Louis XIV And Absolutism

Improved Essays
Absolutism states that monarchs have the divine right to rule people and received their authority from God. The monarchs have all of the power and everyone else must obey the monarchs. To do that, the monarchs must take away the power of the powerful nobles. Louis XIV did this by moving the powerful nobles to his court at Versailles where they were occupied with numerous activities. He then appointed people from the middle class to government positions, where he could dominate them and keep them from being a problem. It also allowed him to create the “nobles of the robe” that would be used to undermine the prestige of the “nobles of the sword.” As a result, Louis can make laws, declare wars, and raise taxes. He also used the letters de cachet

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Political decisions should be decide from the top down due to complete control over everything. King Louis XIV is a great example of why political decisions should be run from top down. These reason include war, economics, and preservation of power. King Louis XIV was a master of warfare, money was not a problem so he bought a professional army that was one of the best army in the world. Loius desired power so he soon began expanding his borders.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He didn’t even want to become King. He wanted to help his subjects, but he wasn’t all too interested in getting rid of the debt in France, which resulted in him doing whatever it took to avoid his kingly duties which would involve hunting and making locks. He, instead, took advice from financial advisors that the people of France didn’t agree with whatsoever. He had also borrowed money from the court until 1786, when the borrowing limit was reached. When Louis made a decision himself, it would often lead to public turmoil.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Absolute monarchs and democracies are both types of government, however there are some major differences that set the two apart. In absolute monarchies the people have little to no power to influence governmental decisions. In Document 1: This illustration depicts the government of France from the mid-1600s to the early 1700s, the absolute ruler appears to be King Louis XIV. He is looking down upon his subjects, the nobles, as they kneel before him. When Louis ruled over France, he chose the sun as his emblem, signifying that everything revolved around him.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Louis XIV: The Sun King

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Alex Day Mr. Haller Global 10 January 5, 2016 I am the State Louis XIV, also known as the Sun King, is one of the most famous French kings because of the long lasting effects of his policies. Born on September 5, 1638, he reigned for 72 years and achieved his goal of creating an absolute monarchy. In order to do so, Louis reorganized France’s political system, enforced the worship of one religion, and created a central seat for power, which became Versailles. He was known as the “Sun King” because of the splendor of his court at Versailles. Today, he is most remembered for Versailles (which is visited by millions of tourists every year).…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result of the Louis XIV’s totalitarian reign, France became a superpower and a cultural icon. The reign of Louis XIV brought a sort self-service and ambition, encouraging those within the court to climb the political ladder. Consequentially, many nobles would vie for the sovereign’s attention,…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Henry IV took the thrown France was in troubled times. The religious troubles that had plagued Europe since the Reformation had left no nation untouched. Out of the troubles of religion emerged an absolutist period in France. It started with Henry who allowed Cardinal Richelieu dictate his policy and continued to centralize France’s power. Henry’s policies like the Fronde the Law of Concord allowed Louis XIV to obtain the throne and impose his will on his French subjects.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They both desired to limit their nobilities powers. Louis hated his nobility and tried to keep them out of his government. He required them to live at Versailles for part of the year so he could keep them distracted while he took on his affairs. He was able to collect taxes without the consent of the French Estates general, which was unheard of by any other ruler. Louis’s political structure was centralized absolutism, so he could handpick his desired ministers and limit the power of the nobility.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Russia, Peter the Great ruled from 1689-1725. He embodied absolutism because he both strengthened the central government and reduced the power of the nobility. He reorganized the government and created a Senate to administer the state. He divided Russia into different provinces to make administration more effective. He forced all landholders to serve in the military or another civil service position.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the Intellectual Revolution monarchies ruled with limited power. Power was shared between the King, the Catholic Church, and nobles. In the 17 century, the French monarchy implemented the idea of Royal absolutism which gave them uncheckable power. Louis XIV proposed the idea of the Divine right of kings. Kings had the right to rule through the authority of God.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many monarchs during the seventeenth century used absolutism as a governing force to rule their lands. During the reign of Louis XIV, Jean Domat wrote a profound document in which he addressed all areas of government and outlined what he believed to be the tenets of an absolute monarchy. This document, entitled “On Social Order and Absolute Monarchy” defined what he believed to be the basis of absolutism and class structure in regards to the law of God and the law of nature. Absolutism is as form of government where unrestricted, complete power is retained by a centralized sovereign individual. Domat displays immense support of the concept of absolutism and outlines the idea that the people should show loyalty to their one appointed leader who is chosen by God.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many rulers had a democracy government but it was difficult usually since the people found ways to overthrow the rulers. With absolutism many decisions involving the government were made quickly. King James I and King Louis XIV are just two examples of absolute monarchs that were able rule an entire empire effectively. Empires with absolute monarchs were very efficient. Various things were able to get done much faster.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism is a political solution where the monarchy controls every facets of government with no checks or balances, it was initially introduced by the English by Kings, James and Charles I. Although it was introduced in the England (maybe Spain) it never did take hold mainly because of an established parliament that was so strongly ingrained into the English process of government. On the other hand, Louis XIV was able to secure an absolute monarchy and take it to extremes. He was able under the precept of “Divine Right” and claiming to be servant of God. This would allow Louis XIV to dissolve the Estates-General (a general assembly). Louis XIV is the poster child of what an absolute monarch is supposed to be and had no issue in letting the people of France know his status.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism was a political theory created by the following individuals; Jean Bodin, Thomas Hobbes (somewhat), and Bishop Bossuet. The era of absolutism was a time, 16th to 18th centuries, when monarchs ruled with all power to themselves in most countries, especially in France. Absolutism was favored among monarchs because it gave them complete power over their country and did not have to answer to anyone but themselves. Western absolutist France and eastern countries were similar by focusing on military aspects such as spending money to build large and powerful armies to win wars and gain land, and using increased taxation on lower classes to gain money, as well as monarchs ruling as the sovereign of that state. Eastern and western absolutism…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism Vs Monarchy

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Absolutism is known for being under a single leader. Many have stated that “monarchical government is the best.” In The Theory of Divine Right absolute monarch was the “most natural” which lead to it being the “most durable” and “strongest.” With the government under a single ruler it could also lead to it being the “most opposed to divisiveness”, “worst evil of states”, and the “most certain cause of their ruin.” In many societies absolutism “works in harmony” with everything.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism was a big part of Europe for a long period of time and so was enlightenment but that does not mean that they got along. Some philosophers like Hobbes were for absolutism and thought that is the best government for the people, but others thought the opposite and were against it. Locke, Voltaire, and Wollstonecraft were some of the philosophers that rejected the concept of absolutism and went against the absolute monarchs and their policies. Thomas Hobbes believed in absolutism, he thought that people are naturally cruel, greedy and selfish, but John Locke was against absolutism, he believe in equality, freedom and natural rights for all men (Esler 545). Both men were 17th century english thinkers that gave ideas that became key to enlightenment but they had very different ideas on human nature and the government (Esler 545) this shows that it is not obvious…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays