Abraham Lincoln's Great Is Too Great

Improved Essays
Lincoln’s Great Is Too Great It is highly recognized that praise or credit is given upon an individual who has worked for and therefore deserves it. And in that same sense is it greatly admired and praised highly of when you rip only what you sow and not of others work. It will be quite ignorant and frankly unfair not consider the legal abolishing of an individual being a property to another by Abraham Lincoln as an act of little worth because even though it relieved not all blacks from this treacherous act, it nevertheless relived some. However, even though I do recognize that the act did something prominent, it did also in some sense not free blacks from much burden when critically analyzed. This …show more content…
As stated earlier, slavery presents itself in different forms. Whether it be owning a human as property or your negative and unfair attitude towards someone in terms of racism. The assertion that one color is superior to another therefore is a form of slavery. When assessing president Abraham Lincoln’s character, it is very crucial to recognize that he was against slavery yet was racist, his words consistently contradicted themselves, his reasons for helping to end slavery wasn’t from his strong dislike for the act, and lastly, he had a very weak moral and value judgment. Society can advance in technology and in many other sectors of life however, if individuals in that society value gain, hatred and benefits over morals and humane thoughts then that society will eventually get dragged back down. The end of blacks being properties in America did not really mean freedom because deep down many Whiteman still did not recognize and admit that their hatred towards blacks was inhumane and morally wrong. This failure of recognition and acceptance eventually paved its way even into modern society where although blacks aren’t property many still dislike them and feel superior towards them. Abraham Lincoln’s help in ending slavery was important yet what’s even more important would been his valuing of blacks as humans not merely creatures. Actions are good yet morals, values and your attitude towards some is just as good as well. Lincoln states, “I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of Negros, nor qualifying them to hold office….; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the Whiteman and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality.” This statement

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Thomas J. DiLorenzo is the author of the book, The Real Lincoln. A great book in my opinion. DiLorenzo wrote this book to tell about Lincoln’s experience and what he did while he was the sixteenth president of the United States of America. The reason that makes me believe why DiLorenzo wrote this book is that it says in the first paragraph of the introduction, “According to one source, more than 16,000 books have been written on virtually every aspect of Lincoln’s private life and public life. But much of what has been written about Lincoln is myth “(1).…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas DiLorenzo’s book, The Real Lincoln, has given us a fresh perspective on our sixteenth president, Abraham Lincoln. The purpose of the book is to shed light on Lincoln’s true beliefs and motives behind his presidential decisions. Throughout the book, the reader is given multiple examples of Lincoln’s thoughts and ideas that supported his actions. DiLorenzo does a great job at keeping his readers engaged and involved. DiLorenzo is not new to the world of writing.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Grant and Lee is a compare and contrast between their personal lives, political views, and how they would hold oneself. Abraham Lincoln and George Washington are two complete different people from different time periods where one had slavery and the other aimed to abolish it. In a compare and contrast of Abraham Lincoln and George Washington each one having their own personal lives, family, and historical actions, which made up some of their differences. Firstly, Abraham Lincoln was never a person who said that an African American and a white person were equal, but instead said that they were man like them so they should be allowed to obtain property like theirs. In his personal life, Abe had a unique upbringing and adulthood as he lived.…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fact on how democratic or undemocratic Jacksonian Democracy was, can be largely disputed. For one to argue such a point a definition of terms must be applied; democracy is a system of government by the whole population or all the suitable members of a state, generally through elected representatives. For a white man during this time, Jacksonian Democracy was extremely democratic. It was based on the idea that all white men should have the right to vote and that they could freely partake in politics. It was the era of universal white male suffrage and supremacy for the “common man”.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln and Douglass: On the Same Page In the time of the Abolitionist Movement, there were many different statements and positions the people would take regarding a highly controversial issue. Frederick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln are two significant figures of the nineteenth century during the Antislavery Movement. They come from different backgrounds and one would assume they have different views and arguments on slavery, which make their talks of this issue more significant. The historical significance this specific issue has is a catalyst that helps the freeing of slaves and abolishing the act of slavery.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Social Freedom Dbq

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As natural born human beings we have certain rights and freedoms that cannot be taken away. They are our possessions and when someone threatens them or tries to take them away we as free citizens have every right to express our opinions and confront them. When “free” slaves of the north got their natural rights taken away, they however couldn’t voice their opinions because they didn't have social freedom. Social freedom is the right and ability to express your opinions publicly, vote for what you believe in, and get your voice heard. Unfortunately blacks of the north didn't have this right and segregation and discrimination lived on in the north.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Given a scenario in which a person stated they were against slavery at one time but also proclaimed they believed whites were superior over blacks during another time, which side would you think they were on? I would argue that the person was not supportive of abolishing slavery. Abraham Lincoln, the president of the United States during the Civil War, believed that slavery was immoral because he thought African Americans and whites were equivalent. Even though Abraham Lincoln presumed slavery as immoral, he doesn’t deserve the title of the “Great Emancipator.” Lincoln did not consider blacks equal when compared to whites.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When studied carefully, the historical significance of these two documents become very clear. From the significance of the cornerstone speech to the south and their movement at the time, to the significant differing views the north and south had of then president Abraham Lincoln. These documents help provide, at least, a glimpse of some of the issues that were forefront before, during and after the civil war. It is therefore important to be aware of some of the implications of these documents and the effects they might have had at the time. Beginning with Alexander H Stephens’ cornerstone speech, we are able to gain some type of understanding of his thinking and ultimately the reasoning for his support for the secession of the southern…

    • 1071 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Indeed, slavery set the foundation for the conditions in which minorities, especially blacks, live now. There is truly no arguing that racism is real, wrong, and very much present in American…

    • 1579 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery, I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally.” Lincoln is saying that those who support slavery have to experience what the slaves go through in order to be able to pro slavery. Most probably have not gone through being a slave. Thus, the effort to ending slavery will be the moral thing to do and unselfish. Every mankind deserves liberty and equality.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To continue, Abraham Lincoln’s choice caused many issues around the nation, hugely affecting freed slaves’ lives. Like before, Abraham Lincoln abolished slavery, he caused all the freed slaves to live in poverty. However, because they had nowhere to live afterward, they had to plead to their former slave owner for a place to stay. Even though slavery should’ve been abolished, it still caused freed slaves misery. The whites created laws known as the black codes, which gives blacks certain laws they had to follow, or they go to jail.…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analytical Essay on the Emancipation Proclamation The United States of America has had an aggrieved history of slavery about African Americans. African Americans at this contemporary are descendants of Africans who were force from their homeland and brought here in the United States as slaves. During the United States slavery era, slaves were consider properties of their master. At the United States’ constitution convention, it was very much explicit and adhered to by the founding fathers by accounting 3/5 of black persons to be equivalent three persons, that which denigrated black people as human beings. The southern states of the United States were deeply interested in slavery because of their labor on the southern plantations.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edmund Morgan, an American historian and a previous history professor at Yale University, unveils how slavery was able to exist in America while liberty was held at the highest of standards in his journal Slavery and Freedom: The American Paradox. After sifting through the stories of our nations founding fathers and most important men of the American Revolution his discovers that, unlike most other historians, the fopaux we call slavery did not begin as a racist act. Morgan also discovered that while many write off the founding fathers and the original colonists as hypocrites for wanting to live in a free world while depriving others of their liberty that’s not an accurate name to describe them. And throughout Slavery and Freedom: The American Paradox Edmund Morgan explains his realization with the world.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery is a way to degrade African Americans. They degrade them by beating them and making them feel inferior. In the quote Sophia Auld was kind to Douglas but then she turned mean. To all the other people who are not slaves, they see a kind and loving person. They do not know what they do…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Debra Friesen Ms. Higgins English 1301 4 December 2016 Change of Racism Over Time The world has various issues; however, one of the leading issues is being overlooked every day. Racial discrimination is one of the foremost issues in the nation.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays