Life And Death In Joe Bonham's Johnny Got His Gun

Improved Essays
The Hippocratic Oath is one of the oldest binding documents in history. It was written by the physician Hippocrates and despite being written centuries ago, many doctors still take the oath and use it to guide them in the ethical practice of medicine. It states “First do no harm.” Throughout history, doctors has done as much as they can to treat and keep their patients as comfortable as humanly possible. But this line of reason begins to blur with the issue of physician assisted suicide. Joe Bonham, the main character in the novel Johnny Got His Gun, wakes up in unfamiliar surrounds to find out he 's a blind, deaf, and mute, quadriplegic. His doctors refuse to euthanize him and is left to live bedridden, occupied only by his own thoughts that drive him mad. In the case of Joe Bonham, it was wrong to keep him alive.

The Hippocratic Oath states that when treating patients, physicians will “First do no harm.” It goes on to states that “I will give no deadly medicine to anyone if asked nor suggest any such
…show more content…
death but the manner of dying. Patients deserve the right to take purposeful action in deciding how they end their lives. Doctors should feel obligated to follow the wishes of the patient because the decision is all about the patient, not the doctor. Joe in Johnny 's Got His Gun felt the doctors prize themselves in being able to keep him alive. “He was probably a very famous guy by this time and the doctors were beginning to make pilgrimages. One doctor was probably saying to the others you see how we were able to do it? You see what a clever job we did? You see where the arm came off and you see the hole in his face and you see he still lives? Listen to his heart it 's beating just like your heart or mine. Oh we did a fine job when we got him. It was a great piece of luck and we 're all very proud.” (158) We instead need to look at the patient 's role rather than favor doctors that prize their self-image above the patient 's

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    From Dalton Trumbo’s novel, Johnny Got His Gun, a 15-year old boy and his father travel to one of their most cherished places during childhood, a lake 9,000 feet above sea level. This time, though, rather than spending every moment with his father, the boy now wishes to hang out with one of his friends, Bill Harper, instead. The special bondage between the young man and his father is now steadily quieting itself as the young teen feels a sense of abandonment and guilt towards his old man. With this being said, Trumbo, the author, utilizes a limited point of view, an intricate tone, and selection of detail to relay the fact that there are times in life where a transition is inevitable and that one must come to an understanding of those feelings…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death With Dignity: A Commentary Sergej Jagodin Millersville University Medical Aid in Dying: A Commentary The ability to choose when to die is not a topic that is heavily discussed throughout a person’s life. What constitutes dying early and on one’s own terms? Is it moral? Is it right?…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thousands of people died during the Holocaust due to medical experiments and poor doctoring. To be a doctor during the holocaust had to be German and part of the Nazi party. They did not take their Hippocrates Oath seriously, and commonly seemed to act the exact opposite. Doctors would also decide who was fit to work and who wasn't. They also sterilized the workers or terminated pregnancies.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever gone through agonizing pain and suffering before? Gone through hell hours? For days? Or even for weeks? Have you gone to the important decisions of telling your loved ones that you 've decided it’s your time already?…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A common moral argument against Physician Assisted Suicide is that it disobeys the Hippocratic Oath: the set of moral guidelines for any doctor or administrator of medicine. The section which is specifically referenced by such opponents is “Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course” (INSERT CITATION). However, the Hippocratic Oath (the original version, in particular) fails to provide an effective basis for opposing PAS because it is irrelevant to modern medicine. One…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This leads to the sixth argument against physician-assisted suicide, which is the Hippocratic Oath to do no harm. Physician-assisted suicide is said to violate this oath that every doctor must take. The Hippocratic Oath argument has been deemed contradictory. For example, the United States would rather accept removing a ventilator by the wish of a patient, but when a physician prescribes a drug that a patient voluntarily takes, society does not find it acceptable. A physician that prescribes the drug is actually doing it within the Hippocratic Oath.…

    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If it is a physician's job to do no harm, and a patient is in constant pain is it not the more merciful action to take to make the patient finally at peace. Whether it be merely suggesting aided death as an option or prescribing the lethal dose of medication, physicians should feel obligated to have this legalized for their patients. “ As it is stated in this article the author says that the Hippocratic oath says a physician will do no harm, that harm may include prolonging a life of a dying patient. Yes, it is a physician's job to heal and to make a patient's life as long as possible, but are they really following their oath when a patient is asking for death” (Bloustein). Some say this is ethically wrong for a doctor to make the respectful…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Do No Harm Analysis

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The article in the New York Times titled, On Assisted Suicide, Going Beyond “Do No Harm”, by Haider Javed Warraich, explains how modern medication, along with medical equipment designed to keep patients alive have made it nearly impossible for patients to die, unless doctors or family members withdraw treatment. He further explains how doctor’s adherence to the Hippocratic oath “do no harm” is used to advocate for keeping patients alive. He suggests that doctors may be doing harm by not allowing the patient the right to choose how they prefer to end their life. He believes that doctors should be open to providing patients with options to end their life. Euthanasia continues to be a controversial topic within our society.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ntroduction The Legal right to die describes in any situation of an adult who is in state of sound mind to decide about his or her treatment to be continued or not, where such voluntary, informed decision is made, should be recognized and respected. According to Lord Goff of Chieveley in 1993, at p. 864, in Airedale NHS Trust versus Bland [1993], the House of Lords held that “The principle of self-determination requires that respect must be given to the wishes of the patient. If an adult patient of sound mind refuses, however unreasonably, to consent to treatment or care by which his life would or might be prolonged, the doctors responsible for his care must give effect to his wishes, even though they do not consider it to be in his best interests to do so. […] To this extent, the principle of the sanctity of human life must yield to the principle of self-determination”.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Should I Help My Patients Die?”, Jessica Nutik Zitter, a critical care and palliative medicine doctor at Highland Hospital, argues that special qualifications and training should be required for doctors to perform the lethal injection in order to guarantee that each patient gets properly evaluated and the doctor does not feel the emotional distress that comes with making this decision without proper training. Zitter describes how she felt when her first patient asked her for the lethal medication, while she understood their medical prognosis and that it was their legal right to request it from her; she asked herself was it still fair for her to say no? Another problem that she brings up is that the procedure is not covered by…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide Essay Outline I. Introduction - There is a controversial debate throughout the United States for the last decade regarding physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill patients, many believe having a Doctor prescribe a self-administered lethal drug to a patient is diminishing the value of life. While others believe this method should be the patients’ right to choice when the pain and suffering from a life threatening illness should cease. II. Main Point # 1 - Will Physician-…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This means that the patient chooses to die, but the physician is the one who ends their life. An example of this is if a patient requests a doctor to give a lethal injection due to being competent and in pain. A person who is terminally ill might choose this if they are sick of being in treatment…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Human life doesn’t need to be extended by every medical means possible, but a person should never be intentionally killed.” says Ryan T. Anderson of Heritage Foundation, but he is completely wrong because if the patient wants to live no longer and gave consent, or their parents or children, to dying, then a doctor or medical professional should be obligated to give them what they request if there is no hope for a cure for their illness or they feel that they are too old to continue to live. Ryan continues to say, “Doctors may help their patients to die a dignified death from natural causes, but they should not kill their patients or help them to kill themselves.” A death from medication or lethal injection is just as natural as a dose of radiation…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays