The Lottery And The Hobbyist Analysis

Superior Essays
Stories are made up of different literary elements such as the setting, plot, conflicts, and the overall theme of the story itself. Stories such as The Lottery and The Hobbyist showed such elements, which is why I picked those stories to show their differences. The Hobbyist by Fredric Brown is about a man named Mr. Sangstrom wanting to kill his wife, and asking a man called the druggist to help him by poisoning her. The situation quickly shifts for the worse as Mr. Sangstrom was tricked and poisoned by the druggist, and having to write a confession letter to the homicide detail in exchange for a possible antidote. In The Lottery by Shirley Jackson, villagers in an unnamed village participate in a traditional lottery draw, though the winners don’t actually win anything, but are instead stoned to death by the villagers. The winner in the story, Tessie, was one of very few (if not any) who thought the traditions were out of place and should be stopped. By reading both stories I have seen …show more content…
But before the end and theme of each story is revealed, the authors give us a sense of dramatic and situational irony through the stories. Finally, we see contrasts in both situational and dramatic irony in The Hobbyist and The Lottery. In The Hobbyist, we see how the authors builds up the story with situational irony. When Mr. Sangstrom comes up to the druggist for the poison, he talks about killing his wife.
Essentially this makes us believe that somehow the two will work together to kill his wife, but we are tricked when it is revealed that the druggist poisoned him instead. The author immediately set up the perfect scene for him to be poisoned, which was when they went for coffee. “I was about to take a coffee break, come with me and have a cup.” (Paragraph 2, Page

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Now Hamlet has the poisoned sword and Shakespeare brings out his new association to the poison and connects it to his corruption. This is evident as Hamlets need to revenge his father’s death presents its opportunity. Hamlet then “Hurts the King” and forces Claudius to “Drink off this potion” to avenge his father and kill Claudius. (5.2.353,357) This sudden turn of events shows the strong symbolism of poison to…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamlet learns from the ghost (his father) that his own uncle, Claudius killed him. – Which was by him pouring poison into King Hamlet’s ear. This encounter demonstrates how the need for power can corrupt someone. This need for power caused Claudius to poison and sadly kill his own brother. Another example is when Laertes and Claudius were planning to kill Hamlet.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once Laertes found out his father was dead he wanted to kill his father 's murder. Laertes even said himself in Act 4 Scene 5, “Let come what comes, only I’ll be revenged most thoroughly for my father.” (page 215). His loyalty and madness only makes his revenge more certain and he utilizes them as a stimulation to actually carry out revenge. Additionally, once he sees that Ophelia turned mad and eventually drowns herself because her father was killed by Hamlet and Hamlet has left her, Laertes is motivated to avenge Hamlet. In the complex story of Hamlet, Claudius also seeks revenge.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When consulting King Claudius, Laertes and the King conjured up a plan to have a duel in which Laertes poisoned his sword and Claudius placed poison in a cup to have Hamlet to drink. Unfortunately, the poisonous sword killed Hamlet and Gertrude drunk the cup with poison in it both leading to death. Throughout Act 5, Hamlet, King Claudius and Laertes were all seeking public justice for the death of others. However, as Hamlet procrastinated throughout the play, his time to avenge his father death came to end resulting in his tragic death but somewhat succeeded in killing Claudius by making him drink the rest of the poison in the cup that was planned to kill…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the occurrence of these events Hamlet is in England, where he has been sent by his mother and uncle to recover from his insanity. Upon Hamlet 's return he discovers Ophelia 's grave and is stricken with grief. Laertes sees that Hamlet has arrived back home and devises a plan to murder Hamlet with the help of King Claudius. The plot will take place in the form of a fencing match, where Laertes believes he can deceive Hamlet with poison and end Hamlet once and for all. The symbolism of poison is significant in “Hamlet” because it was the same substance used by Claudius to kill the first Hamlet (former…

    • 1514 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    His plan failed when the king told him who killed his dad (hamlet) and trick him to stop his war and kill hamlet. laertes wants revenge so bad that he decides to put poison on his blade to kill hamlet.laertes irrational behaviors which stem from his desires for revenge can be explained using principles of behavioral economics. Laertes snap judgments fueled his desire for revenge and blinded him from thinking straight.Malcolm Gladwell a famous book righter rights in Blink. Thin slicing is a easy way to tell how people act. (page 14) in hamlet latest hates hamlet from the beginning.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Before Laertes died from the poison, he told Hamlet that it was the King’s idea. Hamlet became more furious and wounds the King with the sword, and forced the King to drink the poisoned drink. Laertes harmed himself and Hamlet for being angry and only focusing on revenge. On Claudius’ side again, He harmed the Queen for leaving the poisoned cup in the…

    • 1027 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The similarities in “An Invitation to a Murder” and “The Dying Detective” are that both were foul-play mysteries, had premeditated situations, and had evidence based on situational irony. The two stories involved foul-play since both stories had criminal activity. “An Invitation to a Murder” was foul-play as a murder had taken place. Eleanor Abbott was the reason of her husband’s death. When she did not give him the medicine that was needed, which was completed purposefully, the demise of her husband occurred.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This claim, whether true or not, eventually helped play a part in her madness, and thus to her death. Hamlet is to blame or his own death as well. The death of Polonius’ reckless murder greatly angered Laertes who later decided to duel Hamlet with a poisoned sword in revenge. Laertes declared, “I give to negligence... only I'll be revenged most thoroughly for my father” (Act 4, Scene 5, 139-141). A small cut from the poisoned blade was what killed Hamlet in the end.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Blood Motif In Macbeth

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Humans are imperfect and greedy that defines how people act by nature and is manageable to control. Macbeth by William Shakespeare illustrated about how Macbeth comes back from war and wants to throne to his title but Duncan’s son was the throne heir. Lady Macbeth persuaded Macbeth to murders King Duncan resulting in both of them living in guilt of their own horrors and mentality. Shakespeare represents the motif “blood” to show how thoughts are powerful and affects the actions or performances of a person. The motif “blood” stresses out the murder plot and the actual murders that Macbeth has performed and with the help of Lady Macbeth.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays