Legitimacy, And Mesopotamia

Superior Essays
As I read both readings I was intrigued as they both focused on ancient cities and states and their developments. In the article Order, Legitimacy, and Wealth in Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, by John Baines and Norman Yoffee they compare the differences in civilizations between Egypt and Mesopotamia. Later on I will explain what Baines and Yoffee mean by the terms they used to help us understand how ancient states developed and endured. Bruce G. Trigger explains the many distinctions between city-states and territorial states in his work States: City and Territorial, he also makes some comparisons between them both. Trigger contrast its major features between the city-states and territorial states, I chose a couple of his many examples that …show more content…
Unfortunately, city-states did not have the same opportunity as the territorial sates. The size of the territorial sates made central political control indirect at times, so that way they have have a way to challenge them with control, instead city-states they have a set power of political control. Territorial states maintain their economy by the rent and taxes paid to the government and landlords by farmers. The farmers of territorial sates were really different than the ones in city-states they did not have access to technology, like the ones in city-states. The farmers in territorial states had few reasons to go to urban centers or means to obtain luxury goods, also their urban centers were way smaller than the ones in city-states. There are many more differences between them and I think Trigger did a great job explaining them in the article, and showing us the distinct contrast between the two forms of ancient complex societies. Baines and Yoffe also compare the history of two civilizations which are the Egyptian and Mesopotamian. In the article Order, Legitimacy, and Wealth in Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, Baines and Yoffee address the issues on how a civilianization should be run and how it will continue to run smoothly by using the three steps as they say “Order, Legitimacy, and Wealth”. The way that they explain the terms shows us how important it was for Egypt and Mesopotamia to maintain the order, legitimacy and wealth within their civilization, these steps became the core of a civilization. In other words, I will explain what I think they mean by these

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Throughout Global history, there have been many river valleys which play a big role on early civilization and make the important contribution to the world. Three civilization of these is Mesopotamia, India, and China. Mesopotamia is the land that located between Tigris and Euphrates river. This can be considered as the reason why Mesopotamia called Mesopotamia. In Greek, it technically means between two rivers, and obviously this is exactly what was happening.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Greek polis and the Sumerian city-state were both equally important to the civilization that it belonged to. Although they both were essentially the same thing, both differed in its operation depending on the civilization it belonged to. A Greek polis differs from a Sumerian city-state because a Sumerian city-state had ziggurats, Sumerian city-states relied heavily on agriculture, and Sumerian city-states differed in how they were run. Greek polis gradually advanced during a period known as the Dark Age. However, by the 8th century B.C.E. it became to be known as a distinct and important establishment in Greek society.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mesopotamia Dbq Essay

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, since Egypt was self sufficient in their natural resources, such as papyrus which was used for writing and metals whereas Mesopotamia, lacked natural resources and had to interact with civilizations to trade for goods, Egypt ended up not interacting with civilizations because of this, resulting in…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The rise of the early civilization in different regions is extremely diverse. Although some regions share similarities, they share many differentiations as well. From regions such as small farming settlements to full-blown states, there are many factors that can be compared as well as very different from one another. Specifically, Mesopotamia and Egypt share many components that are similar as well as different. Factors such as the environment, subsistence, trade/exchange, technology and social organization are major aspects that can be analyzed.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1A). The boats in Pic A and Pic B helped the development of the civilization of both Mesopotamia and Egypt, economically, politically, and socially in many ways. In an Economical perspective, the boats were utilized to transport goods faster and reliable to other surrounding cultures. Thus, the price of shipping has fallen because the merchants were able to transport goods faster at a lower cost to them. The low cost of transportation helped the merchants produce more goods than in front.…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The political difference between the universal power of the Egyptian pharaohs and the Mesopotamian emperors served as the most significant factor that influenced the varying degrees of stability of ancient Egyptian and Mesopotamian society brought about by the type of ruler, along with each civilization’s religion, economics, and social structure. Mesopotamian society lacking the presence of the pharaoh led to the beliefs in violent gods who were feared instead of revered as they were in Egypt. However, in Egypt, pharaohs benefitted the people of their society through trade with other empires which resulted in riches. Both societies were patriarchal, but the Mesopotamian emperor held an iron fist over social classes that was not found in ancient Egypt’s fluid social structure. While the numerous differences between Mesopotamia and Egypt are evident, a prominent one emerged when examining the culture’s religions as well as beliefs.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This extremeness could also be due to their government system. While the Egyptian Pharaohs controlled over one land mass single handed, the Mesopotamians had a city-state system, making it difficult for each area to be on the same boat. This system could be what led to the fall and separation of the Mesopotamia region. In short, the Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilizations were very different. Despite their proximity and similar beginnings and influences, each culture provides us with varied insights as to how life was lived during ancient times.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although both Egypt and Mesopotamia developed at the same time, environment and natural forces affected differences in political systems, religion, and social stability. The rise of civilizations in Egypt and Mesopotamia occurred about the same time and both civilizations grew along mighty rivers. There were many similarities but many differences as well. In each case, it was the river valley and geography that dictated outcomes affecting agricultural prosperity, religious formation, and government structures.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mesopotamia Essay

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Arise of Civilizations in Mesopotamia and the Nile River Valley The Fertile Crescent lies from the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean Sea. The Fertile Crescent was a land named because of its good soil and its golden wheat fields. Within the Fertile Crescent was a region called Mesopotamia that the ancient Greeks had named later. This meant “between the rivers” where it was located it was between the Tigris river and the Euphrates river.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Sparta And Athens

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sparta and Athens were both successful City States in Ancient Greece. Although they both were located in the same country, they both had conflicting views on several issues and they were different in the way they operated. The Athenians cared more about learning and the arts, while the Spartans were focused on military training and following orders. The two city states had different governments and social make-ups. Although the challenging city-states of Sparta and Athens were individually different as well as governmentally diverse, they both managed to become dominating powers in Ancient Greece.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When we think of Mesopotamia or Egypt we can automatically assume that these two civilizations were of prominence to today’s society. Mesopotamia and Egypt were two very different civilizations with very different values, beliefs, norms and even Religions. Yet both artistic styles and interests were somewhat similar and composed of common materials and resources used to make certain sculptures and paintings. Both civilizations contributed greatly to our art advancements and made it possible for us to better advance over the years with the use of their techniques and style. Mesopotamia is considered to be one of the first human civilizations.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    About 5,000 years ago in the land between Tigris and Euphrates rivers, city-states started to appear. These early Mesopotamian cities engaged in form of socialism, where farmers contributed their crops to storehouses by which workers, such as metalworkers or builders, were able to excel on their particular expertise. The Mesopotamian hallmarks the beginning of the first complex urban societies.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This differing nature of these two rivers played a role in the civilizations that evolved. Mesopotamians developed a civilization based on cities due to the fact that the Euphrates didn’t offer any advantages to the crops because of its location diagonally across Mesopotamia. Meanwhile, Egyptians lacked urbanization and remained a country of peasant villages because of their reliable river and its benefits to agriculture. Consequently, the geography of these two major rivers influenced the different types of civilizations that evolved and the people’s way of…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilization were two civilizations in South West Asia and North West Africa, beginning in 3,500 - 3,000 B.C.E. Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilizations both had similar religious beliefs, however their environment and culture, interaction and exchange, and city-states were different. Egyptians operated under a centralized government while, the Mesopotamians had self-controlled city-state governments. (Strayer, 82-83) The environment of each civilization was different, which may have been the reason for they developed well defined political and religious beliefs.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Patrick Kumba Religion106-03 10/10/2016 The Mesopotamian religion and religious beliefs were mainly influenced by their culture, which believed in rituals and the gods. People believed in different gods and not just one, since each and every aspect of life had its own god. The gods were to be worshipped and if anyone did anything wrong, then it would mean that the gods would be offended. The Mesopotamians also believed in demons which were created by the gods, and they could either be good or evil.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays