Essay On England Vs Germany

Superior Essays
While democracy is present in much of the modern world, it is difficult to define exactly what democracy is due to the varying ways of governing present in the world. In this paper, I will compare England and Germany according to Lijphart’s models of majoritarian and consensus democracies. In Lijphart’s model, there are two main ideas in which these two systems differ: how easy it is for a single party to take control of the government and how much a party can change policy once they have control of the government. The first includes ideas such as party affiliations of the cabinet, executive-legislative relations, number of political parties, electoral systems, and interest group affiliation ("Constitutional Choices"). The second includes topics of federal unit setup, legislature, amenability of the constitution, judicial review, and bank independence ("Constitutional Choices"). Using these two broad ideas, the democracies of England and Germany are able to be compared. In reference to the ease with which a single party can take control of a government, one can find the English system of government to be a fairly good example. When considering the party affiliations of …show more content…
In the United Kingdom, judicial review of legislation passed by parliament is not present in most cases. The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom is not extremely strong due to the sovereignty of Parliament (Essays, 2013). The Supreme Court can, however, rule on laws that go against human rights or the European Union (Essays, 2013). In Germany, judicial review is present in that the courts can decide whether a law or act by the legislative or executive branch of government goes against the Basic Law (Rupp, 1960). Germany also has both federal and state courts that operate as part of a system (Rupp, 1960). This judicial review prevents laws from being passed that do not follow the Basic

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Bostonistan Case Study

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Since these members of state cabinets can be removed at any time, they are able to check the power of the state without concern of re-election. While, Bostonistan’s may be skeptical of a body of government only indirectly elected by the people its role of revisiting and slowing down the legislative processes emphasizes accountability and putting high value on counteracting the temptation of majoritarianism which diminishes and potentially destroys democracy. To illustrate its effectiveness, over the last half century Germany has not encountered a manufactured…

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are two different systems of a democratic government, parliamentary and presidential, which are seen in multiple countries across the world. World powers such as the Canada and the United Kingdom thrive with their parliamentary system while the United States of America has shown stability and power with their presidential system. While both parliamentary and presidential systems have benefits and drawbacks, parliamentary systems are evidently more democratic because it gives majority of its power to the people by allowing them to call for a vote of no confidence and not setting maximum limits to prime minister term periods. This paper will compare and contrast the two democratic systems, discuss the benefits and critiques of each and finally examine why…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus the principle of judicial review vests the power in US Supreme court to review legislative acts and declare such conflicting acts…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Identifying the reasons why the United States of America’s founding framers established the unique governmental framework is just as important as recognizing them. In a time when the framers were actively trying to quell individual political ambitions and prevent the reintroduction of a tyranny, they turned to the separation of power and checks and balances. The idea was to separate powers across the political spectrum, which would then prevent any one branch from amassing a concentration of power. Also, each branch is granted the power to check any action taken by its cohorts. Furthermore, the fact that the U.S. Constitution was the first written document of its kind only emphasizes the circumstances that the framers could not have drawn from past documents success or failures.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is called judicial review. If a law violates the terms of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has the right to invalidate that law. Because of the judicial review the Supreme Court plays an important role in the well-functioning of the law system. It prevents the different sectors of government to abuse their power.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most Americans, when asked, would probably say that we live in a democracy of some variety. In a 2003 Gallup poll that surveyed 1008 Americans, 70% said they were either satisfied or very satisfied with the way democracy words in the country (Gallup 2003). Historically, apart from the multi-decade interlude known as the Gilded Age, the system of governance in the United States could most aptly be described as a democratic republic. Under a democratic republic, ordinary citizens elect representatives to support their interests in government. But is that still the case?…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the Framers’ disapproval of democracy and their intentions to establish a republican form of government, most, if not all, of the Americans today believe in the system of democracy. Some argue that the U.S. Constitution is democratic in itself, while others argue that it is far from it. In this essay, I will qualify the statement that the U.S. Constitution is a democratic document with two main points. While I concede to the point that the Constitution includes democratic elements such as the Bill of Rights, federalism, and the setup of the House of Representative, the electoral college and the Senate are exemplifies how the Constitution deviates away from the definition of democracy, a form of government that follows the rules of the…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    • Warleigh, A. (2003). Democracy and the European Union: theory, practice and reform. London: SAGE. • Weiler, J. H. H., Haltern, U., & Mayer, F. (1995).…

