Aristotle's Goals Of The Constitution

Improved Essays
The six goals in the pre-amble are establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote general welfare, secure the blessings of liberty, and form a more perfect union. Locke would agree with the goal to provide for the common defense, he thought that the government should protect the people’s rights, our government did this by creating armies and navies to look over the country. Locke would also be a connection to promoting general welfare, and commonwealth, he finds the health of citizens to be an important protection from the government. Montesquieu believed in the government protecting the liberty of the people, he also came up with the three branches of government that the founding fathers eventually …show more content…
Aristotle has seemed to play a large role in this influence. When writing the Constitution the Founding Fathers often looked at problems or things that philosophers pointed out, Aristotle in particular included slavery in his writing. In his book “Politics” he points out one relationship as master-slave, and he points out that some people are slaves by nature, while others are the masters. At the time slavery would have been a concern for the Founding Fathers, as it had always been around since the bible, and Aristotle mentions it in his book. Although slavery was not an issue in the country at the time of the Constitution, it would have been in the minds of the Founding Fathers from its history, and from the writings of Aristotle. Women’s rights and suffrage would not have been a concern then, and it did not become a huge concern in the country until the mid 1900s. The Founding Fathers would not have seen women’s suffrage as a problem at the time, so they overlooked it while writing the constitution and focused on issues they saw as threats, such as …show more content…
The first amendment allows for the freedom of religion, which includes being able to believe in what you want or to not believe at all, if that is what you choose. The government does not allow for prayers in public buildings in states because it may cause people to feel forced to participate, therefore taking away their right to freedom of religion. It is the government’s job to protect the people and their rights, so in order to avoid people feeling that their religious freedom is being taking away or that it is getting infringed upon they say that prayer and the ten commandments are not allowed in public places. The Federal government can still have “in God we trust” on our money, the ten commandments in the Supreme Court Chambers, and let congress open with an invocation because it is the federal government and is not the states making the decision. This keeps the rulings consistent within states, but still does not have the federal government openly favoring one religion over another. These things have been part of the federal government for a long time, and has now just become part of a tradition that the country wants to uphold. By allowing these things in the federal government but not within states it stays consistent with the first amendment, but still allows the tradition of the country from its beginnings to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Selective Incorporation is a constitutional legal code that protects the rights of a citizen that is ensured in the Bill of Rights. It has been used in numerous cases throughout time to remind everyone that every citizen’s rights are protected. Some cases include Town of Greece v. Galloway, McDonald v. Chicago, Benton v. Maryland, and Atkins v. Virginia. In these cases, multiple people were tried for what were misunderstood as wrongdoings. Selective Incorporation is used widely in the judicial branch by judges and the jury to determine a verdict.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court is WRONG!! Engel v. Vitale (pg. 757) Engel v. Vitale. Majority of people have never heard of this Supreme Court case. However the impact that this Supreme Court case had was tremendous.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The First Amendment and Texas vs. Johnson The First Amendment states that the government cannot force religion on the people, or not allow the people to practice certain religions. Also, the government cannot take away the right to freedom of speech, press, the right to gather peaceably, or petition the government for their problems or complaints. The first Amendment and Texas vs. Johnson both focus a lot on freedom of speech. In the First Amendment freedom of speech is just one of the listed freedoms, but people can interpret that in many different ways.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chirag N. Rao Political Science Essay#2, Topic= the Civil Rights and the Liberties Scenarios, Due= Thursday, February 19th, 2015 The hearing of an appeal to post Ten Commandments on the walls of a public or government building is an interesting case, whose relevance goes back to the famous phrase, namely, “Separation of Church and State”. Roots of this phrase can be traced all the way back to a letter written by Thomas Jefferson in January of 1802 to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut. Though the First Amendment clause against establishment of religion by law was to ensure that there was separation between religion and government, various courts to this day are still hearing cases and this remain an ongoing subject of interpretation and perspectives. I believe this is so because the various court decisions and legislation such as First Amendment, Lemon Test, Civil Rights and Liberties make it ambivalent between separation of religion and that of freedom to practice religion.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Current Event: Church of Satan and separation of church and state: Alex Newkirk The First Amendment of the U.S. constitution prohibits making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. (U.S. Constitution) This means that our government guarantees United States citizens religious freedom.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Unjust Advantages

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first amendment clearly states that the US government shall not hold higher, or provide an unjust advantage to any religion over another, while the Freedom of Worship clause much more crealy states that the residents of Texas have cannot have their freedom to practice their religion in whole taken from them. The first amendment was made to prevent the government from adopting a certain religion over others, while the freedom of worship amendment was made to protect religious practices and worship. 2. The Texas and US constitutions do not necessarily collide here. The US constitution makes it clear that the government shall not hold higher, nor provide an unjust advantage to any religion over another.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, Repeal the National Day of Prayer written on May 6th, 2009 by Conejo Valley Democrat States that the National Day of Prayer is unconstitutional. I agree with the author of this article because the President should repeal the National Day of Prayer. The National Day of Prayer is unconstitutional because it goes against the first Amendment in our Bill of Rights. In the First Amendment it is stated that you can believe any faith you'd like and you can practice or say whatever you feel. However, National Day of Prayer where the president has to make a public prayer and a proclamation that that uses and references the Bible and says, “under God” goes against that.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The framers of the Constitution were visionaries who sought to establish a limited representative government which not only restricted the powers of an existing government, but also safeguarded the rights of the minority through restricting majority rule. A republic, they believed, would be the only form of government in which the liberty of the people could be preserved. Greatly influenced by the 17th century British philosopher John Locke, who advocated for the protection of natural rights of man by entering into a social contract, separation of governmental powers, and individuals’ right to consent to being governed, the founding fathers were able to incorporate such teachings into the Constitution of the United States. The American founders…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-federalists pushed for the Bill of right to be included in the U.S. Constitution to attempt preventing an overbearing central government. The Constitution created by the Federalists was claimed to be written by aristocrats withholding rights to personal liberties of the people. Anti-Federalists feared that this might lead to an aristocratic tyranny where power would be held only by those with time, power, and wealth (Shelley, Schmidt, & Bardes, 2015). While Anti-Federalists were against such strong powers of the central government, they agreed that certain aspects of states’ governments should be equally upheld through federal legislation.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Amendments were introduced to the American Congress in 1789. They were created to protect the individuals of the United States. The Amendments are changes made to the Constitution by adding, altering, or omitting a certain part or term. The constitution has been amended twenty-seven times since 1788. The first ten amendments are called the Bills of Rights.…

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Never the less they were given a smaller wage than men. As well as being accepted in the work force they wanted the right to own property. Also women wanted the right to have equal educational purposes as men as this was key to allow them to have a greater measure of independence and autonomy. They wanted rights and to be acknowledge in this country just as the Declaration of…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It took over 70 years for women to finally be given a voice and the right to vote. The 19th amendment helped the women of America become who they are today. Without the Women’s Suffrage Movement, America would be a different place. The women’s suffrage movement all started in the year 1848 where the women were treated as a prized possession in front of a guess, but behind closed doors, they were mentally and physically abused.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America is a nation that prides itself on the concept of freedom, and the backbone of this freedom is the Bill of Rights. Written by former president and founding father James Madison, the Bill of Rights was created in order to ensure and protect each citizen’s individual liberty. While today we recognize twenty-seven amendments, the Bill of Rights is comprised of the original ten constitutional amendments. While some of these ten amendments are more relevant and controversial in today’s day and age than others, they all prove to be vital and unique in their own right.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Democracy is a deviant constitution where the virtuous few turn out worse than the many when they come together even though the virtuous have the upper hand in individuality. A wise individual could be overruled by the many who combine their virtue and wisdom (Miller 2012). Aristotle’s view on democracy was that it was a subjective form of a constitutional government. A constitutional government was one where the ‘many’ ruled; however democracy was the contorted view. “The Athenian system differed from a modern representative democracy in that the citizens were more directly involved in governing” (Miller 2012).…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years, there has been a major conversational issue in the United States today about whether prayer should or should not be allowed in public schools. Prayer has already been banned in various numbers of public schools across the country. Many people have different religious views on this issue, but someone else’s religious view should not determine what someone else can do. The First Amendment states “freedom of religion”, so why can children not have this right in public school? There are plenty of different religions.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays