Today, I will do my utmost in discussing the following. First, I will discuss the origins of Liberalism and Realism. Secondly I will explain their influence on world politics and human behavior. Finally, I will briefly explain how each theory explains International politics.
Before I delve into their origins, I would love to shed some light on International politics, also known as International Relations. International Relations is an academic discipline, which focuses solely on how actors (Nations) act with one another on the International level.
Liberalism is the belief of possible coexistence of an actor with its counterparts. Liberalism focuses on a rational team approach to solving problems faced by an actor or a group of actors. Liberalism has existed before it was given its officially name. it was used by the likes Locke and Hugh. Liberalism looks to place everyone on an equal footing, showing that both actors can co-exist within a structured system. It helps foster partnerships and alliances between nations and even with people.
This theory is a perspective based on friendship, honesty, love and support. It focuses …show more content…
This ranged form how many horses they had to their manpower. Now that fact still remains, but the advent of nuclear proliferation has partly changed that view. Let’s take into consideration a classic late 2017 scenario between to national leaders. This example will highlight why a not well thought out realism approach to problem solving did not work. I will be focusing on that of the United States President and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s Marshall. The DPRK Marshall Kim Jong Un stated that his nation would be developing WMD’s (Weapons of Mass Destruction) capable of reaching the United States. The presidents reply to the DPRK’S Marshall comment was, “North Korea will be met with fire, fury and frankly power the likes of which the world has never seen
Before I delve into their origins, I would love to shed some light on International politics, also known as International Relations. International Relations is an academic discipline, which focuses solely on how actors (Nations) act with one another on the International level.
Liberalism is the belief of possible coexistence of an actor with its counterparts. Liberalism focuses on a rational team approach to solving problems faced by an actor or a group of actors. Liberalism has existed before it was given its officially name. it was used by the likes Locke and Hugh. Liberalism looks to place everyone on an equal footing, showing that both actors can co-exist within a structured system. It helps foster partnerships and alliances between nations and even with people.
This theory is a perspective based on friendship, honesty, love and support. It focuses …show more content…
This ranged form how many horses they had to their manpower. Now that fact still remains, but the advent of nuclear proliferation has partly changed that view. Let’s take into consideration a classic late 2017 scenario between to national leaders. This example will highlight why a not well thought out realism approach to problem solving did not work. I will be focusing on that of the United States President and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s Marshall. The DPRK Marshall Kim Jong Un stated that his nation would be developing WMD’s (Weapons of Mass Destruction) capable of reaching the United States. The presidents reply to the DPRK’S Marshall comment was, “North Korea will be met with fire, fury and frankly power the likes of which the world has never seen