Why Liberals Are Wrong About The Constitution

Improved Essays
“The Liberals and Conservatives have expressed that they support the Constitution, and the values symbolized in it, but they frequently fight about the government’s power when it comes to criminal justice, moral regulatory, the economic regulatory powers and its war powers (Lentz, T.,2013).” Liberals are very easily angered when someone accuses them or suggests that they do not understand or support the Constitution. Unfortunately, Liberals have stopped believing in the principles of the Constitution but the reasons why are not clear. We must now try to figure out why Liberals are wrong about the Constitution. There are several reasons why Liberals are wrong about the Constitution. Liberal says that they do not like the Constitution because they feel that it is a puzzling and rigid document that only a person of higher learning (i.e. professor, scholars, Ivy Leaguers, etc.) can understand it Liberals believe that the Constitution should be explained according to the current social changes and expectation. “The Constitution had become so irrelevant to liberals that when former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was asked, regarding Obamacare, where in the document Congress is granted the power to force people to buy health insurance, she asked incredulously, “Are you serious? Are you serious (Troia, …show more content…
Liberals are wrong when they say that the Constitution is a rigid document that does not evolve with time because there have been 27 amendments to the Constitution since it was ratified in 1789. Liberals fail to see that these amendments were ratified because of the nation’s changing needs are different than when it was created in the eighteenth century by our

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The current Constitution allows for an amendment to be passed with ⅔ votes from both chambers of Congress and also with ¾ of the state’s approval or with ⅔ of the state legislatures calling for a convention. Sabato’s view on calling a convention is interesting in that his interpretation of a state’s petition to call a Constitutional Convention never dies as well as the visual of a light on, light off policy. Proposed amendments that a state switches it’s light on for will remain on until they reach 34 states with their lights on or until the state shuts it’s light off. This visual allows for a Convention to be called the moment the 34th state light went on, meaning a Convention could be called promptly. The one area Sabato says needs to be addressed is the lack of a standardized way of submitting applications for an amendment or convention.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles Kessler, a professor of government, speaks about the theme of the fate of the tea party movement, the Constitution, and the future of conservatism. Kesler believes the Tea Party was a non-popular movement, which was carefully organized through the Sons of Liberty to strike against taxes on tea. It was an act of civil disobedience, and wants to be a main part of conservatism and an ongoing movement. The Tea Party was right in its diagnosis of the problems of American government and conservatism, but wrong in its prescriptions. One thing all the Tea Party senators and congressmen have in common is the sense that Obama Care is not just another piece of legislation, it threatens to spoil our medical care system and to begin to undermine…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Dbq

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I believe the fact that there can even be amendments to the Constitution alone means that it is not a fixed document. If it can be changed over time due to flaws found within, then the interpretation of the document should also be able to change over…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A hot debate relevant for today is the question of how the constitution is to be interpreted. When writing the constitution, the founding fathers were clearly living in an ern which entailed concerns that are different from concerns today. During the constitutional convention, men discussed debated until they agree on what should become the framework for our great nation. Because of this the constitution appears to be ambiguous on many particular issues which we face today. Are we then to address those issues in light of the context in which the constitution was written, or are we to view it as a living document that’s meaning changes with time?…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years, there have been many debates regarding the constitution. One common debate being whether or not the constitution is flexible enough to live through the generations. Jefferson, a founding father, has stated, “The Constitution belongs to the living and not the dead.” This statement does allude to the longevity of the Constitution, as can be demonstrated through the amendment process, the elastic clause, and judicial review. The amendment process has allowed the United States government to amend the Constitution.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the ratification debates of the US Constitution, there was conversation over the necessity of a bill of rights to define people’s rights and limit the government’s powers. Many federalists believed such a bill of rights would not only be unnecessary, but would weaken the constitution and the people, and give the government powers they should have. Noah Webster, Alexander Hamilton, and James Wilson each make arguments against a bill of rights. Webster argues that a bill of rights may be irrelevant in future generations, but people will be reluctant to change or add to it. Hamilton believes that the bill of rights is unnecessary because the constitution itself is in terms a bill of rights.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Franklin D. Roosevelt had the intensions of bringing back the founding fathers intentions of the constitution after the civil war had ended. Martin Luther King Jr. pushed and fought for equal rights for African Americans, Lyndon B Johnston wanted to continue on Roosevelt’s ideas of quoting the constitution, Clinton tried to change taxes. These examples may have done good things that have changed the American society, but they did not prove they do not prove that the liberals understand the constitution better than the Conservatives. The conservatives on the other hand, certainly understand the constitution better than the liberals not only because they are the ones who wrote the constitution in the first place, but because the country was founded on a republican foundation. For example, the Tea Party protected the constitution for the benefit of republicanism and this…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carol Berkin is a professor of History at Baruch College, and she teaches early American and women’s history. A BRILLIANT SOLUTION: Inventing the American Constitution is a book that involves the independence of United States of America. The years after the Rebellion were the greatest years and the most terrible periods. Even if the nation is eminent their newborn liberty, they did not have a strong central administration that would connect them mutually (Berkin, 2002).…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There is no denying that the United States Constitution is a living document, that is in itself the foundation by which this country is to be governed. No matter ones position on contemporary and pressing social, economic and political issues, the Constitution is the guide and standard. Unfortunately, as a living document, it is open to interpretation by those who seek to use it to suit their purpose. For example, even preceding the 21st Century, the historical document has been used as a weapon, with the user selecting the pieces that best suit their case, similar to using one verse from the bible to make a case when in reality it has been taken out of context.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a document written many years ago, it has been interpreted in different ways, which makes it a living document. “The proper role of the Supreme Court, it is said, is to interpret the Constitution, not rewrite it” (Shaman, 2001). As a living document “We the People” attempt to use the words of the constitution to benefit us, both in a negative and positive manner. Past, present, and the future pose a disadvantage to the written constitution. Attempting to change the Constitution of the United States will take a long process and time, therefore interpreting the constitution makes it easier for the…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Federalist Alexander Hamilton regarded the Constitution as the fundamental law, which is superior to any state statute, and as a limited Constitution. In Federalist Paper Number 78, Hamilton argues that the Supreme Court should have the authority to invalidate acts of Congress that are deemed unconstitutional, and that if there is a variance between the Constitution and a law passed by Congress, federal courts have the responsibility to follow the Constitution. Paper Number 78, having been cited in thirty-seven Supreme Court opinions as of April 2007, has had an immense influence on the debate regarding the interpretation and application of the Constitution (Coenen). Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is an advocate of textualism, arguing that the meaning of the Constitution lies in the words of the document, and that the Constitution should be regarded in favor of its “original meaning”. Justice Stephen…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let us now consider the other side of the coin, the argument in favor of a dead Constitution. In 2008; Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said at the Manhattan Institute, "Let me put it this way; there are really only two ways to interpret the Constitution -- try to discern as best we can what the framers intended or make it up. No matter how ingenious, imaginative or artfully put, unless interpretive methodologies are tied to the original intent of…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He goes on to say that it is unrealistic for text, that is the foundation of the country, to hold up forever. Based on the fact that the writer of the Constitution believes in a “living Constitution”, it is reasonable to think that it was written with the intention of evolving. However, have the words of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights been interpreted differently since their creation? The best way to track this, is to follow Supreme Court cases dealing with the Fourth Amendment, as our technological world progresses. Olmstead v. United States and Katz v. United States are two similar cases, that exemplify the progression of the Fourth Amendment.…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Elder Oaks, there are at least two main parts of the constitution that were not inspired. He personally didn't feel that the compromise concerning slavery, and the age and citizenship minimums for presidents, senators, and congressmen were inspired. . As we have read in previous lessons concerning the compromise of slavery, some of the delegates that met at the convention were in favor of slavery. In the constitution, we find that it acknowledges the existence of slavery with the ⅗ compromise but it doesn’t resolve the issue.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How wouldn't you feel if we didn’t have a government to hold power or enforce rules? What if we didn’t have any rules what would our world look like? Our country has freedom of a lot of things. If we didn’t have a constitution our world would be careless. The constitution is a big part of America and still functions today with our government.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays