Litmus Testing Research Paper

Decent Essays
I believe a litmus test should be used. Federal judges are in for 10 years unless reappointed for. During the time the Federal judges are in office things will change over the many years they are in. We shouldn’t hold onto beliefs or laws that are outdated. The decisions of these judges impact not only the parties involved in a particular case, but also the entire judicial system and even society at large. The federal judges shouldn’t use the own personal morals and beliefs that reflect their own opinion and outlook. That would be bias, and also this would give people a different view on the issue. We the people should not be blindsided by a federal judge’s ruling. We should have the right to know where they stand on issues. We the people should

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    American Politics 1 Presentation In Robert H. Bork’s Testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee (1987), he was delivering testimony before the United States Senate Judiciary Committee on his judicial philosophy. He points out what he believes is his understanding of the role of the judiciary in a constitutional democracy. Judge Bork believes that a judiciary’s authority derives from applying the law and not personal values, the intentions of the lawmakers to govern whether the lawmakers are the Congress enacting a statute or those who ratified our constitution, and the precedent of those in the judiciary who enacted a law in the past. Bork points out that he wrote in an opinion for our courts, the judge’s responsibility is “to discern how the framers’ values, defined in the context of the world they knew, apply in the world we know.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Supreme Court justice argue in valid points. The world is changing and so does technology and the views of citizens. While making decision justice(s) must think about when was constitution written and how the world have change since then, if not it would be like watching black and white television today. So I support the Justice Breyer approach and court must be guided by the views of the citizens. Just a caution note I’m not trying to say we must ignore the constitution and do what we like…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In most cases, the Supreme Court should have the final voice. Moreover, Supreme Court judges might not always come from privileged backgrounds, but they are almost always over-qualified for the position, and most have served as federal judges. Hudson points to a controversial case in the book, such as the one involving abortion and Texas. The was a case for the state of Texas’ Supreme Court, rather the Supreme Court of the United States. Hudson’s proposal would only overburden the Congress, which already has a lot on its plate.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Federalist Alexander Hamilton regarded the Constitution as the fundamental law, which is superior to any state statute, and as a limited Constitution. In Federalist Paper Number 78, Hamilton argues that the Supreme Court should have the authority to invalidate acts of Congress that are deemed unconstitutional, and that if there is a variance between the Constitution and a law passed by Congress, federal courts have the responsibility to follow the Constitution. Paper Number 78, having been cited in thirty-seven Supreme Court opinions as of April 2007, has had an immense influence on the debate regarding the interpretation and application of the Constitution (Coenen). Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is an advocate of textualism, arguing that the meaning of the Constitution lies in the words of the document, and that the Constitution should be regarded in favor of its “original meaning”. Justice Stephen…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Standardized Test Introduction Standardized testing is given in mostly all universities and establishments. These tests are intended to be controlled and documented in a dependable manner. Standardized testing are the same in all instutions. Everyone who takes the test is obligated to find a solution to the same set of questions.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another recommendation I would suggest is that judges from time to time would need to be reviewed to make sure there is no bias in decision making in his cases. They also must be reminded that they are government officials who must follow strict principles and rules in order to justly uphold the constitution, and the laws of the U.S., and when these officials do not, they must be punished to prevent further misconduct from…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Supreme Court justices do have personal views. They are appointed through a political process. Observers naturally must ask how great a role their political views actually play. Some scholars argue that the justices’ political preferences play a large role, essentially dictating their decisions in many cases. They point to the fact that justices appointed by conservative presidents tend to vote in a conservative fashion and those appointed by liberal presidents vote the opposite way.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Late nights studying? Stress over passing the test? No sleep? These are all reasons why SOL’s should be abolished. SOL tests are standards of learning for students in Virginia.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pewresearch.com took a survey on Republicans, Democrats, and Independents on whether the U.S. Supreme Court should base rulings as they are meant today or as they were originally written. Most Republicans said that the U.S. Supreme Court should base rulings as they were originally written (69% to 29%). On the other hand, Democrats (70% to 26%) and Independents (48% to 47%) said that the court rulings today should be based on what the U.S. Constitution means in current times. In total 49% of the people that were surveyed, said that the Supreme Court should base rulings on today’s meaning of it. 46% of people surveyed said that they should rule court cases by how the U.S. Constitution was originally written.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the court ruled that Phillips had to bake a cake for Charlie and David, he did have his First Amendment rights violated. In the future, the court should consider a different ruling, such as a fine and allow people to run their business in a way that doesn’t violate the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, rather than forcing him to provide the service. My decision would support the reasoning that people can have their own beliefs under the First Amendment, as long as they do not violate the rights of another. My decision would not force Jack Phillips to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples unless he is making them for heterosexual couples; he has the decision to make wedding cakes for everyone, or for no one. This ruling supports that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act are…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Standardized Testing is a Global Issue “If the purpose of learning was to score well on a test, we lost sight of the real reason of learning.” A quote by Jennie Fullbright. Standardized testing has been a part of the educational system since the beginning of the twentieth century and it was created by a psychologist named Alfred Binet. The test developed a love-hate relationship through all students in Universities. These tests were to improve efficiency and managing the student’s population growth in the early twentieth centuries.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you go out and about within our country and you ask people if they knew very much about the United States court system, they will most likely tell you that they do not know very much about the court system unless they have been involved with the court system whether it be federal or state level. Most people do not realize that the court systems have three levels within them or that there is certain situation that will allow you to get to one level or the other. There is a whole lot of information that some people may not know. They may not know about judicial review and how it came about. Some people may not even know how justices decide the ruling of their cases.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays