Liberal Arguments Against Euthanasia

Improved Essays
Euthanasia is the act of putting someone to death painlessly or allowing them to die, as by withholding extreme medical measures, a person or animal suffering an incurable, especially a painful disease or condition. (1) The word euthanasia is greek, meaning pleasant or good death. It is a complex controversy all over the world with two sides: liberal and conservative. The liberal belief is that euthanasia should be allowed because a person has the right to die. They believe that it is immensely wrong to force someone to go through the massive amounts of pain and suffering. Also, liberals argue that if euthanasia is legalized, it will reduce medical costs and doctors will be able to focus on the patients that have a better chance of surviving. …show more content…
Voluntary euthanasia is when a person requests to die. Involuntary is when the person doesn’t get to make a decision and they aren’t asked. Also known as assisted suicide, nonvoluntary is when a person is at vegetative state. Persistent Vegetative State (PVS) is when someone can do simple actions including blinking, breathing, and following an object with eyes but is “brain dead”. There are two types of euthanasia which are active and passive. Active is a quicker death with no struggle of pain. Passive is a more “natural” way of dying where there are no medications to help, instead they sit there until the patient …show more content…
To begin with, a patient with the choice to end their life wouldn’t have to suffer the pain anymore, and they can die with dignity. It would also reduce the pain that the family feels to watch their loved one suffer. Finally, doctors might have a better chance at saving more people if they focus on those who aren’t terminally ill which relates to picking of the best known as “the culling of mankind”. These pros to euthanasia do prove a point that legalizing it would have positives but there are just as many, if not more negatives. For starters, euthanasia violates the hippocratic oath. It gives doctors too much power and as mentioned before, it decreases the value of human life. Legalizing euthanasia may also cause for suicides which is against many religions. These are just a few of the cons of euthanasia. Many people view the issue of abortion to be connected to euthanasia, especially the conservatives. Conservatives toward euthanasia believe it is murder and they believe it is the same with abortion. They understand that although it is not a born baby, it is a different breathing creature that deserves to be brought into the world. Liberals toward abortion believe it is up to the woman to make the decision because it is her

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    One pro to this is that it ends the suffering that the patient is currently enduring. Terminal illnesses are known to cause a steep amount of physical pain as the patient nears death. The amount of pain can cause the patient to acquire fear as the patient knows that death is just around the corner. Euthanasia is able to cut the suffering of the patient short, as well as the pain that the patient’s friends and family feel when watching the patient suffer. It allows all involved to retain dignity.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The cons however consist of violating Hippocratic Oath, decreasing value of human life, conflicting religious beliefs, and giving doctors too much power. Both sides of the assisted suicide argument are pretty strong, but because of religious reasons the physician assisted suicide should not be legalized. According to the book, The Good Doctor, doctors play God all the time. When they prescribe medicines designed to heal patients they are essentially doing what God is supposed to do. The belief, however, is that physician-assisted suicide is right, because God works through these people to perform the procedures that they do.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Active euthanasia is when an individual, that is not the patient, preforms an action in order to terminate that patient’s life (Volker, 2007). Physician-assisted suicide, or PAS, is generally defined as “when a physician provides the means (usually drugs) and advice that enable the person to commit suicide” (Darr, 2000). There are two key differences between PAS and euthanasia. First, with PAS someone, typically a doctor, provides the tools for bringing about death; however, they do not actually administer the means that causes the death of the patient. In euthanasia there is an individual, typically a doctor, who not only provides the tools for death but is also the one who administers the means of death (Volker, 2007).…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People have the right to make "important decisions about their lives for themselves according to their own values or conceptions of a good life, and in being left free to act on these decisions" (Brock 227). This allows people to take responsibility over their own lives as long as the person can make decisions. “For many patients near death, maintaining the quality of one’s life, avoiding great suffering, maintaining one’s dignity, and insuring that others remember us as we wish them to become of paramount importance and outweigh merely extending one’s life” (Brock 227. Life is about quality rather than quantity. Euthanasia is highly subjective; therefore, if it was legalized, then the law should not be very specific about the type of situation that euthanasia is permitted for a patient.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia, also known as doctor assisted suicide, and whether or not if it should be legalized is a very controversial. Euthanasia essentially is permission for doctors to end the lives of terminally ill people to end that pain. It being a very debatable topic some may argue that if there is no positive signs in sight then rather the patient suffer; end it. On the other hand is is arguable that life is valuable so live it through completely, and doctors being given the option of ending live devalues life. Personally, I believe under the right circumstances euthanasia is acceptable, especially if the victim of the suffering is asking to put an end to it as well.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is a serious issue in today’s society. Euthanasia is the act of relieving someone of his or her suffering by intentionally ending his or her life. Many people argue that euthanasia is beneficial to the person suffering as well as his or her family. On the other hand, many people argue that euthanasia is morally wrong. Overall, euthanasia is not beneficial to anyone, and the practice should be stopped for good.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia Case Study

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Research shows that a large sum of medicare money is dedicated to the end of life care. The term euthanasia comes from the Greek for “good death”. According to Vaughn, it is an act of ending a person’s life for their own sake. There are four kinds of euthanasia which include active voluntary or nonvoluntary euthanasia and passive voluntary or nonvoluntary euthanasia.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    where we no longer struggle with the culminating of peoples disabilities because it is abled or simply disposed of before they became a problem. Ladies and gentlemen this kind of society that is waiting for us, if we open and embrace the concept of euthanasia. Euthanasia is the intentional and direct killing of a patient by a physician or another member. It is most commonly done by useful lethal injection and was originally suggested as a compassionate means to end pain and suffering. Supporters of euthanasia argue that we should end lives that are worth no longer of living, so let me ask you a question what makes your life worth of living.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia In Canada Essay

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It’s clear to see that it can cause major damage to the normal social practices we follow today through the decrease in drive to cure illness, the increase in personal autonomy, and the bad laws that may follow. Additionally, it can create a plethora of issues involving regulating the law when it comes to things like “duty to die,” and “duty to kill,” damage to the patient doctor relationship and false safeguarding. And finally, it can cause horrifying psychological pressure on people who have differing opinions on assisted suicide within a household, are forced to counsel patients into euthanasia, or have made a decision that they inevitably come to regret. An English writing once said, “No man is an island” (John Donne, 1624) about euthanasia, which meant that no one man should ever decide their end, be it a doctor or a patient, since we are not island but rather a part of a whole. This point alone should hold enough integrity to dissuade the legalization of…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The word euthanasia derives from greek origins that translates to ‘good death’. The Merriam Webster dictionary defines euthanasia as the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy. The controversy surrounding euthanasia stems from whether an individual with a disability is able to make the choice to put an end to their life. It is difficult to establish whether the individual has a rational state of mind. Philosophical theories of morality and rationality can be applied to an individual’s right to death with dignity.…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is the act of killing a sick or injured person to end their suffering as stated by Merriam Webster Dictionary. The government is against euthanasia because they state that it is inhumane and that only God can take life away, but the reality of the case is that it is a right that the people have and not everybody has the same belief. With the legalization of euthanasia people can end their suffering and the economy can progress in the way that the government doesn’t have to pay for life support and therapies. When thinking if one has the right to take their life away, most people being religious state that only God has the right to take life away and that it is immoral in every way.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Medicine Net, “One of the oldest binding documents in history held sacred by physicians: [is to treat the ill to the best of one’s ability, to preserve a patient’s privacy, to teach the secrets of medicine to the next generation, and so on.” Doctors swore an oath to aid their patients to the best of their abilities, but by legalizing euthanasia it could potentially have them resort to this practice when certain cases become difficult to cure. Some values that are against euthanasia include embracing life itself, respecting higher authority when it comes to religion and death, a doctor’s oath to do no harm, and the power of love from family members. The common value that was found for both sides of the euthanasia issue is life, whether it is their understanding of the quality of life or plainly life…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Benefits Of Euthanasia

    • 1350 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Euthanasia should be legalized as a choice for the patient to be able to make. If euthanasia is even an option for the patient, then they are already at great risk of dying within the next six months or even less and no one wants to have to suffer for that long and still have to know that any day could be their last,…

    • 1350 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia, also known as death with honor or dignity is used to help patients who are suffering from a disease that cannot be cured. When doctors see no hope of cure in a patient’s health, the treatment becomes too painful euthanasia helps, in euthanasia doctors can drug the patient suffering with lethal and put them to sleep.. It is every human’s natural right to decide whether they wish to live or die, especially in the situation where there is no hope for cure. Legalizing Euthanasia can put an end to miserable sufferings of patients in need. It is a way to reduce further treatments that do not guarantee cure and rather cause more pain to the patient.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Thou Shalt Not Kill

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    ‘Thou shalt not kill’ is a moral imperative which is a part of Ten Commandments, which is of fundamental importance to Christians and Jews. This means ‘one should not kill’ or ‘one should not murder’. As humans being creations of God, do not have the right to play God and are not in a position to terminate someone’s life. It’s God’s task to determine when one of his creation’s time has come. Euthanasia means ending ill-person’s life in a painless manner.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays