What Is Leibniz's Theory Of Substance Dualism

Superior Essays
Introduction
Gottfried Wilheim Leibniz lived between 1646 and 1716. He was a German philosopher, mathematician and logician. In his contribution to philosophy, he is known for his wide range of thought about fundamental philosophical ideas and principles which includes truth, necessary and contingent truths, possible worlds, the principle of pre-established harmony and the principle of non-contradiction. His principle of pre-established harmony argues that God created the universe in such a way that corresponding mental and physical events occur simultaneously. This paper aims at establishing how Leibniz Law supports Dualists claim that mental state is distinct from the physical state.
Leibniz law states that if A and B are one and the same
…show more content…
Is it within the brain? Or is it within a nonphysical medium? What then would such a nonphysical medium be like? Would it be what is referred to as Soul? Is each person an immaterial soul or spirit operating a physical body?
Substance Dualists
Substance Dualists argue that the mind and the body are composed of different substances and that the mind is a thinking thing that lacks the usual attributes of physical objects such as size, shape, location, solidity, motion and adherence to the laws of physics. These Dualists are divided into various categories depending on how they think mind and the body are related. These categories are as follows;
Interactionists: These type of Dualists believe that the mind and the body casually affect one another.
Occasionalists: They argue that mind and the body do not interact though they may seem to. To illustrate this, they give an example of when on hit his/her thumb with a hammer and a painful and distressing sensation occurs one may see as though the mind and the body interact but they don’t. They defend their argument by saying that the sensation is not caused by the hammer and nerves, but instead by God. They claim that God uses the occasion of environmental happening to create appropriate
…show more content…
As seen in this essay, they argue that the mind and the brain are two distinct entities. Since the mind is not located in physical space according to Dualists, then one is left wondering how then it can cause or affected something that is located in physical space. Again applying Leibniz Law, this would seem to mean that if A causes B, then A must be located somewhere in space and B must be located somewhere in space. For A to affect B, they must be physically next to each other in some way. Therefore, there is no way the mind can be said to be distinct from the body yet they both affect each other. Consider the following

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For this argument, the mind is defined as a non-physical state where consciousness—awareness and thought—take place, and the brain is a physical construction of neurons, which interact to produce thinking and control the body. Mind-Body Dualism responds that there is a mind (nonphysical) separate from the body, meaning the brain (physical), with the mind in charge of mental states and consciousness, evident in love, belief in god, and personality, and the brain in charge of regulating the body, sense perception, physical motion, etc. They are two dual substances.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Though the brain states can be studied and explained through science; mental states are unexplainable and there are not able to be scientifically examined. However, this means that when the brain (body) dies then so does the mind since it is derived through the brain (Mohn, 2017). Within property dualist, there is epiphenomenalism which believes that the physical world influences our mental states but out mental states cannot influence our brain states. Or there is interactionism where one believes that mental states such as our desires provide guidance to our brain states (Mohn,…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will be explaining and evaluating Argument 2, on page 36 of Jaegwon Kim's Philosophy of Mind, which supports Cartesian substance dualism. This argument, which I call the argument of transparency, attempts to support the first major tenant of Cartesian substance dualism: There are substances of two fundamentally different kinds in the world, mental substances and material substances—or minds and bodies. The essential nature of a mind is to think, be conscious, and engage in other mental activities; the essence of a body is to have spatial extensions (a bulk) and be located in space. (Kim 34)…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Leibniz’s law argument states that if x and y are the same, then x and y must all have common properties; although, if one of them lacks some property that the other one has, then x and y are distinct. Furthermore, this means that if there is one or more than one property that the mind has but the body lacks or, one or more properties that the body has but the mind lacks, then both the mind and the body are considered to be distinct from each other (page, 16). I agree with Leibniz’s law argument because, both the mind and body contribute their own techniques and features in different situations. For instance, the physical body has the ability to experience the physical world by the five senses, such as touching, tasting, smelling, seeing, and hearing. As for the mind, it has the ability to reason and understand why the physical body is experiencing such situations and how it may be happening.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Substance dualism is the ontological view that there exists two sorts of substances; mental and physical (material and immaterial). The existence of the substances are fundamentally distinct and exist independently of each other. If the soul can survive the death of the body, then there is the possibility of an after-life. Plato and Descartes are notorious for substance dualism which is also known as mind-body dualism, the believe that the soul is able to live on without the presence of the physical substance, the body. In this essay I will describe and assess the argument of substance dualism postulated by Rene Descartes (1596-1650).…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cartesian Dualism

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages

    They assume that the soul/spirit can be located in a particular place (such as the pineal gland discussed earlier), to which Conway disagrees because “spirit is body and body is spirit.” Secondly, she argues that dualism only leads to mechanism because it has such a hard demarcation between the soul and the body, which entails the body to be some machine or tool that is not integrally associated with the body. Thirdly, Conway says that dualism cannot account for the interaction between mind and body regardless of what Descartes says about the mind-body union because dualists see mechanical motion as the only type of movement possible for material entities. Dualist philosophers seem to think that mind and body are defined by the exclusion of characteristics, as two things that do not have anything in common cannot influence each other. This argument fails to recognize the explicit interaction and communication between the two.…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism vs Materialism The mind/body problem, the question of what is the relationship between the mind and the body, is commonly seen as a key issue in the philosophy of the mind (Sober, 2013, p. 204). The two categories of views discussed in Sober’s ‘Core Questions in Philosophy’ that attempt to resolve the mind/body problem are dualism and materialism. Dualism is the theory that the mind and the brain are two fundamentally different substances (Sober, 2013, p. 204). Conversely, materialism says that matter is the one and only fundamental substance in nature, and the notion that mental phenomena are a result of physical interactions follows (Sober, 2013, p. 204).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I argue that substance dualism is true. Substance dualism claims that people and bodies are distinct. People, such as you and I, are nonphysical beings. We are connected human bodies, but we are not bodies. The reason is that (1) If we can exist without bodies, then we cannot be bodies.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In philosophy, a theory that includes the viewing of the the mind and body as being separate kinds of substances or natures is known as mind- body dualism. This stance implies that the mind and body not only differ in meaning but refer to different kinds of entities. Thus, a person that proposes the concept of dualism would oppose any theory that identifies mind with the brain, conceived as a physical operant. Descartes reaches this conclusion by arguing that the nature of the mind is completely and utterly distinct from that of the body, and therefore it is possible for one to exist without the other. This argument gives rise to the famous problem of mind-body causal interaction that are still commonly debated today: how can the mind cause…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This Dualist idea presents the Mind and Body as separate things made of separate stuff. The Body is external and public whereas the Mind is internal and private. This view pushes that the Mind and Body are still connected, however, explaining that what the Mind wills the Body does. The Doctrine justifies this connection by explaining two separate…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dualism Vs Physicalism

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Such matters are able to be explained through the evidence of empirical research on the brain. Thus, it cancels out how there is an unknown development of interaction between the mind and the body since all development of the mind can be traced by to the how the brain of the body was impacted. Which leads to how physicalism is the stronger answer to the mind-body question given the argument of dualism lives us with more of a hypothetical…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If there is any property that is not shared by both, then we can conclude that the mind and body are two separate things. One sort Leibniz’s law arguments focus on how the mind and the body are known. The mind has the property of being known with certainty; we cannot doubt that our minds exist because having a mind is requisite for doubt. On the other hand, physical bodies are made known through our senses. It is possible that our senses can be deceived, thus, bodies do not have the property of being known with certainty.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The problem of other minds and the mind body problem. Dualism has traditionally struggled to account for how an immaterial substance can interact with a material one. Behaviorism on the other hand is a physicalist theory and implicit in it is the idea that the mind arises out of the material physical world. What dualism fails to account for, Behaviorism solves simply by ascribing to a view of the purely material. The other is the problem of other minds- the objection to Dualism based on the undesired conclusion that if all we can be sure of is our own bodies, we can never know for certain that others even really exist.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In contrast, dualist theorists, such as Plato and Descartes, hold that man is composed of two utterly distinct substances. In dualism, the mind and the body are not only different but they exist separately of each other. They are “as different and distinct as the…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays