In completely cutting out one of the larger economic groups, the middle class, I feel that Hardin’s argument looses credibility in that his only variables are the elite and the poor. If the object of his argument is to take a look at the supposed responsibilities of opposing social classes, I feel that on the wide spectrum of what nations are considered rich, middle class, and poor, in focusing on the two extremes of that spectrum, he fails to acknowledge where in the lifeboat scenario the middle class would fall and what their duties to the poor would be. In the piece, Hardin does briefly acknowledge the possible uses and reasonings of the rich taking on the burdens of the poor. He parallels both Christian and Marxists ideals of beings a, “brother’s keeper” and “to each according to his needs.” However, in using these as evidences towards the responsibilities of the rich to the poor, he argues that in doing so, it does away with the “excess capacity” of each nation and would only lead to the ecologic demise, or “swamp[ing]” of that nation (or
In completely cutting out one of the larger economic groups, the middle class, I feel that Hardin’s argument looses credibility in that his only variables are the elite and the poor. If the object of his argument is to take a look at the supposed responsibilities of opposing social classes, I feel that on the wide spectrum of what nations are considered rich, middle class, and poor, in focusing on the two extremes of that spectrum, he fails to acknowledge where in the lifeboat scenario the middle class would fall and what their duties to the poor would be. In the piece, Hardin does briefly acknowledge the possible uses and reasonings of the rich taking on the burdens of the poor. He parallels both Christian and Marxists ideals of beings a, “brother’s keeper” and “to each according to his needs.” However, in using these as evidences towards the responsibilities of the rich to the poor, he argues that in doing so, it does away with the “excess capacity” of each nation and would only lead to the ecologic demise, or “swamp[ing]” of that nation (or