Morality In William Golding's Lord Of The Flies

Improved Essays
Morality is the distinction between what is right and wrong. Some people believe that morality can be enforced with stringent laws, while other people do not. There are different stories to both sides of this argument. Morality is different from person to person. Everyone has a different set of morals that are unique and different from others.
Morality can’t be enforced by law. It should be up to the individual what is right and wrong. People will do what they want to do, no matter if their government enforces laws against their desired actions. Everyone has different views on what is right and wrong. They do not want someone telling them what to think or what to do.
General guidelines should be put into place of what people can’t do to ensure
…show more content…
There are rules and guidelines put into place for a reason. What you do and how you act when no one is around is who you really are. When those boys were on the island, their true colors showed. Piggy was trying to act civil and morally but other boys, such as Jack, did not act civil or rationally. Jack was hungry for power and was willing to do anything and everything in his power to make it to the top. “The ultimate end of the state lies in promoting the welfare of the people” (Pooja). The purpose of laws should be to help people and make them feel safe. Laws should promote the well-being of people. They should not impede someone from doing what they want, within reasoning. The difference between law and morality is that you can be punished for breaking a law by the State or by the government. If you break one of you morals, you can’t be punished by the government as long as there is not a law pertaining to that moral. Another important difference is that “Morality is concerned with both internal and external affairs of man whereas law is concerned only with the external affairs of man” (Pooja). In conclusion, there is a fine line between morality and law. There are certain aspects of life where law should not be able to control your morals and beliefs. There are, however, some instances where laws should be enforced to protect yourself from other

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Hammurabi Laws

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lopez 1 Hammurabi and United States Law Laws are used in all societies throughout the world. They keep civilizations in control to keep everyone on a common ground; some prevent us from committing injustice acts while others prevent hurting one another. People have different rights in their society. Muslim women aren't allowed to show too much skin, while laws in other countries focus more on the well being like buying or selling drugs.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone wants to do the right things in one way or another. Would you put yourself out in a situation to do it? By putting yourself out in the world it may cause a difference or start a reaction. Even when you believe it won’t have any change where you’re at, but it is something you must fulfill. You are supposed to risk everything to stand up for what you believe in, because that’s what your morals say is right.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Laws promote conformity and strip humans of individuality. Humans are born with emotion and free will. Mankind is supposed to be able to make choices, to use their intuition to solve problems. Laws suppress these characteristics. By telling us what to do and how to act, laws effectively turn people into beings no more autonomous than programmed machines.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anthony dones stated that “One of the main functions of our laws is to organize society in order to maximize productivity and increase efficiency”. What Anthony means by his quote is that one of the purposes to laws was to basically decreases the bad things and to increase the good things. There are other ways that laws do to benefit us though. Laws really come into action when you need control over a place.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Laws and Regulations could be used in the world to be helpful in some aspects of life but can also be used for bad things in other aspects. In the texts 1984, Radioactive, and Space Oddity many things could be learned about how laws and regulations could be used in the world today. In each of these stories, there are different laws and regulations that will control the characters the way that the specific government in the story wants them to be like. In some of these texts, the government wants their people to be free and be able to do anything but in some other governments, the governments want their people to live in one specific way that the government creates for them and it's not necessarily the best way to live.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I think that Boycotts are the most effective. Boycotts can break the image of something and call attention to people everywhere. Usually when theres a boycott on something, theres always another way around it. For example the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Although they relied on the public transportation to get them to places, they carpooled with other people, and even walked.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trying to decide whether I am an objectivist or a relativist was a tough decision. Do I think people follow the same set or ethical codes and morals? Or do I believe that people’s morals and ethical codes depend on the individual person. After thinking about the both of those, I have decided that I am a combination of both an objectivist and a relativist, but I lean a little more towards the relativist side. A relativist is someone who has their own morals and ethics based on how they feel.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When it comes to the topic of laws, most of us will readily agree that breaking the laws is unjust. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of if there is ever a time when a law can acceptably be broken. Whereas some are convinced that laws should never be broken, others maintain that there are some instances where laws should be broken. Socrates and Antigone would agree with the statement that disobeying laws is never the answer. Likewise, I have always believed that breaking the laws should be punishable and should never be done.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If one were to examine the history of human civilization, they would be certain to find one continuity: the existence of law. From the ancient state of Babylon to the United States of America, citizens find themselves bound by certain rules and regulations. The laws set forth by our government tell us what to do, what not to do, and give us incentives to act in a “proper manner. ”Ideally law fosters order in society. However,because of the imperfect nature of our world, law and order do not always go hand in hand.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason that there are laws are to keep everyone from doing the wrong thing and…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Laws should stay strong and act the same toward all people. And everyone should obey the laws, no matter…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As political philosopher Montesquieu puts it “the spirit of the law is justice. The letter must be broken at some points to achieve it.” Justice is defined in the dictionary as being consistent with what is morally right. Unfortunately, what is considered as legal is not always consistent with what is morally right. For sure, a huge amount of laws are made to ensure that people have their fundamental human rights, safety, equality and freedom.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The morality comes from the unified decisions of the community, what they deem expectable. It is then created into law by language and put into practice through judicial history and inspiration, this allows for the voice to be come cohesive. These decisions give room for evolution so as to always reflect the intended meaning for the current society. Therefore, integrity of law is the state being whole in original intent, and undivided by pure discretion that devotees form precedents. Though that allows for a flaw to occur, judges making various answers by their own interpretations, these answers are basic happenings of law and should always strive for the original intent of the society; reflecting their…

    • 1984 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Old El Paso Taco Shells

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Yet, unless we agree on what is morally right and make laws that reflect those morals, we will always have this issue between the legal code and our conscience. Take segregation laws in the United States, for example. It may have been against the law for Rosa Parks to sit in the front of the bus, but to many, segregation was immoral and thus, Parks was justified for breaking the law. Once the law was changed, then the new law, in theory was moral. While I think the laws banning segregation are moral, clearly not every American believed that.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First of all, there are no settled rules between laws and ethics. Ethics change over time, so does the law to reflect the changes in moral principles. The society all in all utilizes laws to indicate what individuals can and cannot do. Additionally, laws indicate what will be the penalty if those rules are not followed (Jones & George, 2016, pp.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays