Difference Between Lincoln's Participation And Foreign Policy

Decent Essays
¬¬Emancipation and Foreign Policy

With the war going bad for the North and the presidency of Lincoln unsure, sought to weaken the South by targeting the slaves. Slavery had been and would be an evil within the United States. Lincoln’s position was that slavery was morally wrong, and that he did not approve of it. He was proponent of one’s hard work, which slavery contradicted that idea (AbrahamLincolnClassroom). Although this fact was more shadowed by how worried he was for the effect slavery had on whites (Preston, 2012). For Lincoln the idea of slavery and how it morally changed his fellow man was of more concern than the freedom of the slaves. Prior to the war Lincoln was engaged in trying to end slavery. He voted and advocated against
…show more content…
This would change later when he was unable to stop the South from declaring secession. As stated before with the war’s current progress Lincoln understood that slavery was a key component to the war. In order to defeat the South, slavery must also be defeated. Starting early in 1862 Lincoln prepared an Emancipation Proclamation, which would free all slaves in rebellious states in war against the Union. His secretary Seward advised him not to do anything yet until a major victory was …show more content…
For Europe there was strong sentiment for anti-slavery in the middle and working class that pressured the aristocrats who supported the South. Along with other cotton supplies opening in India, Britain and France no longer could openly side with the Confederates. In also changing the war’s aim he helped to spur anti-slavery sentiments internationally, which for Western countries would be an important change to be received. By using the Emancipation Proclamation Lincoln had effectively kept outside interference and pushed for abolition support.
The Emancipation Proclamation also reflected Lincoln’s beliefs and is another place that one can observe the effect of religion. As a strong believer of the Constitution, Lincoln felt that all men deserved access to the American dream. Although a strategic move, Lincoln had vested interest in the results of the proclamation. Morally and religiously he wanted the United States to be freed from the evils of slavery (Preston, 2012). As the war drew on he also gained much sympathy for the slaves, the spiritual feeling growing in him that fueled his

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Republican Party Formation

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The south also thought that this was going to influence Lincoln’s decisions over the issue, which many were right to believe for his “growing opposition led him to introduce a law that gradually ended slavery” (Smith). Even though, it gained little support the south viewed this as a preview as to what was going to come in the future if they did not surrender to the north. For putting Lincoln, in charge the blame for the start of the war laid on the Republican Party for they imposed conditions that could not be fulfilled. The south felt threatened and thought “the only way to save slavery was to secede” (Dickinson). The South cornered the Union to respond to a greater conflict on top of slavery.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Expansion Of Slavery

    • 1762 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As a result, plantation owners began to think spreading the slaves out would decrease the rebellious atmosphere. The Kansas-Nebraska act stated that the Missouri Compromise had to be repealed because it did not give the southern portion of the United States enough or equal opportunity compared to the north. This act can be linked as one of the main factors in the creating of the civil war and national sectionalism amongst the north and the south. Sectional division in the Kansas and Nebraska territories began to boil over when anti-slavery sentiments dominated the land. People like Eli Turner wanted to ensure that slavery would not be spread beyond the south.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This hopeful solution never happened and the Civil war began. Lincoln’s platform for antislavery was a process that was meant to take time. Lincoln accounted for a resistance against his stance, but knew civil war could potentially end the United States. This is why Lincoln planned to slowly and systematically eradicate slavery in order to keep the fragile country…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The south tried to say that slaves were happy, but educated, heartfelt attacks on slavery written by people like escaped-slave Frederick Douglass said otherwise. The treatment of slaves varied depending on the owner, but families of slaves being separated and punishments like whipping was common. Though the war may have started as a way to preserve the Union which was breaking after the election of an anti-slavery President, Abraham Lincoln, it turned into a war that would decide the fate of slavery (“Slavery in the United States” 2014). The desire for change is what caused the civil war. The people of the northern states recognized that slavery should not be legal while the southern states wanted to expand slavery to the west.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In effect, there were small-scale wars through these territories between pro-slave and abolitionist factions, which incited an increasingly militaristic view of a coming war. Southerners were concerned that abolitionists would sabotage new slave settlements in the west, which increased hostilities between the north and the South. In this manner, the rationale for a southern Confederacy became a more realistic goal, since the federal government was essentially making it a “first-come/first-serve” style of territorial expansion. This only encouraged a feeling of distrust of southerners for abolitionists, which galvanized a more aggressive militaristic position, especially in the context of secessionist ideology. Therefore, abolitionist sabotage and militarism was a primary catalyst for the southern secessionist movement, since it appeared that the northern federalist government was not willing to provide a means of balancing the issue of slave and free state sovereignty.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Union was anti-slavery so the members in the Union disagreed with the Fugitive Slave Law which went against the Union’s objective, to abolish slavery. To summarize, slavery added anxiety for slaves and white citizens, especially when the Fugitive Slave Act was enacted and it helped destroy the…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Civil War Social Changes

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The North, however, opposed to the concept of slavery. The argument over slavery escalated into a political scale. This caused the two societies to have contrasting views on how the government should be operated. Southerners feared that the culture that they had built would be ruined, and feared of slave uprising. While, “Northerners believed that slavery would escape from Dixie and corrupt and possibly break down the political and constitutional system” (xxiv).…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This war mainly occurred due to the fact that the South wanted to spread slavery across the United States and the North wanted to keep the separation. It is important to mention these controversial movements and failed compromises, because they are the ultimate reasons that the North and the South disputed over the gradual spread of slavery. Plantation expansion was the main reason that slavery thrived, and due to the increasing need for income, the South tried to spread slavery to the North. Since it became obvious that the North was not going to give in, when Abraham Lincoln released the Emancipation Proclamation it sent the South into an uproar of…

    • 2436 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There were a few reasons the north and the south viewed the issue of slavery so differently. The first was political differences. With the two politicians having different opinion, the debate between Lincoln and Douglas was a huge factor between north and south. Lincoln held that slavery was a moral wrong. Lincoln, himself, had slaves but he was very determined to try to free the slaves.…

    • 1917 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Like Lincoln, Johnson was willing to forgive the south, if they promise to support the Union and abolish slavery. This caused the congress to impeach him. If Lincoln was alive, the republicans would have override Lincoln’s vetoes and probably got him impeached,too. Lincoln only wanted to win the war and end slavery. He never wanted to give black people right to vote.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays