Just because something is not wanted does not mean it isn't essential. Lord of The Flies is a novel by William Golding, exploring the human condition in a tale of the survival of children on an island. In the story there is a made up monster that symbolises the evil inside of us all. Mankind has always needed a devil to show us our heroes, give us a place to direct our blame, and to control the masses of humanity. Humans need a devil to show us our “saints” persay. In Lord of The Flies we were given the embodiment of a made up devil conceived from the fear of the island’s civilization. The beast is a constant reminder that evil is out there. It takes this fear to remind the kids that there is also goodness and something …show more content…
Lord of The Flies exemplifies the idea of a monster, or metaphorical devil, being used as a scapegoat for the deeply rooted fears of loneliness from the children. The following quote shows that they recognise this, “I know there isn’t no beast- not with claws and all that, I mean- but I know there isn’t no fear, either” (Golding 99). It is a lot easier for all parties for them to embody evil into a single entity that is capable of destruction. It is far more painful to acknowledge the indisputable fact that evil is everywhere and there is no way to halt it. This phenomenon of blame shifting is also shown in the current political race. A quote from the current republican frontrunner shows this in, “The enemy right now is within the muslim community” (Donald Trump). It is far more painless for a candidate to cast blame on an outside individual, rather than looking introspectively on themselves and the real issues facing the nation. Going along with the scapegoating devil figures theme, devils are held over the masses heads in order to manipulate the public. This is extremely prevalent in Lord of The Flies, as jack uses the entire idea of a beast to manipulate the other children into succumbing to his wishes. "‘Jack's in charge of the choir. They can be—what do you want them