Logical Fallacies In Bowling For Columbine

Great Essays
The director of the documentary Bowling for Columbine Michael Moore, portrays many of today’s issues in the United States of America. American’s have a hard time with thinking things through and trying to find the root to major problems, thus resulting into a total disaster. The United States has the most gun related crimes in the world. Michael Moore tries to find the root to this problem which is seemingly unknown. Citizens and the media tend to make generalizations that try to single out people or other things as if they are the problem to the gun related crimes, but most of these generalizations are logical fallacies that are irrelevant to the actual problem. Some of the main points that I received from the film Bowling for Columbine are …show more content…
This way of thinking ignores the existence of the 2nd Amendment in the United States Constitution. Abolishing guns altogether would not solve anything. This would only raise the sales on guns in the black market. Violence would increase drastically because if the government tried to take away one the rights given in the Constitution people would try to overthrow the government. In the documentary, Bowling for Columbine, Michael Moore interviewed some of the members in a militia in Michigan and the members were discussing that their duty was to protect the American people incase if the government became too powerful. The abolishment of all guns is an ignorant way of thinking, because the argument ignores the fact that there could be a safe community with the existence of guns. Michael Moore in Bowling for Columbine shows how Canada has a lot of guns and there is hardly ever any gun related crimes there. America could learn a lot from how the Canadians run their …show more content…
Moore shows both sides of the argument of gun control very well. Moore shows how Americans do not think things through. Many Americans make generalizations on the root of the gun control problem, but most of these generalizations are irrelevant. Michael Moore tried to find the root to the gun related crimes in the United States. There is not a concrete answer, but other countries around the world have figured it out, but Americans cannot seem to. Some of the main points that I received from the film Bowling for Columbine are that guns are not the root to the problem, a major part of the problem is what the media portrays in the United States, and the National Rifle Association (NRA) is a total joke. There are ways the United States could solve this increasing problem of violence. The United States government needs to make it essential on figuring out how to lower the amount of gun related crimes. The task of getting these crimes to occur in lower number is going to be very difficult, but needs to be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “In Bowling for Columbine, how effectively do the persuasive techniques used by Michael Moore convey his intended meaning of the film” The persuasive techniques used by Michael Moore ensure that the film Bowling for Columbine’s (BFC) meaning is clearly conveyed. Moore has chosen to use three persuasive techniques, these being ethos, pathos and logos to effectively share and enhance the film 's message. BFC aims to inform the audience with a compelling argument as to why America’s gun control and violence needs to be readdressed.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The goal of Michael Moore’s documentary film, Bowling for Columbine, is to persuade his white, liberal, affluent audience to believe his theory that Americans (especially Americans living in the middle of the country) are trigger-happy, fearful people who rely on violence to solve problems. Moore attempts to establish the ethos of an “average gun-owning American” by describing how much he loved guns as a little boy and that he is a lifetime member of the NRA, but he undercuts his credibility by choosing to interview members of the Michigan militia, an extremist fringe group, rather than other “average” gun-owning Americans. He crassly appeals to the audience’s sense of “white guilt” through his use of the cartoon, “A Brief History of the United…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Using interviews has played a major part in structuring Moore’s Bowling for Columbine. Alongside this persuasive format, Moore creates a sense of independence for the viewer, directly speaking to them through the use of rhetorical questioning. Speaking to the viewer and the whole of America, Moore asks us “why are we afraid?” Before allowing us to make up our own answer, the answer is presented to us through news footage, demonstrating the influence that media networks have over the country. Explicitly using violence where the perpetrators are specifically ethnic groups and the youth, the media is successful in creating a terrified society such as referring to migrating bees as “Africanised bees”.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mass Shooting Summary

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The op-ed piece “Mass shootings are an American problem. There’s an American solution.” was written in response to the deadliest mass shooting in modern American history. On September 30, 2017, in Las Vegas, Nevada, a gunman opened fire on attendees at a country music concert, killing 58 and injuring well over 500. Published just four days later, at a time when emotions are heightened and people are searching for answers to the questions of how and why such a horrific event could occur, Chris Murphy appeals to that very emotion in this piece.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In American society, violence runs rampage throughout the country causing its citizens to be trepidacious and demoralize. One of the major components of violence in America emanates from guns. In the documentary, "Bowling for Columbine", Michael Moore, a famous filmmaker, addresses the ubiquitous situation in America. He argues that the use of gun in America co-insides or correlates to the recent massacres; as a whole, America should have stricter gun control laws. Throughout the film, Moore uses specific references to stricter gun control laws by employing ethos, pathos and logos to construct his argument in order to convince his audience.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The general argument made by author Paul Waldman in work “The Case For Banning Guns”, is that guns are pretty much the reason for all the murders, suicides, and mass shootings. And that if guns were banned our society would be better off. More specifically, Waldman argues that he believes guns should be banned. He states that he understands the many reasons gun owners have for not wanting the weapons to be banned. These reasons are valid such as uses for self defense, hunting, or the weapon is just important to the family and has been passed down through generations.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stricter Gun Control Laws

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A lot of people think that taking away guns will make it impossible for a criminal to get and gun and that it will also lower crime rates involving weapons. “The Proposition you can vicariously control criminal or psychopathic behaviour by confiscating private property and burying law-abiding citizens under a mountain of regulations is absurd” (Falco,…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Michael Moore used strategic ideas to get his point across. Bowling for Columbine made me wonder why it was called ‘Bowling for Columbine’ and what the main point of the documentary was. Bowling for Columbine is an American documentary about the 1999 Columbine High School Massacre. Michael Moore focuses on the scenery and environment on which the massacre took place, taking his filming to the public to gather opinions about related issues. The film also looks into how violent the United States…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stricter Gun Laws

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States is a first world country where people come to foster their dreams and live in peace and prosperity. However, the issue of gun violence is currently tarnishing the American image and raising questions about how ensure peoples' safety. This recent rise in mass shootings, particularly in schools, has people questioning the cause and the solutions to the gruesome issue. The U.S. is similar to many countries concerning mental health care and overall economic status but is an anomaly with shootings when in comparison. Many countries that have enacted stricter laws towards access of guns, have seen positive results.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, let’s start out with some facts about gun violence in the United States. The first facts that will be presented are from an article by the U.S. Department of Justice. This article explores the facts about gun violence and crimes involving guns from 1993-2011. The U.S. Department of Justice states that there were 478,400 fatal and nonfatal crimes committed with firearms. (Planty and Truman, 1) That number breaks down to an alarming number of about 60 crimes committed with firearms per hour.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control is an extremely controversial topic that has spawned a tremendous amount of debate over the past few years. Most of the debates occur when there are mass shootings at schools, churches, or other public places. Mallory Simons is a writer and senior producer of online presentations for CNN. She wrote Gun Debate: Where is the Middle Ground on January 31, 2013 and it appeared on CNN.com the same day. In her article she discussed recent acts of gun violence and the effect they have had on the gun control debate.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Violence Solution

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Violence in the United States has become one of the largest topics of debate as of recent. Murder has become much too common, and the rate of this crime is only increasing. The solution to violence, more specifically gun violence, is a large point of discussion in the current presidential race. Citizens and politicians alike have very different viewpoints on how this issue should be dealt with, and this disagreement is causing a hindrance to actually solving the problem at hand.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While I do not believe we should completely get rid of guns, I think there should be tight restrictions on who is able to own a gun. I believe only game hunters and our military should have the right to own guns and they should only be able to get them if they pass things such as a mental stability test. I know people want to be able to defend themselves…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns should be banned because they are too violent, without them the world would be more peaceful, and crime rates would decrease. This society gun is the best thing for us to have in this world to protect yourself from someone harm us, and our family as well. Have you wondering if the guns were banned we wouldn’t worry about people threaten us and stealing our stuff from our house because they don’t have power to harmed people, without weapon they become weaker also less violence and less crime also death as well and that is good for our society to stay safe and peaceful. Guns are too violent for the whole world especially for the teenager because teens are more emotionally effect than grown up people also Teenager get more influencing…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Should Be Banned

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages

    After obtaining guns, children and adults collect them and proceed to improve their accuracy in shooting, but getting rid of them would make the world a dangerous place. Many people who believe that guns are the leading cause of death in the United States, are incorrect. A gun is not a person, it has no feelings nor can it move on its own it cannot be personified nor be blamed for any of the actions. A gun must be wielded by a person and that person is the one responsible for pulling the trigger. If guns were banned and somehow a criminal couldn’t get his hand on one illegally, they can still kill.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays