Free Life Of Pi Essays: The Existence Of God

Good Essays
This paper has taught me so many different things about my thoughts on God. When I first started this paper, I did not know if anything would be able to change my opinion. When I started my paper, my goal was to find some proof that there was no such thing as God. Instead, I found many different sides to this complex argument. The Life of Pi tried to make a significant argument of why God did exists. Thomas Aquinas showed me different sides to many arguments about God. Finally, my conversation with Olivia helped confirm my opinions. I do not believe that God exists because there is no higher power that has enough control to influence the entire world.
I completely disagree with everything that the book Life of Pi states because
…show more content…
The first question that I obviously wanted to explore was whether God was real and if it could be proved. I thought that it was very interesting that Aquinas first believed that God was not real because of the comparison between scientific knowledge and faith. As I grew up, the reason that I started to not believe in God as much is because of what I learned in Sunday school vs. what I learned in science class. Once I learned about the process of evolution and how science said that humans were first made, I believed that the theory was much more realistic and the theory I was taught in Sunday school. The first point that Aquinas made was that there was no scientific evidence that God exists and that the only reason we believe that God exists is because of faith. I completely agreed with this assertion, but Aquinas then said a counter argument to this claim. He believed that faith is natural knowledge, thus God must exist. This is the opinion he ultimately decided made the most sense. I completely disagree with this argument because it is completely based off of the fact that faith has to be true. I am okay with other people believing in faith because it is a huge part of many people’s lives. However, I am not a person that is going to believe this. I think that if someone believes that faith is the same thing as natural knowledge, they are going to obviously have strong religious beliefs. However, natural knowledge is not the same thing as faith; they are completely different. As Aquinas’ thinking continued, it talked about issues that one had to assume that there was in fact a God. The next question he asked was whether or not God had a body. Aquinas first believes that God has a body because that is what the Holy Bible says. I was not able to agree with this opinion because the Holy Bible also says

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    My own view on faith is that it is not a strong enough argument for proof of Gods existence. I agree with Dawkins that to believe something to be true there must be some kind of real evidence. I believe that most people would agree that evidence should be required to prove God exists but many people would argue there is no evidence against God’s…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When the proponents of the theory of conflicting truths argue against the existence of God, they seem to interpret it as a knowledge and not a belief proposal, and when they fail to find the knowledge to support the existence of God, then they discredit the same existence. Therefore, their support for the theory is not based on the lacking existence of God, but lack of knowledge to support the existence of God (Hick J. H., 1983). The religious belief that God exists is a common interest for all the religions, but none has a concrete way to explain…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Reason Series Analysis

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    People try to disprove the existence of God all the time. But disproving something is a lot harder than proving something. Science cannot prove that God isn’t real because science can only prove things in our universe and God isn’t in our universe. One thing that really spoke to me in the video was that nothing can come from nothing, and the universe had to have a beginning. After watching this video, I still struggle to fully understand that God has been and will…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Modern Science Vs Religion

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Those who are strong in their faith usually have a hard time accepting that there is a possibility that God or Gods did not create the world how it is today. Those who strongly believe in scientific discoveries and progress also have a hard time accepting that there is a possibility that a God or even multiple Gods created everything living as it is today. There is evidence supporting both belief systems, as pointed out in the texts from which they originate. What the extremists from both parties do not realize or accept is that both ideas can explain the origin of the world and humankind. This non-acceptance of the truth is the result of centuries of religion being in control of society.…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Both sought to prove the existence of God in their writing. And, both of them used the ontological argument, which is an argument not based on the observations of the world, but through natural reasoning alone. But, they both had differences not only in the opinion, but on how to reach a side in an argument. Aquinas very much so believed in God, and using natural reasonings he thought he could prove the existence of God. Aquinas knew that you cannot prove that God exists for someone who does not believe through faith alone.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A Case For Christ Analysis

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I doubt they would ever finish the book to start with to be perfectly honest. I think they would be confused or pushed farther away from Christianity and any relationship to God. For starters, many non-believers tend to not be atheists. I mean Atheists are so hard to win to Christ because they already have a belief that there is the higher power and are stubborn in that, just like any strong Christian would very unlikely be driven to the thought of no God and this world is just it for humanity. In some ways, Atheism makes more sense they Christianity.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    P3: Those who do not believe in a god do not believe that God can guide our morals. C: Therefore, religious teachings are not an infallible source. This would mean that religious teachings are not an infallible guide, because to be “infallible” means to be incapable of error. Due to there being multiple ways to interpret religious teachings that would mean that they are not free of error. To reexamine the argument in favor, I would say that it is a valid argument, because if the premises are true then the conclusion would also logically be true.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    POPPER, KUHN AND LATOUR'S EVALUATION OF THE ARGUMENTS Popper's philosophy is based on falsifiability, thus he would side with Lennox. There are a lot of gaps in the science when it comes to evolution and the origin of life. There are also a lot of phenomenons that Dawkins cannot explain by using pure science, because he believes that the specific explanations have not been discovered yet. Lennox uses falsifiability as his main argument in many situations to counter Dawkins' theories. Lennox uses God to explain all of these phenomenons and because God cannot be falsified by using science, Popper would side with Lennox rather than Dawkins.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Growing up in a religious family I have always been surrounded by the idea of God, however, God’s existence has always seemed unreasonable to me. Religious people’s basis for God’s existence starts and ends with stories told in the Bible and miracles that are factually absurd. Coupled with the fact that scientists have offered facts to prove the causes behind God’s miracles that in fact have nothing to do with God and much to do with nature, finding irrefutable evidence for God’s existence seems very improbable to me. Nielsen’s argument is based on the same idea as Kant and Tolstoy’s argument, that there is a lack of factual evidence for God’s existence however, he comes to a different conclusion. Unlike Kant and Tolstoy, Nielsen doesn’t come to find God, he instead confidently believes humans can lead a meaningful life without the existence of God.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The argument that God brought about the universe is somewhat unconvincing and contradictory. Although the argument lays a clear conclusion, it potentially creates more problems than answers. Many find the argument useless, leaving people nothing, and continuing to question the initial first cause. The single most important objection given towards the cosmological argument lies within the question of who created God? Other than the clear statement that God was the initial cause for all things that exist, it appears God is exempt from causation.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays