researching many sources written about the Boston massacre, there were severalauthors who issued articles about the Boston Massacre, particularly journals, letter andreferences. Some authors categorized the Boston massacre by its context in history by examiningit by the people who were involved in the important event. However, while the authors talk aboutjournals, letters and references, there really wasn’t much discussion about other important part ofthe Boston Massacre: who really caused it. The goal in this research paper is this BostonMassacre debate is by explaining how it was the colonist fault for causing the Boston massacrebecause they resulted in the…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Colonial Grievances During the mid 1760’s through the mid 1770’s, the colonists of the British Empire began to form a list of grievances against the king and government. The grievances that the colonies had and the events that took place over this decade led to the American Revolution against Britain. These grievances included those accusing the king of being ineffective and wrongful, those describing the mistreatment of the colonists, and those explaining the anger and wants of the colonists.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many things bad and good has happened that led up to the American Revolution. Although Things done by the English were most likely done with good intentions, they were not good. The American Revolution was justified. There are many reasons to why the American Revolution was justified. One reason is that the Acts that England put in place were unreasonable.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The ‘Boston massacre’ was more of a tragedy or self defence by the British soldiers in a way that the colonist brought murder to their own people. Although we know this event for a bloodbath caused by british soldiers, there is enough evidence to prove it was not their wrong. If the colonist were not throwing snowballs or insulting the soldiers we would not have this date as a major event in history. As the crowd grew bigger it caused the British soldiers to panic. The red coats were innocent, and would have been at fault in any way they would have handled the situation; either by the court or their captain.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays