The Pros And Cons Of Lethal Injections

Superior Essays
Lethal injections have been a controversial topic for many centuries. People have many opinions as to if lethal injections are humane or if the act violates the Constitution. The use of lethal injections became a topic of interest around the 1980s. The first lethal injection execution was administered by Dr. Ralph Gray in 1982. The execution went successfully and from there the use of lethal injections became more popular, which started arguments as people expressed their opinions. For example, the correct dosage, protocol, medicalization of execution, ethics of health care professionals, and participations of health care professionals; all raise a red flag as to if lethal injections are constitutional. In my opinion, lethal injections are …show more content…
It prevents more pain than previous methods, it’s safe, and effective. This topic is very opinionate so it has many pros and cons; depending on where you stand if you think some of the issues are positive or negative. There are more negatives than positives but that’s because most people tend to not look at the facts and just rush to what they hear about how “bad” lethal injections are. I reinforced my opinion by researching more about the ideas behind lethal injections and it opened my mind up to the positives of lethal injections. Lethal injections mask as much pain possible, unlike firing squad, gas chambers, and electric chairs. The first drug that is given is the same drug used for a medical induce coma; helps get rid of some of the pain. These prisoners that are on death row deserve to be executed because of the crime committed by the prisoner. The inmates should be grateful that the previous methods are generally not used anymore, because those caused more excruciating pain. When a prisoner is receiving lethal injections, there is a protocol that has to be met. I believe that the protocol is safe and done in the easiest way. Not only are there issues about the protocol but mostly about ethics and the idea of medical professionals participating in the executions. In my opinion, I think medical professionals should not take part in lethal injections because it goes against the doctor’s/nurse’s licenses. Medical professionals are supposed to sustain life, not destroy it by lethal injections. In contrast, I also believe that there are a lot ethical issues that can be involved with lethal injections; it’s a hard action to be a part off and to watch the prisoner slowly die. With all of the negatives and positives of the topic, I still support lethal injections. I believe that lethal injections should be used in all 50 states and declared

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The illusion of death row inmates fitting a cookie cutter description is not true. Inmates on death row come from various socio-economic backgrounds and careers. Not all death row inmates are guilty. In 2004, the state of Texas executed Cameron Todd Willingham for allegedly setting his home on fire, killing his three daughters. However, it was the work of the Innocence Project (Garland, September, 13, 2010) proving the forensic and informant attested in court was invalid and just not true; hence, an innocent man was executed.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This case holds significant value to not only the state of Kentucky but also the other forty-nine states. Lethal injections when properly performed are quick, cost effective, and not as torturous as the electric chair or hanging a person. This process benefits the states in a few ways. These benefits are as follows: less taxes being…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lethal Injections Summary

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The article, “Cruel and Increasingly Unusual; Lethal Injections,” from The Economist, discusses the death sentence in the United States. The article explains that in the US, the most common method of execution is lethal injection, although the practice is becoming rare. In several cases, the contents of the syringe proved to be faulty and the article briefly describes the controversy across the U.S. concerning lethal injections. The article also uses Kelly Gissendaner, a convict who was sentenced to death by the state of Georgia, and examples of failed injections, to show that a multitude of errors can be made in the preparation of an execution. Once the mistakes are brought to the attention of people, “these logistical and moral problems…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Death In Texas Summary

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Also, I would say that the types of execution are not very accurate. About 34 out of 50 states use lethal injection as a primary method. Per Ohio executioners, “McGuire struggled, made guttural noises, gasps for air and choked for about 10 minutes before succumbing to anew two- drug execution method.” Opposers argue that it is consistent, because innocent people that are murdered by capital punishment is rare and all forms of punishment should work…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Either way, today we see lethal injections as the most modern and simple way to do things. There is surely a reason why we stopped having these public gatherings to watch people being executed. Just like the evolution of technology for executions, they started from hangings, firing squads, or the electric chair to now lethal injections, we need to keep the way we administer executions the same. An example would be the Shaw case, according to Bruck, “The electric chair was Shaw’s platform…while Shaw died, the TV crews recorded another “curiosity” of the death penalty the crowd gathered outside the death house to cheer on the executioner… Someone yelled “Where’s the beef” (490).…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    So what really is the role of the physician during lethal injection? Physician participation serves as an illusion that capital punishment can be conducted humanely. Physicians have no social duty to participate in executions. Yes, those who choose to participate do so out of beneficence, but “if physicians…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the process will then repeat. Medical personnel will assess the inmate each round but must first wait five minutes due to the scorching body temperature. The death penalty has been one of the most controversial topics in the entire criminal justice system. From the costs, religion, victim impact, inmate and staff psychological effects, botched executions, deterrence, all the way to those who have no opinion at all, the arguments have fallen into several different categories.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On The 8th Amendment

