Abstract
Many young voters today are not really involved too much in political sources. Young citizens tend to find democracy a boring part of a young citizens’ life. Voting is a big dimension for the government. Many young citizens tend to lack on the motivation to participate in elections. Young citizens are not engaging in the democracy in high schools and colleges. Not allowing young citizens to vote at the age of 16 would ensure that young voters get off to the best possible start. It will strengthen the choices of the young and signal citizens’ options. Young citizens politically campaign on single issues rather than for a political party. The brain is still developing until the mid-20’s, even though some states allow a 17-year-old …show more content…
Lowering the voting age would have negative consequences for the quality of democracy. While the turnout levels of young people under 18 are relatively low, young citizen’s failure to vote cannot be explained by a lower ability or motivation to participate. The quality of these citizen’s choices is like that of older voters, so young citizens do cast votes in ways that enable their interest to be represented equally well. These results are encouraging for supporters of a lower voting age. Citizens under 18 may lack the motivation and ability to participation in elections. The quality of vote choice is no lower than among older votes. Supporters argue that lowering the voting age would have a positive impact on electoral participation. Most individuals under 18 are likely to are likely to still be in school and live with their families. Young citizens tend to be not so engaged on the governmental politics today. All the elective policies are not easy to explain in the system. The government is afraid that young U.S. citizens does not know …show more content…
The young minds are not developed enough yet and the political education is still in the process of being taught to young citizens. The political education is limited to none, when it comes to what the government thinks. Young citizens’ base knowledge off of social media and what comes to the hearing of the ear. Elders does not rely on young citizens to have the knowledge in the political area to gain power for the government. Young citizens tend to see voting as a choice not a priority for the government. Young citizens politically campaign on single issues rather than for a particular party. There is no difference from voting at the age of 16 then the age of 18, to strengthen the political system the voting age should start at age 18. Young citizen’s minds in this generation, is not set on the political system today, tending not to care very much of it. Young citizens think of it as, something for the citizens 18 years of age or
Many young voters today are not really involved too much in political sources. Young citizens tend to find democracy a boring part of a young citizens’ life. Voting is a big dimension for the government. Many young citizens tend to lack on the motivation to participate in elections. Young citizens are not engaging in the democracy in high schools and colleges. Not allowing young citizens to vote at the age of 16 would ensure that young voters get off to the best possible start. It will strengthen the choices of the young and signal citizens’ options. Young citizens politically campaign on single issues rather than for a political party. The brain is still developing until the mid-20’s, even though some states allow a 17-year-old …show more content…
Lowering the voting age would have negative consequences for the quality of democracy. While the turnout levels of young people under 18 are relatively low, young citizen’s failure to vote cannot be explained by a lower ability or motivation to participate. The quality of these citizen’s choices is like that of older voters, so young citizens do cast votes in ways that enable their interest to be represented equally well. These results are encouraging for supporters of a lower voting age. Citizens under 18 may lack the motivation and ability to participation in elections. The quality of vote choice is no lower than among older votes. Supporters argue that lowering the voting age would have a positive impact on electoral participation. Most individuals under 18 are likely to are likely to still be in school and live with their families. Young citizens tend to be not so engaged on the governmental politics today. All the elective policies are not easy to explain in the system. The government is afraid that young U.S. citizens does not know …show more content…
The young minds are not developed enough yet and the political education is still in the process of being taught to young citizens. The political education is limited to none, when it comes to what the government thinks. Young citizens’ base knowledge off of social media and what comes to the hearing of the ear. Elders does not rely on young citizens to have the knowledge in the political area to gain power for the government. Young citizens tend to see voting as a choice not a priority for the government. Young citizens politically campaign on single issues rather than for a particular party. There is no difference from voting at the age of 16 then the age of 18, to strengthen the political system the voting age should start at age 18. Young citizen’s minds in this generation, is not set on the political system today, tending not to care very much of it. Young citizens think of it as, something for the citizens 18 years of age or