Lifestyle theory’s focal point concentrates on more of the easy mark more or less than the criminal. Concerning the criminal, there is the jointly connection routine activities theory, that emphasizes the insufficiency of individuals and community forms that block corrupt activeness. The principal matter of contention is that easy marks become victims on account of where they reside, in what manner they associate, and additional lifestyle-related changes. (Johnson, n.d.).
In accordance with the lifestyle theory, individuals become easy marks of corruption as a result of not applying knowledgeable or realistic decisions meanwhile employing themselves in public location. Social bearings refer to fellowship, acquaintances, and the surroundings. …show more content…
Social interactions, is within itself a set of decisions. Crime is then established on individuals who intentionally subject themselves to be a part of victimization by way of acknowledging communication with other people or situations inclined to criminal activity. (Brent, n.d.).
Nevertheless, the lifestyle theory deals with the victim, while the routine activities theory deals with the criminal. The two theories are very similar the only dissimilarity is the viewpoint.
Routine activities theory entertains that for an offense to be committed, three factors need to be commenced. The first two factors are simple, an acceptable target and criminal action. The third is the one that likely matters the most which is insufficiency of prevention. The insufficiency can be a result of patrol officers that are unavailable within the area. It refers to lacking in the social structure that would prevent the crime from taking place. (Brent, n.d.).
Pursuant to the routine theory, accountability for the offense depends more on the victim than the individual that actually committed the crime. The most significant determinant is not the existence of the offender, or a bizarre person, instead whether there is probability for the offense to take place. (Brent,
In accordance with the lifestyle theory, individuals become easy marks of corruption as a result of not applying knowledgeable or realistic decisions meanwhile employing themselves in public location. Social bearings refer to fellowship, acquaintances, and the surroundings. …show more content…
Social interactions, is within itself a set of decisions. Crime is then established on individuals who intentionally subject themselves to be a part of victimization by way of acknowledging communication with other people or situations inclined to criminal activity. (Brent, n.d.).
Nevertheless, the lifestyle theory deals with the victim, while the routine activities theory deals with the criminal. The two theories are very similar the only dissimilarity is the viewpoint.
Routine activities theory entertains that for an offense to be committed, three factors need to be commenced. The first two factors are simple, an acceptable target and criminal action. The third is the one that likely matters the most which is insufficiency of prevention. The insufficiency can be a result of patrol officers that are unavailable within the area. It refers to lacking in the social structure that would prevent the crime from taking place. (Brent, n.d.).
Pursuant to the routine theory, accountability for the offense depends more on the victim than the individual that actually committed the crime. The most significant determinant is not the existence of the offender, or a bizarre person, instead whether there is probability for the offense to take place. (Brent,