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Today thirty-two states have this method as the death penalty. The person inserting the injection has to be a doctor. The doctors have to be specialized in order to inject inmates. Medical ethics limit doctors to be a part of the execution. Many do not believe I the taking of another person since they were to take an oath that they would do their best to save…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Parole Vs Parole

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There is no such thing as a humane method to put a person to their death. Every form of execution most likely causes offenders suffering. Some methods, such as the lethal injection, could cause less suffering than to be thinking of being gunned down by guards or to be…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lethal Injections

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Unfortunately, the American Medical Association has strictly declared that it is a violation against medical ethics if doctors participate in any role of state executions, which encourages many medical personnel to ignore inmates under the death penalty as potential…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Texas Death Penalty

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Death Penalty The death penalty has always been a very controversial topic to speak about because everyone has their own personal beliefs. The death penalty is to some as a way to severely punish people who have done awful things, now to others it is a kind of cruel and unusual punishment, something that in this country should not happen according to the United States Constitution. In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court stopped the states from carrying out the death penalty for being racially biased etc. Texas then resumed executions in 1982 and is one of thirty-two states that imposes capital punishment, being by far the most active in killing convicted criminals.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lethal Injection

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the Death Penalty is cost effective and could save the lives of innocents, the Death Penalty actually goes against the First Amendment, in many instances has executed the wrong person, and goes against many religious and moral views; and additionally is becoming a problem in our own state as the penalty is being rushed in order to make sure the necessary drug does not expire. One of the most controversial arguments is the Eighth Amendment vs. Lethal Injection argument. While lethal injection is proposed as a quick, efficient, and painless way to end the life of those convicted, this is not the case. Lethal injections can be faulty, there are many reports of individuals surviving or needing a second attempt.…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is described as a government sanctioned punishment where a person that has committed a crime is put to death by the state. This sentence is commonly used toward people who have committed awfully high offenses such as murder, war crimes, and crimes against humanity and genocides. It dates back to the 1500's where this was seen as the just way of law that made criminals pay for their crimes in front of an entire community. Back then they used methods of hanging, stoning, and lashing these people, their main purpose being one, to maximize the general balance of pain and pleasure towards society. There are certain actions that we can take into our hands and those in which the law plays an important role.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I agree with Zitter when she states that more qualified doctors should evaluate patients in order to determine if they are qualified to end their life with the lethal injection. She emphasises the fact that “we need to take formal protocols, official procedures, outcome measurements, even a certificate of expertise issued by an oversight board” (Zitter). The states that the End of Life Option Act is legal in, do not have proper protocols to deal with this situation and most of the decisions, including the content of the injection is left up to the doctor or hospital policy. I believe that doctors with little to no special training should not be allowed to administer such an important procedure. The extra special training will insure that doctors evaluate patients to the best of their ability, know how to make the best cocktail of drugs that will work flawlessly on each individual patient and do not feel unprepared or unqualified to make such a big…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electric Chair Pros And Cons

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages

    “Officials in California delayed the execution of 46-year-old Michael Morales, sentenced to death for a 1981 murder. His lawyers argued that a lethal injection would constitute cruel and unusual punishment, prohibited under the US constitution” (Hooper). But, that is not true, the Supreme Court along with the people who give and handle the ways the death penalty is given have stated that, yes, sometimes the death penalty and the way it 's done will cause some pain. They also state that the death penalty is not unconstitutional just by the fact of how much pain is given along with the penalty. As stated earlier the Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty is humane and that cruel and unusual punishment is only when excessive torture is given.…

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays