Assess The Causes Of International Conflict Essay

Good Essays
1. Realism argues that interstate conflict is due to self-interest. It also argues that interstate conflict happens simply because it can. Due to its broadness, any war can be an example. Realism argues that Nazi Germany started war because it can. Economic structuralism argues that interstate conflict is due to states’ economic necessities and expansion. The need for raw materials and labor causes war. For example, Japanese expansion into Southeast Asia was due to natural resources. Liberalism argues the same as economic structuralism, except that liberalism believes that conflict can be overcome by free trade. Liberalism also argues that the conflict can be reduce due to the interdependence of the economies around the world. This can be seen though international alliances and treaties. Constructivism argues that interstate conflict is due to nationalism. Norms, identity, and ideas can cause conflict. An example of this is …show more content…
WMD makes the world less safe. The US alone has enough nuclear weapons to blow up the world several times over, yet it does not secure its safely from other countries with nuclear weapons. It might prolong how long it takes till a war begins, but with the damage WMD can cause, it might be worse than having more non-nuclear weapon wars during shorter periods of time. Producing WMD also puts a strain on the environment and people that live around the site. If people do not die in a nuclear war, they can die at home by exposure to nuclear sites. In that sense, nuclear weapons do not necessary make the world a safer place. It only makes the world a different kind of place. Then, there is also the risk of the weapons getting into the wrong hands. Every country wants WMD, but they also do not want everyone else to have them. State’s attempt to feel more safe make the world less safe because all states are trying to acquire weapons; it is the security dilemma. And there is also the possibility of these weapon getting into the hands of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Ever since the nuclear weapons have been invented, the effects of nuclear weapons on the causes of war have been profound. People usually tend to believe that nuclear weapons are bad and should never have been invented in the first place. It makes sense, because people fear the tremendous destructive power of nuclear weapons. However, there are also positive effects of this very devastating power on the causes of war. This is because of the concept of MAD, or Mutually Assured Destruction.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cause Of War Analysis

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Causes of War “On the individual level of analysis, theories about war center on rationality. One theory, consistent with realism, holds that the use of war and other violent means of leverage in international conflicts is normal and reflects rational decisions of national leaders” (Goldstein & Pevenhouse). World War II wreaked havoc on the world due to the devastation caused by Adolf Hitler national leader of Germany whose intent was bent on destroying a race population whom he thought insignificant and inferior. Sparked by Adolf Hitler’s decision to invade Poland World war II began due to Hitler aggressive intent on ignoring the fact that Poland had the support of British and French military support. Hitler as an individual allowed his thoughts…

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    And a current example with North Korea- their leader and government doesn’t reason well and the U.S doesn’t know if or when they may launch a nuclear missile on the U.S. They have threatened the U.S before with missile threats and so it may be easier to declare war on them so the U.S has a chance at winning instead of the chance of getting bombed. On the other hand, declaring war on North Korea would probably cause the death of a lot of innocent people, which is a bad…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hitler led the Germans into war and convinced them that war was the right action (Chapman.N, N.D). Germany’s army grew and the Germans were very convinced with the idea of bringing Germany back to its finest. Hitler could have only done this because fascism was around, which gave him individual power over Germany, so he could do anything he wanted (Russo. D, 2013). The Treaty of Versailles, appeasement, the League of Nations and Hitler’s actions were all causes of World War…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Liberals believe that war and aggression can be lessened and eliminated through collective action. According to Walt, liberalism views the states as central players in international affairs (32). Liberalists believe that the expansion of human freedom is achieved best within democracies and well-cooperated market capitalism. Doyle finds that liberalism leaves a coherent legacy on foreign affairs and argues that the differences among the three theories of liberalism (liberal pacifism, liberal imperialism, and Kant’s internationalism) are not irrational (1152). Doyle examines Schumpeter’s explanation for liberal pacifism, which states that the foundation of pacifism comes from the interaction of capitalism and democracy.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    And even if we never go to war with our weapons, Worldwide transgressions and arguments are solved easier because they know of our power. On the other hand people who believe our nuclear weapons should be dismantled state their view that nuclear weapons only cause problems. They make other nations not like us because nuclear weapons are very hostile and have nothing friendly about them and hurt the morals of our nation and others ( Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons Paragraph 8 ). North Korea feels the need to make more nuclear weapons because of ours. The United States should retain their nuclear arsenal because they help keep our nation safe, If we go to war we can use them to scare off other nations or worst case scenario, use the weapons, and nuclear weapons are more cost efficient than some may…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They believe capitalism was the solution to communism, “Overall, Truman projected American power onto the world stage with unprecedented activity, expanding American interests worldwide, providing American solutions to problems afflicting countries far distant from the United States, establishing the United States as the pre-eminent nation in the postwar era.” The United States, the champion of freedom, had to establish itself as a world power in order to gain creditability and influence. After gaining those two characteristics, they could attack communism. The United States were not trying to expand its empire, but merely trying to stop communism by spreading capitalism. This had to be done because the Soivet Union would have wanted to spread communism and take over the world in some sense. They believed the world would be a better place without capitalism.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I think what he’s getting at is slavery was not seen as an unjust thing, but rather another resource. Beckert explains war capitalism and colonization to be just another way to have economic advantages and markets to trade with. Looking at the entire views of capital and industry during this time period, brings about the kind of thinking for merchants and countries. As industry transformed, it leaked into other institution, economy, political, and eventually to…

    • 1267 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many markets were untouchable due to communist regimes where the push to ‘neo-liberalize’ the world was articulated with the language of binary opposites of ‘freedom’ vs. ‘communism’ and ‘free markets’ vs. ‘controlled markets.’ The end of the Cold War allowed for a triumphant neoliberalism where the hegemonic position of the US in the international system from the 1990s on, opened up new opportunities to develop and increase its economic influence. The effort to open up markets and promoting free trade deals became more…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This fuelled a European arms race, whereby nations invested in new weapons and emerging technology to gain imperial possessions. Historian Robert K Massie believed ‘Wilhelm’s bombastic, thrusting nature, definitely contributed to the arms’. Wilhelm’s desire for power and wealth, overthrew his main concerns and priorities for the nation and this is seen through his support and ultimate outbreak of WW1. Kaiser Wilhelm II played a profound significance on the national and international outcomes that resulted as in the July crisis of 1914. Kaisers ultimate support in the initiation of WW1, was the result of his upbringing, relationship with British monarchy, ousting of Bismarck…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics