I thought that schools should limit online speech because people create hater pages in and outside of school, less gossip about teachers and students would decrease, and fewer verbal aggression conversations. In document C (Source: K.K v.Berkeley County Schools, United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, July 27, 2011. This would be a primary source .) A girl created a hater page, soon school administrators found out about the hater page and had a meeting with the girls parents. After the meeting, “School administrators concluded that K.K (the girl) had created a hate website, ...“ This girl who had made a hate website got caught by school administrators. The inference that I made when I was reading document c was that the girl who had
…show more content…
Murphy and Michael W. Macleod-Bell, “ ACLU Statement Submitted to a Subcommittee Hearing on Cyber Bullying, “Protecting Youth in an Online World,” American Civil Liberties Union Washington Legislative Office, July 15, 2010 This would happen to be a secondary source). “Previously, young people harassed and [scared or threatened] each other 3rd party, through the mail… etc.” A lot of people are ganging up on other people, and bullying them in a lot of ways. Schools should limit the online speech because cyber bullying has gotten worse over the years than bullying in person. There are different forms of bullying, and that a lot of kids are bullied today.
Lastly in document g (Source: Russlyn Ali, U.S Department of Education Office for Civil Rights, October 26, 2010. This would happen to be a primary source). “ In recent years, many state departments of education and local school districts have taken steps to reduce bullying in schools.” State departments are trying to walk through steps to end bullying. The inference i can make about this document is that Bullying might decrease if the State Department get more people into campaigns to stop bullying. In this document I learned a lot of people want to end bullying so we could a get along.
In conclusion i thought “Schools Should Limit Online Speech” because there would be less gossip, verbal aggression, and people wouldn’t be able to create more hater
Murphy and Michael W. Macleod-Bell, “ ACLU Statement Submitted to a Subcommittee Hearing on Cyber Bullying, “Protecting Youth in an Online World,” American Civil Liberties Union Washington Legislative Office, July 15, 2010 This would happen to be a secondary source). “Previously, young people harassed and [scared or threatened] each other 3rd party, through the mail… etc.” A lot of people are ganging up on other people, and bullying them in a lot of ways. Schools should limit the online speech because cyber bullying has gotten worse over the years than bullying in person. There are different forms of bullying, and that a lot of kids are bullied today.
Lastly in document g (Source: Russlyn Ali, U.S Department of Education Office for Civil Rights, October 26, 2010. This would happen to be a primary source). “ In recent years, many state departments of education and local school districts have taken steps to reduce bullying in schools.” State departments are trying to walk through steps to end bullying. The inference i can make about this document is that Bullying might decrease if the State Department get more people into campaigns to stop bullying. In this document I learned a lot of people want to end bullying so we could a get along.
In conclusion i thought “Schools Should Limit Online Speech” because there would be less gossip, verbal aggression, and people wouldn’t be able to create more hater