Love In Plato's Phaedrus

Improved Essays
In the beginning of “Phaedrus,” Socrates is convinced, by Phaedrus, to visit the country for a discussion. Socrates is immediately uncomfortable and out of place once he steps outside the city walls. Socrates is a man of the polis, or in other words “the city”. He is not a man who typically ventures beyond the city gates, but would rather stay inside to enjoy “stimulating” conversation. He did not seem to appreciate the beauty and meaning that can be found in nature. However, somewhere along the way Socrates seems to change his mind, and this is where it all begins.
Socrates tells Phaedrus in the passage above that “the men who dwell in the city are my teachers, and not the trees, or the country.” You can almost hear the disgust in his voice
…show more content…
Socrates has two main speeches in “Phaedrus” the first regarding love and its negative effects as a means of refuting Lysias’s claims about love. Socrates discusses love as a form of madness and how it forces people to lose morality and control. He seems to be drawing on his own opinions that he has formed from the polis. He is convinced that love is a terrible thing and that it causes more harm than good. However, in his second speech, known as “The Great Speech”, he discusses love as eros and that there are four types of divine madness. The four types are each connected to different gods Apollo, Diyonsous, the Muses, and Aphrodite. The fourth type is eros and he relates it to the soul by saying the soul is like a chariot with two horses and a driver. He says the greatest good would be to fly with the gods and if the soul is strong it will catch the ideas of beauty and self-knowledge. His descriptions of the heavens and the gods are clearly influenced by nature and this is where his contradicting statements come full …show more content…
He incorporated nature into his second speech to help prove his point. He also mentions the gods which are very influenced by nature in their qualities. He even says “…happy as in a mystery; shining in pure light, pure ourselves and yet enshrined in that living tomb which we carry about, now that we are imprisoned in the body, as in an oyster shell…” (Phaedrus 113). He is specifically making a comparison to nature, even though he supposedly thinks it is not inspiring. Socrates is influenced by nature regardless of how out of place he feels in the country. This idea of the city and the country appears in the beginning and is carried throughout the dialogue. The two men’s opinions are greatly influenced by their surroundings and help them to be better philosophers. They tie love and madness together with nature and natural human

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Caroline Machado Ethical Dimensions 31/8/2015 Ancient Greece: Socrates and Plato Socrates was a Greek philosopher born in Athens in the year 469 B.C who did not know how to read or write himself. So, all we know about him comes from Plato. Socrates was known as the wisest men in Athens, but he wanted to find someone as smart as him. He wanted to define the meaning of good, beauty and virtue.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He knows the craft of navigation but is dismissed as a useless stargazer. The good philosopher, like the one in the analogy, is disregarded because he seeks truth and not power or fame. The city will continue to be run by power hungry knack politicians until a true philosopher comes into power. The only problem with this notion is that a true philosopher can only be produced in an ideal city and an ideal city can only be run by a true philosopher. Plato’s republic is a self-sustaining system and Socrates shows that it is incredibly difficult to escape false…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One of Socrates progressive ideas was that he was not materialistic and did not lust after money or power. Socrates boldly claims “in my investigation of the service of the god I found that those who had the highest reputation were nearly the most deficient, were nearly the most deficient, while those who thought to be inferior were more knowledgeable” (25). This brazen quote rejects the common notion that those of wealth and prestige who hold the power of Athens are the ones who are superior in knowledge. Socrates, in his search for truth, compares the politicians to craftsmen in this quote. For when he investigated the claim that he is the wisest, Socrates compared the lowly craftsman to the powerful politician and found that the craftsman were wiser than those who held power.…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Voice of the Law Socrates is a man who questions what is morally correct and always expands our views and perspective on what it truly means to live. As he talks to Crito in his cell towards the date of his execution, Socrates discusses the importance of being a citizen of Athens. Although Crito tries to convince Socrates to escape, Socrates analyzes his reasons for staying or escaping. Crito is an important scene because it shows Socrate 's rational and thinking process as he is given the two choices, to escape and leave or to face death.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The first point Socrates makes when creating the city is that…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon is unsatisfied with the argument between Thrasymachus and Socrates regarding Justice. Thrasymachus believes Justice is for the common good, it is not for the good for an individual, that any compromise is involved. Glaucon renews Thrasymachus’ argument, he divides the good into three classes: things good in themselves, things good both in themselves and for their consequences, and things good only for their consequences. Socrates places justice in the class of things good in themselves and for their consequences without any hesitation. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove by exploring that Justice is best, not a compromise.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Symposium by Plato is a story which discusses the different types of love and how each type of man present in the story views love. Men give speeches, discussing the different types of love, the love of men being of the heavens, and love of women being of the earth. However, when analyzing the pieces, it becomes clear that there is more meaning to the writing than simply the existence of an earthly and a heavenly love. Rather, Plato wishes to convey a deeper, societal message in his writing. The views that Plato expresses through Socrates in the Symposium is surprisingly feminist.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Love is a rather big part of human nature, everyone needs love and give other people love as well. Love plays a role in present day life sometimes distracting people of their needs and duties just as it did in the past which is illustrated in Virgil’s The Aeneid “Book IV: The Passion of the Queen” by Virgil is about Dido, Queen of Carthage, and Aeneas, a Trojan warrior, who begin to fall in love with each other. As this is happening, the god Mercury comes down to Aeneas and reminds him that he needs to focus on his main duties instead of Dido and leave for Italy. Virgil uses Aeneas’ decision to complete his duties and task given to him instead of staying with Queen Dido to show that love is an outside force that is acting upon humans.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why the Trial of Socrates is Preposterous, Contradictory, and Ungrounded Fellow citizens, I greet you once more as Simon of Athens, a simple shoemaker. Before I explain to you how the principles of this trial contradict themselves, I would like to clear some misconceptions about me and my group of Socratic followers. Firstly, I do not oppose this trial, in fact, I welcome it. It will provide me an opportunity to show how preposterous it is to let an unlettered mob of politically swayed people to pass judgement on the wisest citizen in all of Athens. In this speech, I hope to impart some wisdom onto you as my perspective on the matter will no doubt strike a chord with yours.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thesis statement Through the speeches by men, love is examined by men attending a symposium or a drinking party. The symposium has its main concerns with the beginning, the purpose and nature of affection and care. Therefore, love is the central theme in Plato’s dialogues in Symposium. Introduction The Symposium is a philosophical text written by Plato in approximately 386-370BC.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Symposium by Plato there is discussion on what love is and for the assembled guests it has different meanings. Many types of love can be seen in Virgil’s Aeneid as well; there is love between people or of the devotion to gods and family (pietas). These types of loves can be described through Diotima’s speech. Diotima defines love as the desire to give birth to beautiful ideas that last forever; she argues that love is not fully knowledgeable or ignorant, and that the soul is more beautiful than the body. These ideals can be seen through the love Juno has for Carthage, the love Aeneas has for pietas, and the love Anchises has for Aeneas.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates and Callicles engage in a debate about what it means to be happy and to live a flourishing life. According to Callicles, a person is happy and flourishing when he or she is living as ambitiously as he or she possibly can. Living the good life includes chasing one satisfaction after another and having a constant influx of pleasure. In contrast, Socrates emphasizes on the idea of eudaimonia, according to which a happy and flourishing person is one that lives an orderly life, in which the person maintains discipline and control over oneself.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In The Republic of Plato, Plato considers the nature and value of justice and the other virtues as they appear in both the structure of society as a whole and in the personality of an individual human being. This city-soul analogy supplies Plato with a metaphoric language that enables him to describe aspects of the structure and dynamics of the human soul. He began with a detailed analysis of the formation, structure, and organization of an ideal state before applying its results to a description of personal life. This paper will explore how the Republic uses the description of an ideal city-state as a vehicle for explaining the harmonious operation of the human psyche, which can be likened to a city. This “psychopolis” can be well or poorly…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s The Republic, he posits that the perfect city will be virtually homogenous, and that there can be no division in the citizens of the city if it is to succeed. Aristotle, on the other hand, claims in his Politics that the perfect city will be as distant from that of Plato’s as possible, and instead will have a variety of different people within it. As Aristotle’s argument evolves, however, he determines that the citizens of a city should still be similar in a variety of ways and that the city must have some unity in order to thrive. Plato’s view of unity within his republic in speech is relatively simple. He argues that if there is any division within a city, it will not be ideal.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, in order for Glaucon’s and our understanding of this idea to further to the connection between “the effect of education and of the lack of it” (514a), Socrates offers his audience an allegory throughout Book VII of The Republic that has become immensely popular throughout centuries. Unlike before where Socrates would simply discuss his reasoning, The Allegory of the Cave offers a clear visual representation that critically reflects on society’s social and political themes while also making the journey up the “Divided Line” more understandable. Each element discussed in this allegory is symbolic, making it imperative that the audience pays close attention in order to fully comprehend the significance of the depicted scene. He begins by asking the listeners to “imagine human beings living in an underground, cavelike dwelling, with an entrance a long way up,…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays