Karl Marx And John Stuart Mill's Definition Of Liberty

Great Essays
Liberty as a concept is difficult to define due to its ambiguity and the diversity of its meaning and interpretation by specific individuals. The indistinct conception of liberty is highlighted by disparity in the views and works of Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill. Mill’s definition of liberty is complex and he approaches it from different sides throughout his text. Mill’s liberty principle is concerned with protecting the individual from the intrusion of society. According to Mill, the individual has the right over his freedom and the freedom to express one’s independence needs to be protected. It is in this sense that liberty is used throughout his excerpt. In regard to Marx, the concept of liberty is used interchangeably with the concept …show more content…
The Communist Manifesto is the core place for Marx to try and influence change in terms of arguing for the freedom of the proletariats. This freedom is from the capitalists whom have subjugated the proletariat to a low state where their life, relations, and the world around them has become essentially meaningless. Marx states that from the moment when individual property can no longer be transformed into bourgeoisie property, into capital, from that moment, you say, individuality vanishes (Marx and Engels 1978, 486). From Marx’s communist perspective, it seems that his aim is to eradicate the individualistic method of thought. Essentially what is delineated in the Communist Manifesto are the steps to be taken for the working class to be free from the oppression they have endured. Marx highlights this oppression by giving one example where he claims that the bourgeoisie, wherever they have got the upper hand, has…left no remaining nexus between man and man than naked self-interest…it has converted the physician…into its paid wage laborer (475-476). How then, does the proletariat obtain

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Just like Rand’s Equality trying to rediscover individuality, John Stuart Mill in his book On Liberty argues about the individuality of mankind. Near the beginning of the book, Mill states his thesis of Individuals having the right to thought. He continues, arguing that the right of thought is not unique to one person nor another in…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, the Communists have come together to write the Communist Manifesto, so that their thoughts and theories can be published for the public. The first section of the Communist Manifesto introduces many important ideas. One of the main topics in this sections is Marx’s thoughts…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ashli Trammell PSR#4 RE-WRITE John Stuart Mill was a philosopher that wanted to justify the freedom of an individual under state control. He wanted to make a contribution to the progress of human individuality and freedom. Mill believed that people had no control over their own political power. The people had all the power once their will progressed and the majority had all the power.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Mills Harm Principle

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mill does not see this and does not accept it. He refuses to acknowledge that by giving up some freedoms means the potential gain of state protection. Today, we view this protection, provided by the government, as a freedom. It allowed society to live their life in peace and, not be afraid to go out and be…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This essay will compare and contrast two highly revered political philosophers, Freidrich Hayek and John Stuart Mill. Hayek and Mill are widely known for their work on the philosophy of liberty. It is important to compare and contrast these thinkers because of the impact they still have on society today. Hayek is a classic negative liberty thinker, basing his views on the importance of the lack of outside interference on a man pursuing his own will. Mill, however, is a positive liberty thinker, basing his opinions on a man being his own master and attaining his highest possible self.…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do certain qualities, lifestyles, morals or even physical characteristics determine who is free? And finally, how do we progress in the name of freedom through society and its members? Patel, Plato, Mill, Marx and Le Guin offer insight, and possible solutions to such pressing questions. Mill stated that his book On Liberty is “about the importance, to man and society, of a large…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First the citizens must give themselves up to the law of the society, they must allow restrictions and limits to be placed upon them for the society to run effectively. Secondly the citizens must put themselves under the protection of the society and trust that they will be defended and taken care of. When this trust is given to the society and the government then they can effectively protect and ensure “the peace, safety, and public good of the people. This is contrary to what Mill would argue as he does not believe citizens should submit themselves to society and give away their rights. He believes that as an individual citizen you should fight for your opinion and never give into society.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In order to guarantee the loyalty of its members, the law should also appropriately protect the individual freedom of its people. In regards to Mill, it appears that he somewhat agrees with Rousseau’s argument of the function of government. Mill argues for a representative democracy that would facilitate the development and evolution of liberty for its members. He believed that a representative democracy would only represent the interests of its people and would therefore lessen the resistance between the ruler and its people. Mill…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s’ essay also argues that freedom of speech and diversifying opinions act as a fuel that drives social progress. Mill states, “... the only unfailing and permanent source of improvement is liberty, since by it there are as many possible independent centres of improvement as there are individuals” (Mill 65). One can gather that Mill believes that liberty is necessary for improvement and the more liberty present in individual members of society the more persons influencing change. This is an important message for our society to receive and is in accordance with our liberal democratic society. It demonstrates the importance of individuals and how their freedoms positively contribute to society because, as Mill bluntly states, without individuality…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, it can be concluded that Mill expanded individual liberty boundaries to their maximum through developing the sole above exception and provided an individual with a scope of actions that is large. In comparison, Plato views human liberty notion within an ideal state pattern. This is to imply that Plato describes personal independence and individual freedom according to the utility it accords the entire society. This means that a person belonging to the polis can be termed as a free person if they act according to the society’s objectives, as well as for the advantage of the whole state (Klosko, 2006). It is worth noting that human liberty according to Plato pegs the social division into classes, categorized according to an individual’s ability to meet defined functions.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Originally, Mill’s essay On Liberty appears wordy and full of repetition; however, it is this use of repetition which aids in proving his point of individualism. As a cautious writer, Mill explores not only his argument about society’s control over an individual, but also the counterargument.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin On Liberty written by John Stuart Mill, chapter one is focused on an introduction to his meaning of Liberty. Mill explains that his purpose is to explain liberty dealing with civil and society and not “liberty of the will.” Liberty was first founded on the concept of protecting society against tyranny. His wanting to limit the power of the leaders in tyranny because while it was necessary to tell people what can and cannot be done, it is also seen as dangerous. Mill used the analogy of weak members being preyed upon by vultures.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs Rousseau Analysis

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill the liberal and Jean-Jacques Rousseau the republican, are two political philosophers whom focussed on the integration of political liberty with the relationship found between that of the individual, society and the state by the means of power or authority. Both of these political thinkers formed their arguments in their writings, namely; On Liberty (1859) by Mill, and The Social Contract (1913) by Rousseau. On a more specific scale, their views differed in much contrast, whereby Rousseau claims that people and individuals of society may only acquire the entity of freedom through a transitioning process from the natural state to the civil state, whereby they would have to conform to the general will as the common good. On the…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Comparing Rousseau and Mill on Liberty In this essay, I would like to contrast and compare the concept of liberty in Jean Jacques Rousseau's “the Social Contract Theory”, which was written in 1762 and J.S. Mill's On liberty, which was written in 1859. In a fact, the authors were born different century and also, had different ideas. They were successfully influence the society by sharing their ideas. In the writings, both Rousseau and Mill mainly discourses about the relationship between authority and one's liberty. First, I would like to examine both Rousseau's and Mill's schemas and then compare their thoughts.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays