Leonhardt's Inequality Has Been Going On Forever?

Good Essays
In Leonhardt’s essay “Inequality Has Been Going On Forever…But That Doesn’t Mean It’s Inevitable” Leonhardt explains how the middle class is suffering in a prosperous nation. Leonhardt is the managing editor of The Upshot, a New York Times site, and published an e-book, Here’s the Dead: How Washington Can Solve the Deficit and Spur Growth” (2013) based on economic issues. Leonhardt’s concern is the rapid pace in rising inequality, as the wealthy are affluent in capital gains, taxes, and education. I agree that inequality is a concern because living in a society where everyone isn’t treated the same in terms of wealth causes conflict.
The standard way of thinking about financial gains in terms of rising inequality has it that the wealthy are always one step ahead of the rest of the population. Inequality is regarded as, a norm, and inevitable to society because it has occurred for decades, and hasn’t improved among the middle class. It appears that the rich have always been wealthy, but in recent times everyone affiliated themselves with equivalent levels of capital, therefore inequality levels weren’t as high. During the 1980 and 90s financial crisis, the
…show more content…
Wealthy owners can gather savings, and sustain their progressing patterns of income. To adjust this issue Leonhardt, (545), urges “a global wealth tax aimed more directly at capital inequality than income taxes currently are”, as a solution to inequality, however it will apply to those whose incomes are in the millions. Capital gains is the main source profit derives from it, and Leonhardt assumes that taxing capital is a way for the wealthy to pay their fair share in taxes. Although I agree with Leonhardt on taxing capital, I cannot accept his assumption that by doing so will cause much of a difference on the wealthy because they will find other ways to accumulate money without being

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    1: What is Trickle-down economics Trickle- down economics is the idea that the money that the “Super Rich” spend circulates and promotes growth in the economy and benefits others. It is the theory that the drivers of economic growth are people that are successful in the economy and that from the tax cuts they receive they will spend more of their money in the economy and invest in business’s which will supposedly generate more jobs. Yet if this is in fact true then why is it that the living conditions are still bad and jobs are at an all-time low. It is promoting inequality and creating a bigger divide between the working class citizen and the super-rich. According to research done by (YouTube video) Britain is the only economy that has grown…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Americans always want to pay low taxes, especially the rich who make millions or even billions and complain about how it 's hurting their businesses. However in reality taxes on the rich are among the lowest they have ever been. America has seen a steady tax decline on wealthy Americans since the Reagan administration while wages for the middle class have barely increased after adjusting for inflation. All while the rich claim that decreased taxes on the rich will lead to a better economy but when one looks back, the economy was doing the best when America had high tax rates on the rich and they paid their fair share. As a result, it brought in more revenue and increased government spending on the country 's infrastructure creating more jobs.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The government borrows money for various reasons like programs, projects, bailouts of companies, and more. As the government borrows more money, this increases the national debt. Furthermore, a high national debt is bad for the country and citizens. As the debt rises, the interest rate will rise too. Thus, a con of the national debt is the private sector will have no interest in borrowing money with a higher interest rate, and citizens may have to pay higher taxes to compensate for the high national debt.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the short essay “Inequality has been Going on Forever,“ Leonhardt discusses the negative impact of the separation of the middle and rich class and how it affects the economy. He indicates the amount of massive inequality. Leonhard is able to enlighten the audience by describing the increasing wealth gap, by including our tax system, our education system and how the United States markets and deals with capital. Although many may argue that inequality will always be a problem, Leonhardt is able to shut down the idea by bringing in education as a solution to help the middle class rise up and form a more equal nation. To begin with Leonhart hints that the world has become inadequate by repeating words such as “inequality, inevitable and equal”…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Should The Rich Be Taxed

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With America’s economy struggling, many citizens believe that the rich should be taxed more to help fix the economy. This issue has caused a division between those who believe the rich should be taxed more and those who do not. For example, when voting for presidents, this problem is a major factor of who gets voted into office. The reason that the rich can be taxed without the rest of the country being taxed is, America’s income tax system is set up by using a graduated tax bracket. This means that the more money a person makes, the higher the percentage of money they have to pay.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I couldn’t agree more with his statement, as it seems like everyone is intimidated to raise taxes on the wealthy, or makes up excuses why we cannot do so. According to writer Dana Golden 2009, “the more wealth the rich accumulate, the more they will spend it, thereby stimulating the economy” (qtd. in King 614). Golden’s claim that the more wealth the rich have, the more they will spend it, rests upon the questionable assumption that they…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In our current society in the United States, wealth inequality has grown by leaps and bounds. As time is passing, we are seeing that the rich individuals in our communities are getting richer and the poor individuals are getting poorer. This is to be expected with capitalism at the base stage, but one would think that there would be measures in place to prevent the poor from getting too much poorer. However, in the United States at least, some of the wealthiest members of society are, unfortunately, also lawmakers. Many politicians write laws that only make them wealthier, while putting the financial burden on the lower income individuals and families of the population.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Simply, they both agree on the fact that there is inequality in the world today, the economy is not stable, and the American Dream isn’t what it used to be. King and Krugman recognize that the inequality in America has drastically increased over the decades. King states, “…that wealth is concentrated into the hands of rich minority” (574). This is one of the biggest problems that is causing inequality because there will not be a equal part between the rich and the poor in this economy. Krugman holds a similar position on this issue by agreeing with King on how the rich minority shouldn’t have all control in the economy.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Introduction An article written by Eduardo Porter and published by The New York Times titled, “Tax Cuts, Sold as Fuel for Growth, Widen Gap Between Rich and Poor,” describes both the relationship between tax size and tax revenue, as well as the trade-off relationship between efficiency and equity. Arthur Laffer, the creator of the “Laffer Curve,” introduced the idea that decreasing the size of a tax will eventually lead to an increase in tax revenue (Porter, 2017). This idea is vital to economics today. Also, the idea of efficiency and equity is discussed, which is also a major topic in economics. It is stated that cutting taxes for the rich does not foster any more growth or productivity.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some believe the rich should pay more in taxes in addition to others are complaining about how easy the rich have it. The chances are that the author who makes such a statement is highly likely to be uneducated or simply frustrated. However, some make valid points, and they have reasons for their opinion. A well-known politician, Paul Ryan, wrote about this issue and stated, “We 're all dependent on the government services that we too easily take for granted. The wealthiest Americans receive the greatest benefits, but they insult the rest of us by treating their tax responsibility like a game.” Again, the wealthy people that he is describing are the people who have either inherited the money, or so called “fake suits”, or are people who have made their money by climbing the corporate ladder of large corporations that have deceived average citizens to become so broad.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays