In this essay, I will use the life of a well-known public figure and describe why it conflicts with the views of Aristotle in terms of happiness and virtue. The life of this public figure was often praised by others who enjoyed what he represented. I will use the teachings and views of Aristotle to analyze why the life of this figure which was full of wealth, fame and prestige was truly not what it was portrayed to be. Before I begin, I would like to raise this question that will be the basis of this essay: “Are we made happy by what we have in life or by who we truly are deep down inside?”
Robin Williams, a world famous actor, captivated audiences in the roles such as: Peter Pan, Mrs. Doubtfire and Hook. He is known for his sense of humor …show more content…
In same token, his view of happiness is the ultimate end goal of human life. According to Aristotle, happiness also depended on moral virtue. Having moral virtue was a way of fulfilling one’s life. Each individual reaches to find that end of life. In order for a person to be or feel happiness then the person has to live in some form of an active life of virtue, because only this can provide the end in which is sought. He believed that happiness is the action of the soul which is in virtue. Aristotle was convinced that a wide range of actions included both physical and mental well-being. He indicates that what others consider certain actions chosen as a pursuit of happiness, Aristotle believes them as a means or a step of many to the final end. Happiness is thought to be something that gratifies the person’s ability. In other words, if an individual participates in something that is satisfying then that individual is happy. Achieving happiness must compare to balance of pleasure and self-reliance. When a person achieves happiness then they have designed and followed their own virtues and lived out those virtues to the ultimate possibility. Happiness cannot be described by the amount of pleasure. It is both pleasure and pains that an individual experiences in their lives.
In conclusion, reviewing Robin Williams’ life and studying Aristotle’s view of happiness, I would have
Robin Williams, a world famous actor, captivated audiences in the roles such as: Peter Pan, Mrs. Doubtfire and Hook. He is known for his sense of humor …show more content…
In same token, his view of happiness is the ultimate end goal of human life. According to Aristotle, happiness also depended on moral virtue. Having moral virtue was a way of fulfilling one’s life. Each individual reaches to find that end of life. In order for a person to be or feel happiness then the person has to live in some form of an active life of virtue, because only this can provide the end in which is sought. He believed that happiness is the action of the soul which is in virtue. Aristotle was convinced that a wide range of actions included both physical and mental well-being. He indicates that what others consider certain actions chosen as a pursuit of happiness, Aristotle believes them as a means or a step of many to the final end. Happiness is thought to be something that gratifies the person’s ability. In other words, if an individual participates in something that is satisfying then that individual is happy. Achieving happiness must compare to balance of pleasure and self-reliance. When a person achieves happiness then they have designed and followed their own virtues and lived out those virtues to the ultimate possibility. Happiness cannot be described by the amount of pleasure. It is both pleasure and pains that an individual experiences in their lives.
In conclusion, reviewing Robin Williams’ life and studying Aristotle’s view of happiness, I would have