Life After Death Reflection Paper

1349 Words 6 Pages
Starting from ancient times, there has dependably been a level headed discussion in the field of logic, of whether people keep on living after death. The debate brings discussion brings up on an issue of whether it is feasible for a person to have recollections of his or her life before death if at all there is life after death. Another question is if an individual conveys his personality to the next life after dying . A person identity would be imperative in recognizing if the person that passed is the same person living after death. The key issue in this argument is in what shape an individual exists in life after death. The primary major contrast between what Plato and Aristotle thought about the relationship between the Body and Soul. The …show more content…
Plato thought this to be genuine due to his hypothesis of structures. Plato thought we had such thoughts on a ‘perfect circle, ' not because we have seen them before or they had been portrayed to us. Plato hypothesis indicates that our Soul had as of now carried on with an existence because of forms and as the body experienced things this opened memory from that universe of forms, because of this the body and mind perceives objects. Plato trusts that the human individual has distinctive components: the physical body; the psyche; and the eternal Soul (reason, soul, and appetite). The Soul and Body as Plato believed aren 't two separate substances, yet are diverse parts of a similar question. Plato additionally recognized the human soul with four cardinal virtues. Those ethics are temperance, courage, wisdom, and justice. Temperance is restraint; A healthy soul not controlled by appetites. Courage is important to control our fears. Wisdom happens when rational part of our soul is healthy and in control. Justice is then the aftereffect of each of the three working amicably. Plato thought the spirit was everlasting. “The soul of man is immortal and imperishable.” Plato does not clarify which part of the spirit are immortal. Aristotle disagreed with Plato abut this. He felt that the Soul was a part of the Body, it was made with the Body, the body upheld it and when the body …show more content…
He trusted that the soul was embedded inside a human yearning to return back to the "forms". The soul in the conclusion of Plato is immortal and constant . It is the main connection between humans and understanding. The second part of a person is the body. Plato recommends was the physical part empowering us to perform actions such as communicating. Framing the external appearance the body utilizes faculties to make feelings about the physical world in which it has a place. However as Plato would see it couldn 't come close “world of the forms’ in any capacity Because the body is continually

Related Documents