Argument Builder
Name: Olukemi Adelakun Class: 302 Period: 3
Overall Position
The view I am arguing for is: Humans are basically violent and savage
My argumentative claims are the reasons my overall position is true. They are
Claim 1: The boys on the island disregarded the rules
Claim 2: The boys turned into animals
Claim 3: The hunters, hunted very savagely
Evidence to back up my claims:
Evidence 1: Jack went against Ralph( the chief of the tribe) and broke off and decided he wasn't going to follow the rules and created his own tribe
Reasoning: This just goes to show that Jack followed the rules at one point, but then decided he was tired of them. He then goes on to even create his own outside tribe and plot against Ralph and …show more content…
Which initially lead Jack and the others to paint their faces to hide better from pigs while hunting.
Reasoning: Jack and tribe paint their faces to hide better from the pigs while planning to kill them in a violent process. Their painted faces symbolize a mask in which Jack uses to hide from a functioning symbolized society.
Evidence 3: While hunting the pigs or anything really, the hunters had a chant. Which goes by "Kill the beast! Cut its throat! Spill its blood! Do him in!"
Reasoning: While hunting the hunters had a saying "Kill the Beast! Cut its throat! Spill its blood! Do him in!". A violent saying when they had been done killing something. For example with Simon, who was an existing member of the group has been violently killed by the hunters. While stabbing him with their sharp spheres they sang this chant. So even up to the point where they put a pig's head on a stick as a gift to the existing "beast".
Refutation Builder
My Argumentative claims are the reason my position is true they are:
Claim 1: Most of the boys on the Island disregarded the rules
Claim 2: The hunter turned into
Name: Olukemi Adelakun Class: 302 Period: 3
Overall Position
The view I am arguing for is: Humans are basically violent and savage
My argumentative claims are the reasons my overall position is true. They are
Claim 1: The boys on the island disregarded the rules
Claim 2: The boys turned into animals
Claim 3: The hunters, hunted very savagely
Evidence to back up my claims:
Evidence 1: Jack went against Ralph( the chief of the tribe) and broke off and decided he wasn't going to follow the rules and created his own tribe
Reasoning: This just goes to show that Jack followed the rules at one point, but then decided he was tired of them. He then goes on to even create his own outside tribe and plot against Ralph and …show more content…
Which initially lead Jack and the others to paint their faces to hide better from pigs while hunting.
Reasoning: Jack and tribe paint their faces to hide better from the pigs while planning to kill them in a violent process. Their painted faces symbolize a mask in which Jack uses to hide from a functioning symbolized society.
Evidence 3: While hunting the pigs or anything really, the hunters had a chant. Which goes by "Kill the beast! Cut its throat! Spill its blood! Do him in!"
Reasoning: While hunting the hunters had a saying "Kill the Beast! Cut its throat! Spill its blood! Do him in!". A violent saying when they had been done killing something. For example with Simon, who was an existing member of the group has been violently killed by the hunters. While stabbing him with their sharp spheres they sang this chant. So even up to the point where they put a pig's head on a stick as a gift to the existing "beast".
Refutation Builder
My Argumentative claims are the reason my position is true they are:
Claim 1: Most of the boys on the Island disregarded the rules
Claim 2: The hunter turned into