Liberalism In Immanuel Kant's The Perpetual Peace

Improved Essays
Immanuel Kant was arguably the greatest classical liberalist theorist, influencing the majority of works in the period of Enlightenment, most notably of those on epistemology, with a lasting effect on philosophies that came after his own. Kant’s idea for perpetual peace came in the form of an essay, titled ‘The Perpetual Peace’, detailing a prophetic discourse of eternal, universal peace that was investable and conceivable, before his time and subsequently after (Friedrich 1947, p.10). Kant’s writings developed after Europe’s Fascist and National Socialist movements ended, resulting in a Charter for perpetual peace, achievable by a treatise itemising a new world of United Nations (Friedrich 1947, p.10).
In his essay, Kant satirically tells
…show more content…
Yet Doyle argues that Kant’s philosophies are the best explanation for peace. Doyle contends that the loss of liberal states to aggressors such as the hegemonic US threatens the liberal peace in Kant’s cosmopolitan world, as liberal states need each other’s provision to ensure peace (Doyle 1983, …show more content…
This league would uphold vital moral standards needed for man to achieve peace, and be a body of reason and delegation for times where global authority is needed. Kant’s belief that perpetual peace was achievable and inevitable, just like progress in man’s abilities, it would be a long but rewarding progression, yielding results in the future. Kant posits that trade cannot coexist with war, and sooner or later this all of man will be affected (Kant 1983[1795], pp. 125[368]) ‘…as long as these powers belong to a nation, financial power may be the most reliable in forcing nations to pursue the noble cause of peace (though not from moral motives); and wherever in the world war threatens to break out, they will try to head it off through mediation, just as if they were permanently leagued for this purpose’ (Kant 1983[1795], pp.125[368]). Kant’s perpetual peace would occur through unintentional effects of man’s self-interested actions, with no intention of perpetuating peace, yet nature would cause these effects of ill-morals to be in favour of perpetual

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Kant's Perpetual Peace

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kant’s essay ‘Perpetual Peace’ aims to provide the ideal conditions and institutions required to achieve long-term peace. Whilst Kant offers reasonable preliminary articles, they are inapplicable to the modern era of increasing military technology, economic interdependence, and human rights discourse. Kant further proposes concrete institutions, however, they are limited by: his universalistic notion that all Republics will avoid war regardless of national histories, his proposal of a federation without coercive powers and his undeveloped cosmopolitan institution in which he overlooks how national interests and his own liberal disposition affect the cosmopolitan goal for peace. Finally, whilst Kant projects history as progressing, he does not…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These are Schumpeter’s liberal pacifism, Machiavelli’s liberal imperialism, and Kant’s liberal internationalism. One of the key arguments made here is that the differences among these subcategories is the result of theorists’ differing ideas of the citizen and the state (Doyle 1986, 1151). The baseline of liberal pacifism is that people are “rationalized, individualized, and democratized” (Doyle 1986, 1162). Liberal imperialism, on the other hand, relies on imperial expansion, as people are constantly in fear of other states and therefore seek to be the ruling elite. The final subcategory, liberal internationalism, states that people are “rationalized and individualized,” and see people as moral equals (Doyle 1986,…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant effectively quantifies freedom via his argument for his idea of enlightenment, public/private divide, trade off between rational and physical productivity and finally international governance. He runs into problems however in that he fails to effectively quantify the means of acquiring his aspirational goals of perfect moral constitution, universal enlightenment as well as global cosmopolitan governance. The following section will outline first the public private divide followed by means not considered (harm principle) and the second section will outline the means towards global cosmopolitanism as well as the limitations considered.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The League of Nations was introduced to keep peace between countries throughout the world after World War I. All nations were supposed to be members of the League and if any conflict occurs between countries they were to negotiate instead of war. If the League fails then the countries were to stop trading with hostile countries and if it fails then countries could use their army to fight. One reason of its failure was that not all countries joined the League. Germany was not allowed to join the League because of their punishment for World War I. Russia was excluded because of Communism and United Sates didn’t agree to join the league. Another reason was that the League had no powers. League could only ask countries to stop trading with the hostile countries. Some countries could still trade with non-member countries. League of Nation failed also because it had no army. Member countries were to provide soldiers. Another reason for the failure was that the league was unable to act quickly to problems. Japan was in depression in 1931. People asked army for help and to invade Manchuria. China asked League for help, and Japanese government told the army to leave Manchuria, but the army did not leave. The League asked all countries to stop trading with Japan, but many countries did not stop trading because of the depression. When Japan was asked to leave Manchuria, Japan decided to leave from the League and decided to allies with European countries. Italy invaded Ethiopia because of Mussolini’s desire for fame in Europe. The League told member states to dictate trade with Italy. Italy was still able to trade with non-member states. Mussolini allied with Hitler. Japan and Italy allied with Hitler which led to World War II because of League of Nation’s poor…

    • 1056 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    League Of Nations Dbq

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A revolutionary, but flawed man, President Woodrow Wilson blamed Europe’s fragile infrastructure on its dependence on a balance of power, and so he proposed his Fourteen Points at the Paris Peace Conference and with it the groundworks for an effective peace with the creation of a League of Nations. The League would serve as an international parliamentary system responsible for the maintenance of peace through a system of collective security, whereby external aggression against a member nation would be perceived as an act of war against the whole body of nations. A new world order led by the League of Nations, Wilson argued, would see Europe peacefully through the 20th century. However, Wilson’s greatly underestimated the influence of the reactionaries…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    League Of Nations Dbq

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On January 10, 1920, the League of Nations was created. It was created as a result of WW1 from the Paris Peace Conference. It was based in the country of Switzerland in Geneva. If the League was more reliable and developed superior, there could’ve been conflicts that would have been avoided between countries and overall benefitted opposing regions. Countries such as Manchuria would have no been invaded along with the expansion in Abyssinia.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    As most great speakers do, Wilson saved perhaps his most intriguing point for last; the forming of the League of Nations. Wilson became a leading advocate for a league of nations in 1916 and believed that it was critical to maintaining world peace. The league would prevent special interests from overriding the common interests of the world, punish aggressors, and provide a forum for the peaceful settlement of international disputes. The real purpose of the League of Nations was to dilute national sovereignty and replace it with a global…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberal Peace

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Doyle within his writing, is trying to explain liberal peace between liberal states and the complexities within this. Within Doyle’s writing, the two issues that seemed to be most apparent were (1)peace between liberal states is easier to maintain; (2)Kant has the best explanation of why peace between liberal states is possible, compared to other ways of thoughts. This could however be critiqued by looking at, (1) Doyle’s failure to explain further how social democratic liberalism and laissez- faire liberalism can work together, outside of basic liberal theory in harmony; (2) does not discuss what happens when a state moves away from liberalism.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the fact that Wilson had envisioned the League of Nations, the United States would ultimately not join due to Wilson’s death and the appointment of an anti-League Of Nations executive. However, the League of Nations was designed to be a system “whose principal mission was to maintain world peace. Its primary goals, as stated in its Covenant, included preventing wars through collective security and disarmament and settling international disputes through negotiation and arbitration.” Collective security was a way to ensure peace among the countries, and that they would all team up if one of the countries were to breach the peace. Disarmament is reducing and limiting a country’s weapons and military forces. This League was designed to promote world peace: the essence of Wilson’s vision. Wilson wanted to make his vision very clear through his Fourteen Points. A document citing 14 different specific morally diplomatic ideals that he wanted implemented into countries worldwide including the United States. Not only was he trying to push for world peace, he also wanted to improve trade and the freedom of trading including the land and seas used by and for merchants. His vision was also somewhat aggressive in the sense that he wanted for all the targeted countries to have their country boundaries drawn and…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By first examining the history of the famous Melian Dialogue, then applying the positive, realist theories of Thucydides and Weber, then contrasting these theories with Kant’s normative, cosmopolitan beliefs, this fundamental issue of international relations - the Melian Dialogue - can be utilized to further examine the possibility of ethical action in the world of nation states, leading to the conclusion that, while ideal, cosmopolitanism does not exist as a realistic option in international affairs due to the win-lose attitude seen in societies. Throughout the Dialogue accounts of realism are consistently illustrated while cosmopolitan beliefs never come to fruition, supporting the claim that realism exists as a genuine way of handling altercations between states while cosmopolitanism demonstrates a utopian model building towards world peace yet unobtainable due to the static nature of the world, held in place by those in power, refusing to relinquish their…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance Fine critiques the idealism of cosmopolitanism, and suggests in ourder for it to be effective we must focus on the frameworks that will promote a practical human rights culture . Calhoun similarly discusses the concern with cosmopolitanism not being effective enough to promote a less fractured world. He suggests it needs a change of focus as right now its focus is primarily on individual rights and is ignoring the role of global capitalism. Though one could argue that in the face of state violence this ideal is imperative to maintain some minimal form of human society or community on a global scale. With this sense of global society there would be a responsibility attached to this power not to remain inactive in the face of state violence. Cosmopolitanism can serve as a universal responsibility, it can impose governance of international affairs through non violent processes of communicative interaction (Fine, 82). Therefor as one can see the critics are correct in that cosmopolitanism has limited effectiveness to promote an equal world, but with a change in focus it may be deemed effective.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism And The Cold War

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The idea that ‘states coexist in a competitive arena’ (Waltz 1995) is proved to be exceedingly accurate when regarding wars throughout history. The Cold War for example shows clearly a fight between states (the US and the USSR) to be the hegemon of the international community after the introduction of nuclear weapons threatened the balance of power. Arguably still this was a fight not just for physical security but for the security of ideals, in the eyes of the U.S if “commy” ideology spread then this would pose a threat not only to national security but to their sovereignty also. The Cold War however is viewed to be controversial between Liberalists and Realists. From a liberal perspective the fact that the Cold War ended through peaceful means without conflict proves that war is not inevitable and that diplomatic means and groups such as the UN can ensure peace. This however is idealistic. The fact that the U.S and USSR where never in direct conflict was because both states realised that any form of nuclear war would not go in either’s favour. National interest and the security of their people was enough to motivate peace; even if it was a fragile peace. However, the fact still remains that if either the US or the USSR believed that they could have become the hegemon without severe losses to national interests there would have been a war, institutions and diplomacy did not prevent conflict. And as rightly argued by Waltz ‘a state cannot be sure that today’s friends will not be tomorrow’s enemy’ (Waltz 2000), there is no way to guarantee lasting peace so states must be sure to protect themselves even if that will result in war. Hence, the need to protect the states sovereignty does inevitably result in war; war is a tool to ensure power and security and as such will always…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill demonstrate two contrasting moral theories. The philosophers have very different ideas about ethics and happiness. Immanuel Kant, author of “Duty and Reason”, believed in the morality of the good will and duty. According to Kant, happiness is an emotion unable to be controlled while motive is controllable; therefore, duty is the most important aspect of leading a moral life. Conversely, John Stuart Mill, who wrote, “The Greatest Happiness Principle”, is well known as a utilitarian, who stress the greatest happiness for the greatest amount. While they may have disagreed about what makes an action ethical, Kant and Mill are both extremely significant philosophers. Further acknowledgement of the contrasting…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Citizens appreciate that the benefits of trade can be enjoyed under conditions of peace. Liberal philosophers, beginning with John Locke in the seventeenth century, saw great potential for human progress in modern civil society and capitalist economy, both of which could flourish in states which guaranteed individual liberty (Jackson and Sorenson, 98). Liberalists believe that states should cooperate for resources. Liberalists believe that individual’s share many interests and can thus engage in collaborative and cooperative social action, domestically as well as internationally, which results in greater benefits for everybody at home and abroad (Jackson and Sorenson, 98). Liberalists believe that an increasing interstate cooperation thus brings the best chances for development and peace. Liberalists believe that institutions uphold and defend justice. Therefore, liberalists join institutions because they believe that the nations and states benefit through cooperation than acting alone. Liberalist theories are presented in American foreign policy as well and are rooted in the democracy of the United States. There is a historical tendency in American foreign policy to be suspicious of secret diplomacy and to be in favor of open relations between the citizens of…

    • 1523 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The League of Nations was borne out of collective desire of the nations around the world to prevent war, promote world peace and stability. Not to mention, the unprecedented destruction and death caused by World War I spurred the victorious nations into establishing a system of collective security in the form of League of Nations. The primary motive of the League of Nations was to prevent/deter or address any aggression by a state through collective response from other states, thereby ensuring collective security. By ensuring collective security, the member states aimed to discourage an aggressor nation from waging war against the victim nation through the prospect of the aggressor having to face the collective power of the members who were signatories to the ‘League of Nations’. Along with other objectives such as disarmament, dispute settlement between countries by conducting…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays