Steroids: In or Out of the Hall of Fame?
Nowadays, usage of steroids in professional sports has become more common and causes more and more controversy. Zev Chafets, in his article, “Let Steroids into the Hall of Fame” goes against the modern baseball regulations and states that the players who use steroids should also be included in the group of most successful athletes in the USA. Chafets uses convincing arguments with solid examples to support his claim. His opinions on the idea that athletes, who show extraordinary skills and use performance-enhancing drugs, should be given a place in the Hall of Fame, are logical and easy to understand. The author uses historical background to backup his idea and uses cause and effect structures in his sentences.
To begin with, baseball is constantly changing. In his article, Chafets mentions: “But since the hall opened its doors, baseball has never stopped changing” (8). This quote says that baseball, as any other sport, is not standing in one place, but is evolving. The rules and regulations of the game have changed a lot since it was created, new points have been added and substitutions have been made. This means that “no-steroid” rule was started long ago, but apparently it cannot go …show more content…
Chafets gives historical proof of this: “Since the dawn of baseball, players have used whatever substances they believed would help them perform better, heal faster, or relax during a long and stressful season” (3). This quote throws light on how popular steroids are and have always been among athletes. Almost every great player has tried those pills to make himself stronger because the stakes in the game are very high. Very often, athlete’s own body effort is not enough to cope with the pace. So, they start looking for outside sources, which brings them to steroids. If all of those players got excluded from the Hall, we would be left with a secondhand
Nowadays, usage of steroids in professional sports has become more common and causes more and more controversy. Zev Chafets, in his article, “Let Steroids into the Hall of Fame” goes against the modern baseball regulations and states that the players who use steroids should also be included in the group of most successful athletes in the USA. Chafets uses convincing arguments with solid examples to support his claim. His opinions on the idea that athletes, who show extraordinary skills and use performance-enhancing drugs, should be given a place in the Hall of Fame, are logical and easy to understand. The author uses historical background to backup his idea and uses cause and effect structures in his sentences.
To begin with, baseball is constantly changing. In his article, Chafets mentions: “But since the hall opened its doors, baseball has never stopped changing” (8). This quote says that baseball, as any other sport, is not standing in one place, but is evolving. The rules and regulations of the game have changed a lot since it was created, new points have been added and substitutions have been made. This means that “no-steroid” rule was started long ago, but apparently it cannot go …show more content…
Chafets gives historical proof of this: “Since the dawn of baseball, players have used whatever substances they believed would help them perform better, heal faster, or relax during a long and stressful season” (3). This quote throws light on how popular steroids are and have always been among athletes. Almost every great player has tried those pills to make himself stronger because the stakes in the game are very high. Very often, athlete’s own body effort is not enough to cope with the pace. So, they start looking for outside sources, which brings them to steroids. If all of those players got excluded from the Hall, we would be left with a secondhand