Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address Summary

Improved Essays
President Abraham Lincoln is one of the most eloquent and effective speech writers to have ever taken office. Ronald C. White Jr. presents Lincoln's Greatest Speech as an argument that Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address is in fact Lincoln's greatest speech. Through Lincoln's Greatest Speech, White applies several literary techniques to his writing in order to present an effective argument to his audience. The arguments he presents in his book uncover a deeper meaning of Lincoln's speech in a captivating way. White uses the techniques of dramatization, parallelism, and format to convince his audience of the importance and significance of Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address that make it Lincoln's "greatest speech". White embodies the hopes, emotions, and anticipation of the American people during the day of Lincoln's Second Inauguration while dissecting Lincoln's speech line by line. White goes beyond the facts and explains the social and emotional characteristics of the American people at that time while giving a dramatization of the day of Lincoln's inauguration. He writes that on the day of the …show more content…
These excerpts mirror what White focuses on in that chapter. The excerpt is presented in a different type than the rest of the chapter and stands out against the remaining uniformed paragraphs. White uses this format not only to make it easier for the reader to know what that chapter will focus on, but also in order to place emphasis on each separate part of Lincoln's speech. As a reader, the words "every drop of blood drawn with the lash, shall be paid by another drawn with the sword" (150) resonated with me due to the specific attention placed on a line that I might have likely skimmed over if it had not been presented in the way it had. White's method proves to be effective in making the reader feel the weight and magnitude of the words used Lincoln's

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, the book Lincoln’s Last Days by Bill O’Reilly and Dwight Jon Zimmerman is an amazing historical story that retells the last days of one of our nation’s best presidents. This book brought together the writing techniques of some of the most famous books and combined it with historically accurate facts and battles. It went into depth describing the assassination plan, and immersed me in its action. Lincoln’s Last Days is, in my opinion, a classic tale that needs to be told for centuries to…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Thomas J. DiLorenzo’s book The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War, the author expresses his opinion on the Lincoln administration, as well as validating the book by breaking up the main focuses of each chapter and briefly explaining his viewpoint in the introduction. DiLorenzo attempts to show a different side of Lincoln that is not discussed or mention in most history books. It is almost as if DiLorenzo takes a side no other professor or historian that has studied Lincoln has thought about or knew existed. Regardless of whether or not DiLorenzo has discovered a revolutionary aspect of Lincoln’s life, it makes for an interesting read.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One of the main differences between Abraham Lincoln’s first and second inaugural addresses was his motivation behind each address. In his first address, given on March 4, 1861, Lincoln was appealing to the South of the Union, to try and prevent their succession from the union, while his second inaugural was a reflection of the past for years and a statement for the future. Before his election in 1861 tensions between the North and South were very high and him being elected president made them higher. In the second to last paragraph of Lincoln’s Address he says “The Government will not assail you. You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors”.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Killing Lincoln is a vivid retelling of the assassination of Abraham Lincoln written by Bill O’Reilly and Martin Dugard. They detail the assassination from multiple viewpoints, including that of the president and his assassin. It could serve as a useful tool for scholars because the information is presented in a clear, chronological format, collected from multiple resources, and addresses some of the speculation and conspiracies surrounding this heinous act. It is written by two authors: Bill O’Reilly and Martin Dugard. O’Reilly is the host of a Fox News program: The O’Reilly Factor.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eric Foner Summary

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This book closely examines Lincoln's writings and speeches and avoids direct engagement with previous Lincoln historians. Eric Foner stated that "His intent is to return Lincoln to his historical setting, tracing the evolution of his ideas in the context of the broad antislavery impulse and the unprecedented crisis the United States confronted during his adult life." (Foner prefacexvii) That being said, Foner said he wanted to isolate Lincoln's exact thinking on slavery at different times in his life, while also trying to break this image of Lincoln that he feels scholars have all given him. Often by referencing Lincoln to themselves, thinking they understand the way Lincoln felt and thought about slavery.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    President Abraham Lincoln was a very articulate man and the Gettysburg Address, while rather short, is extremely powerful. This speech clearly expresses his morals and ideals for the nation and his fellow Americans. Lincoln never calls for a Northern victory because he is striving for more than mere battle victory. He mentions all soldiers who sacrificed for the nation and conveying a larger…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will analyze the similarities and differences between the rhetorical strategies of Benjamin Franklin and Fredrick Douglass. Franklin and Douglass both are similar because they criticize the malpractice of religion in their time and preach the benefits of self-education. Franklin’s and Douglass’ writings are different because Franklin seeks to change individuals’ mindsets, while Douglass wants to change the mindset of America’s white, slave-owning class. Franklin skips over his mistakes to present himself as a perfect role model, while Douglass receives empathy from his readers because he is open and straightforward about his life’s story. In this essay, two similarities and two differences between the rhetoric of each writer will…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Dilorenzo

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Thomas J. DiLorenzo’s The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War, he reveals truths about the United States’ sixteenth president that many people did not know about. There are many myths and sides the American people do not know about Abraham Lincoln and Thomas J. DiLorenzo, exposes the truth in this book. Thomas J. DiLorenzo was extremely critical about President Lincoln’s presidency and called him out on crimes that Lincoln committed and he argued that Lincoln’s view about race released forms of bigotry. DiLorenzo opposes that Abraham Lincoln was far from the great leader that history has made him out to be.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main idea Bennett was trying to project was that Lincoln, though coming off as a sympathetic abolitionist, was actually a close minded white supremacist who only took measures such as signing the Emancipation Proclamation and Thirteenth Amendment as political strategies; not for the good of the black slaves. Bennett’s purpose in writing the article was to convey the newly obtained evidence and express his theories on why this evidence proves Lincoln was a white supremacist. His point of view is that Lincoln valued the concerns of white people before the suffering of the black enslaved Americans. This could be rooted with the fact that Bennett grew up in a segregated society and attended a segregated school under the state system. Although Bennett failed to definitively show that Lincoln was a white supremacist because he favored whites over blacks, Bennett successfully argued that Lincoln was a supporter of white supremacy by providing Lincoln’s hesitation on the signing of the very documents he is famous for, and his non confrontational stance on slavery at the beginning of his term compared to the…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He continues questioning Lincolns morals and states, “when he strangely told us that we were the cause of the war; when he still more strangely told us to leave the land in which we were born; when he refused to employ our arms in defence of the Union; when, after accepting our services as coloured soldiers, he refused to retaliate our murder and torture as coloured prisoners; when he told us he would save the Union if he could with slavery; when he revoked the Proclamation of Emancipation of General Fremont; when he refused to remove the popular commander of the Army of the Potomac, in the days of its inaction and defeat,” (Douglass, F, 1896) This powerful and moving statement identifies the often covered up actions of Abraham Lincoln and uncovers the hidden and supressed ideology that Lincoln had . These awful and self- beneficial acts prove that Lincoln was therefore not trying to abolish slavery for the benefit of black people but rather to further his own ambitions and reputation. Therefore proving that due to white media and historians skewing the reality of what Abraham Lincoln did, the truth of his ambitions were…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Civil War historian, James M. McPherson, in his essay “How Lincoln Won the War with Metaphors,” proves that Lincoln used a variety of metaphors in his speeches and writing to connect to the audience and ultimately win the war. He supports his claim by using repetition of phrases such as “everyone knew what he meant”, the word clinch meaning making an agreement, and the structure of paragraphs that is the story from the Civil War with quotes of metaphors Lincoln used and then an analysis of his metaphors, analyzing the Gettysburg Address by changing it, and by providing many examples of Civil War stories and of Lincoln’s metaphors. McPherson’s purpose is to analyze Lincoln’s speeches and writings in order to predict if his communication…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    His tone in the speech is very different from his first, as it is depressed and passive. He seems very tired, which is shown by this speech being much shorter than his first inaugural address. His purpose is to reflect upon the Civil War as it comes to an end and to encourage the reconciliation of the north and south. Both his tone and purpose are shown through the last sentence of his speech when he says, “With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.” This shows his passive tone because he is choosing to ignore everything that the south has done and move on to healing the country and it shows his depressing tone by his use of phrases such as “bind up the nation’s wounds” and “care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan.”…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Frederick Douglass, a runaway slave and black abolitionist, delivered his speech, “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?” to emphasize the hypocrisy of Independence Day in America. Douglass’s purpose was to gain support from the group of people who have yet to choose one side or the other by pointing out the hypocrisy in the idea of freedom when only a fraction of Americans were truly free. He adopts a frustrated tone in order to convey to America, especially abolitionists, the mistreatments that slaves receive in the South and the lack of change. First, Douglass opens his speech by using rhetorical questions meant to make his listeners think about what the Fourth of July means to not only them but slaves as well.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address was a seminal document in our nation’s history. Lincoln used the opportunity to try and bring a wounded nation back together, employing several rhetorical strategies in his speech. Lincoln wrote his Second Inaugural Address himself. He had already been president for one term and had just been re-elected. He could have used the speech to celebrate himself and his efforts in the war, which was nearly over.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Additionally, the obstinacy of humans refuses to change their plans and most importantly, their values that they preserved their whole life. As presidents of the United States, John F. Kennedy and Abraham Lincoln supported similar ideas for their nation. The style in Kennedy’s “Inaugural Address” and Lincoln’s “Second Inaugural Address” effectively outlines their intentions as President of the United States. The ideas in their inaugural speeches focus on changing the way people think of them and bringing the nation together. The similarities in their speeches fight the obstinacy of the people and bring them together as a nation.…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays