Frankl would identify as being the will to pleasure and the will to power. However, this may be linked to what he identifies as an ''existential vacuum''. As he describes in his book: the existential vacuum is a widespread phenomenon of the twentieth century. A statistical survey recently revealed that among Frankl's students, 25% showed a more-or-less marked degree of existential vacuum. Among his American students it was not 25 but 60%. The existential vacuum manifests itself mainly in a state of boredom. Now we can understand Schopenhauer when he said that mankind was apparently doomed to vacillate eternally between the two extremes of distress and boredom. In actual fact, boredom is now causing, and certainly bringing to
Frankl would identify as being the will to pleasure and the will to power. However, this may be linked to what he identifies as an ''existential vacuum''. As he describes in his book: the existential vacuum is a widespread phenomenon of the twentieth century. A statistical survey recently revealed that among Frankl's students, 25% showed a more-or-less marked degree of existential vacuum. Among his American students it was not 25 but 60%. The existential vacuum manifests itself mainly in a state of boredom. Now we can understand Schopenhauer when he said that mankind was apparently doomed to vacillate eternally between the two extremes of distress and boredom. In actual fact, boredom is now causing, and certainly bringing to