McPherson has expertly woven a story of the “Lost Cause” viewpoint. Although I may disagree with this viewpoint and find some its claims ludicrous, I can respect that McPherson started off by utilizing opinions from primary sources, not his personal beliefs, to explain the school of thought. For example, when discussing the South’s impact on children and perceived intellectual threats, McPherson wrote, “Here was the serpent in the garden, warned Confederate veterans: Yankee textbooks introducing innocent Southern children to the knowledge of good and evil – mostly Northern good and Southern evil.” This “warning” was reported by him as expressed by Southerners in the past – this is not, necessarily, an expression of his
McPherson has expertly woven a story of the “Lost Cause” viewpoint. Although I may disagree with this viewpoint and find some its claims ludicrous, I can respect that McPherson started off by utilizing opinions from primary sources, not his personal beliefs, to explain the school of thought. For example, when discussing the South’s impact on children and perceived intellectual threats, McPherson wrote, “Here was the serpent in the garden, warned Confederate veterans: Yankee textbooks introducing innocent Southern children to the knowledge of good and evil – mostly Northern good and Southern evil.” This “warning” was reported by him as expressed by Southerners in the past – this is not, necessarily, an expression of his