    • 2829 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The doctrine of judicial review is an integral part of the American judicial and constitutional process even though it is not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. In 1803, in the famous case of Marbury v. Madison , the U.S.Supreme Court clearly and specifically claimed that it had the power of judicial review and it would review the constitutionality of the Acts passed by the Congress. The Constitution of Canada or Australia does not contain any express provision for judicial review yet judicial review has been developed as an integral part of the constitutional process. In England as there is no written constitution the courts have resorted to indirect judicial review. Although courts in England cannot declare an Act of Parliament ultra vires,…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Phillippe C Schmitter and Terry Lynn Karl’s article What Democracy Is… And Is Not has the main goal of providing a common definition of democracy. They first begin by broadly defining democracy, then discussing the procedures of democracy followed by the two operative principles of democracy (1993, p. 50). Schmitter and Karl note that there are many types of democracy that each produce different effects that are contingent on a particular states socioeconomic conditions, state structures and policy practices (1993, p.50). Democracies depend on rulers who “occupy specialized authority roles and can give legitimate commands to others” (1993.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article, “The Perils of Presidentialism” Juan Linz observe that there are few stable democracies that have presidential systems of government. On the contrary, there are many parliamentary democracies and historically, they have performed better. Three major problems of presidential systems can be deduced from his essay; 1) Dual legitimacy, 2) fixed term, and 3) winner-takes-all logic. After explaining all three problems, this paper argues that winner-takes-all logic is as much applicable to parliamentary systems as it is to presidential systems.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Dahl On Democracy

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In modern thought, democracy is considered as the ideal form of governance; it is a tool to usher in freedom and progress to citizens of a state. While the term “democracy” is used liberally to describe a wide array of governing systems, it is assumed that most “democratic” governments share similar principles that highlight individual freedoms. Robert Dahl, in On Democracy, makes his case for the democratic system. Dahl argues throughout the book that democracy should not just be viewed as desirable; democracy is the most viable governing option for the modern state. Therefore, achieving the highest levels of democratization ought to be the goal of all governments that are considered democracies.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    At the very basic level, a democratic structure can be defined as an ‘institutional arrangement for arriving at political decisions in which individuals acquire the power to decide by means of a competitive struggle for the people’s vote’ (Schumpeter 1942 cited in Menocal 2007). The positive relationship between prosperity and democracy has an enduring relationship in the subject of social sciences. Although there does exist a strong correlation, it does not necessarily mean causation.…

    • 1947 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In American politics is conducted within the framework of a written constitution which establishes the powers of the different branches of government, as well as many of the fundamental rights and liberties of American citizens. However, since the Constitution is such a brief document that sets out general principles and in most areas is not very specific in what it means. Therefore, its precise meaning in any particular situation is often unclear. As a result, many of the decisions reached about what the Constitution actually means have been reached by judges whose role it is to establish and interpret constitutional law. It is evident that constitutional law requires constitutional interpretation, this has now become the use of the US Supreme Court.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every nation and country has a way of running itself; a way to govern what is considered lawful and unlawful. In the United States of American, there is a massive controversial debate about whether our democracy is majoritarian or if it is more pluralistic in nature. Some may argue that the mass public, or every citizen in the country, is able to control the government’s actions. Others will state that many groups are able to work together amongst themselves to be able to allow more involvement of the citizens in a majority of the nation’s decisions. Both of these ideas of how our government works are similar in ways as well as different in many other ways.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays