Thank you Susan for alleviating my concerns. I appreciate your mentorship and suggestions to move things quickly along the curriculum process. As you know, I have come across a lot of barriers providing our students from receiving quality education and workforce relevancy. Hence, the reason I might have advocated with strong conviction in my last email-my sincere apologies.
It now makes sense for the need of other IC department(s) to just give an glance at our proposals. Moving forward, I would suggest that any Psy course or programs be submitted directly to the Chair of the Counseling Department or a member of the Counseling IC. Although Lynn is on the Curriculum Committee, she is not a member of the Counseling IC; hence, the discontent with what IC members have informed me about review. …show more content…
I will also send her, as they are approved by the Counseling IC, any NEW proposed courses. I don't foresee any of these courses conflicting with current Psy. classes. In fact, BHS 155, for example, is the only evidenced based model as of date, and it is proprietary. I am part of the advisory board and we have only approved, besides agencies such as FBI's EAP programs, Florida State University and the MCC/Behavioral Health Sciences program. Any course similar to this proposal would result in a lawsuit. In addition, many of the new courses can only be taught by a certified instructor for student certification process. I've already checked with respective industry mental health organization and only BHS instructors are registered as certified instructors at MCC. Hence, it would be both unethical and concerning if another department is offering similar
It now makes sense for the need of other IC department(s) to just give an glance at our proposals. Moving forward, I would suggest that any Psy course or programs be submitted directly to the Chair of the Counseling Department or a member of the Counseling IC. Although Lynn is on the Curriculum Committee, she is not a member of the Counseling IC; hence, the discontent with what IC members have informed me about review. …show more content…
I will also send her, as they are approved by the Counseling IC, any NEW proposed courses. I don't foresee any of these courses conflicting with current Psy. classes. In fact, BHS 155, for example, is the only evidenced based model as of date, and it is proprietary. I am part of the advisory board and we have only approved, besides agencies such as FBI's EAP programs, Florida State University and the MCC/Behavioral Health Sciences program. Any course similar to this proposal would result in a lawsuit. In addition, many of the new courses can only be taught by a certified instructor for student certification process. I've already checked with respective industry mental health organization and only BHS instructors are registered as certified instructors at MCC. Hence, it would be both unethical and concerning if another department is offering similar