There are so many things to consider when faced with decision. Most people say that he should steel the cure but also should be punished. Although, should the druggist not also be punished for not allowing people without the means to have the cure free of charge? It is a moral and ethical dilemma indeed. I have went through it many times in my mind and because of social norms and expectations we learn as a society, I feel obligated to punish Heinz, as long and it is a very light punishment. This still ties a person to more than one level of morality. …show more content…
I call this level majority and morality rules. Stage five is majority rules, which means a person will do what the majority for the good of the group votes. Finally, there is stage six. In this stage, a person will do what they feel is morally correct regardless of the outcome or the thoughts or feeling of others.
When I think about these three levels of morality, I find that, when it comes to my professional life, I hover between level two and level three. This is because there are times that I have to be agreeable, times when I have to do what I am told as well as times when I have to follow the majority rule.
For example, I had a position where my boss was not like very much by our area manager. It was a very thin line and I found my self doing things that my area manager told me to do without question, which would be stage three and four. I did not question his methods or authority to gain agreeableness. I also was able at one point to coach up and get the input of my area manger, my self and my boss as well as co-workers to make certain