Gun Control By Stephen E Wright Analysis

Improved Essays
Stephen E. Wright, an author and blogger, feels anti-gun groups fight to restrict a constitutional right. Wright feels anti-gun groups, to no avail, continue to reiterate old arguments (2012, para. 1). He believes a civilian can 't one day become a killer by having access to a weapon. Wright feels that by limiting handgun purchases, more problems will occur. He goes on to say, more guns won 't result in more shootings. While, gun control has been a topic of conversation for more than thirty years, it is his right to have this opinion. Primarily because it is such a controversial topic, having one opinion is unlikely. Many people view gun control differently. Some individuals feel guns are the only solution for their safety, at the same time, others see guns as dangerous. Gun control laws were established to ensure safety, and to please those for and against gun control, and yet, the law pleases no one. Gun control laws will save lives by limiting handgun purchases, as well as, those who conceal weapons and more guns will result in more accidental shootings.
Limitations
Handgun purchases should be limited. When discussing the one handgun per month law, Stephen Wright asks, “If it won 't save any lives but restricts honest gun collectors, is it a good law” (2012, para. 4)? The fact that if there were not gun limitations, the world would be in even more chaos. Gun laws are in place to protect the people. Criminals often purchase legally bought guns illegally on the black market. If there were no limit on how many guns people could buy, there would be a greater increase in criminals using guns for their benefit. The result in criminals having access to extensive amounts of weapons could end in tragedy. Police officers have a system to locate a gun, and to identify the owner. Removing gun purchasing limitations would make their, already difficult, jobs harder. Wright argues that gun collectors should not be penalized by the handgun limitations. However, the limitation is not to punish, but a way to protect people from those who abuse the second amendment. Conceal Limiting those who conceal weapons will save lives. Stephen E. Wright believes, “A normal citizen doesn 't suddenly become a murderer because s/he has access to a firearm(2012, para. 10). In reality, having easier access to a gun, will eventually result in a normal citizen becoming a murderer. The author makes a good point when comparing someone who kills out of anger and full of emotion to someone who kills during self defense (Wright, 2012, para. 10). Nevertheless, murder is murder. Someone who
…show more content…
In paragraph sixteen, Wright points out, “Guns don 't go off unless someone pulls the trigger (2012). Although this may be true, to say, “By properly handling a weapon there is no chance of an accidental discharge that will harm anyone” is illogical (Wright, 2012, para. 16). An accident, in fact, is an unexpected incident. Wright claims there will be zero chances of gun misfire if the gun is secured. Where is a secure place to put a gun? A closet is said to be a safe place for a gun; however, children are adventurous, and could locate a gun hidden in a closet. When given access to a gun the outcome is never certain. More guns bring about more opportunities to kill, whether it is an accident or it is on purpose. Guns are dangerous and should be handled by experienced and trained

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rifle Safe Research Paper

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rifle Safes Provide A Lot of Benefits A rifle safe provides you lots of benefits, such as protection and security, child safety, and proper storage space. These safes are available in different sizes and prices as well as come with a variety of options. Before you invest in this safe, you should get ready with some questions. Where do you want to put this?…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Gun Safes

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    That makes it possible for your spouse or a friend who also stores his firearm…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control has been extremely controversial in society for years. In the essay “Just Take Away Their Guns,” James Q. Wilson argues his view on stricter gun control laws. He writes, “Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns” (Wilson, 1994, p.125). He backs up his statement with the statistics that 5/6 of handguns used in crimes are either stolen or purchased privately. With this being said, he displays that increasing legal restraints on purchasing guns will have little to no effect on the use of guns to commit crimes.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Society has been split into two over whether or not guns should be banned, but there needs to be a solution where both parties can be happy. Anti-gun advocates present reasoning why guns should be banned. McMahan’s main two arguments of why guns should be banned: one, guns in the community creates a more dangerous environment; and two, the police have less of a power to protect citizens when society has guns (Shafer-Landau, The Ethical Life (EL) 390). McMahan explains that communities are not going to be free of crimes with more people carrying around guns, because criminals will be more prepared, efficient, and quicker to grab and shoot their target (Shafer-Landau, EL 392-392). People with guns will be safer than people without guns, because they do not have a gun to protect themselves.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Of Rights

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On one side you have those who are for gun control as gun violence has become a serious problem in America. On the other side of the coin you have American citizens who believe strongly in their right to bear arms as it is a staple of the rights all Americans are granted. In the US, there are roughly 283 million guns in civilian hands. Although this in and of itself does not seem particularly damaging or harmful to anyone, the amount of deaths because of these guns shows otherwise. It has been reported that over 30,000 people are killed each year as a result of gun violence, ⅓ of these deaths consist of people under the age of 20.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Fight against Gun Control “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people”, An argument used by many gun advocates. There are millions of gun owners across America. We use these firearms in our daily lives. Citizens of America use them for self-defense, target practice, hunting, and the most important from a tyrannical government.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    And if it does, do laws that put restrictions on the ownership of guns reduce gun-related crimes? These are the questions that many of our representatives in Congress are asking themselves when they go about voting on gun control laws. The debate about gun control versus the right to bear arms is not new and has been here for many years and it still trudges on today. As seen through this paper, gun control is a complicated issue with many different points…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the course of recent years, Americans' support for rigid gun control laws has been declining even as the number of mass shootings is on the ascent. Gun control is a standout amongst the most forcefully divisive issues in the U.S. today. Envision appreciating a film at the theater or eating a dinner at Taco Bell while individuals surrounding you are conveying stacked arms. In spite of the fact that this may appear to be inconceivable, it is conceivable in light of the fact that the second amendment of the United States Constitution gives residents the privilege to have and convey weapons.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Not the Solution Increased Gun Control in the United States is absurd, useless, and unnecessary. In order to increase safety all throughout the United States time and effort must not be spent towards limiting gun owners of their rights. The tragic rash of school, religious, and workplace shootings has turned up the heat on the public conversation about guns. In nearly all of these cases gun laws would not have stopped the shooters from obtaining a firearm.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Gun Control

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gun control causes a lot of violence and crime in the U.S., there needs to be more restrictions. Make it harder for Americans to purchase handguns, but can carry them as concealed weapons for protection. In the last year, ten thousand seven hundred and twenty eight people died from getting shot by a handgun(Gun-Control Dishonesty). Handguns should only be for protection, not because you want to kill someone. The second amendment states that it is your right to bear arms(Gun Control Costing States).…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of Gun Control

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited

    More rules against who can have guns will make society safer by decreasing the number of drive by shootings and accidental shootings and save lives. These regulations will also prevent many homicides and mass shootings. Lastly, more laws controlling who has access to guns will help save the lives of people dealing with depression or mental illness that are having suicidal thoughts or actions. Other countries, such as Australia, have put these types of gun control laws into action and have experienced very successful results. Since 1996, Australia's deaths caused by guns have gone down by two-thirds and they have not experienced a single mass shooting (Peters).…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Columnist Nicholas Kristof wrote an article titled “Our Blind Spot about Guns,” which was published in The New York Times in 2014. In the article’s context, he “argues that if guns and their owners were regulated in the same way that cars and their drivers are, thousands of lives could be saved each year” (Kristof 161). He incorporates multiple statistics in his essay, provides us with insights from the opposing side, and compares the issue of gun control to one that occurred a century ago: vehicle control. Just in the first two paragraphs, Kristof does not cease to use startling statistics that he is sure will grab our attention. He brings to light the issue of 1921 when vehicle regulations were non-existent which, therefore, contributed to the issue of high fatality rates.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Bitto). But there comes a point where there shouldn’t be firearms in the hands of criminals, drug dealers, fugitives, the mentally unstable, and other unpredictable people who can’t deal with this responsibility (“Shootings Expose...”). There are many cases where this fear of someone handling a gun they aren’t responsible enough. For example, under regulations implemented in 1993, soldier aren’t allowed to carry weapons and caused a mass shooting ending the lives of many soldiers. There needs more regulations taken, but the soldier who fight for our country deserve the right to protect themselves as well (Stockman).…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to a study published in 2012, the number of gun-related murders committed is at its lowest rate since 1981, even with an increased amount of people owning firearms (Gun Rhetoric, 2012). On the opposite side of the spectrum, those that support stricter gun control policies argue that the Second Amendment does not provide an unlimited right to own guns (US Supreme Court). Proponents of more gun control laws state that the Second Amendment is as dated as The Constitution and that it was intended only for militia . Nowhere in the Second Amendment is it explicitly stated that it was created to protect an individual’s right to bear arms (Waldman,…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays