The Sabet director says that legalization may decrease the price of marijuana; however, the legalization of marijuana will definitely increase the use of it among the children. In reality, the Sabet reports that under legalization, “there are 2.7 million arrests a year for alcohol versus 800,000 for marijuana” (Sabet). In 2012, Sabet claims that day by day these consumer rates is keep increasing where they are violating the marijuana growing and laws, he says that there are no promises at all that these rates will be diminished after the legalization of the law in the state, so where he claims that what is the point of legalizing when there is no going to be any improvement seen in the crime rates. In the legal market, where marijuana is taxed, he mentions that the market have very well maintained illegal drug trade which most likely to have every chance to stay in the market since the drug trade has been so beneficial for many the drug dealers in the market. Despite the fact, even if they try to cut down the taxed prices there still will be some marks left over because all of the profits they have earned. Therefore, passing the marijuana legalization laws would also not make much difference to loosen up the corporate hold on other illegal things such as kidnapping, raping, etc. Nonetheless, after all these evidences, he declares that low level marijuana customers should not be confined for their use, and former customers should not be prohibited from getting a job or any other benefits because sometimes these kind of sentences tends
The Sabet director says that legalization may decrease the price of marijuana; however, the legalization of marijuana will definitely increase the use of it among the children. In reality, the Sabet reports that under legalization, “there are 2.7 million arrests a year for alcohol versus 800,000 for marijuana” (Sabet). In 2012, Sabet claims that day by day these consumer rates is keep increasing where they are violating the marijuana growing and laws, he says that there are no promises at all that these rates will be diminished after the legalization of the law in the state, so where he claims that what is the point of legalizing when there is no going to be any improvement seen in the crime rates. In the legal market, where marijuana is taxed, he mentions that the market have very well maintained illegal drug trade which most likely to have every chance to stay in the market since the drug trade has been so beneficial for many the drug dealers in the market. Despite the fact, even if they try to cut down the taxed prices there still will be some marks left over because all of the profits they have earned. Therefore, passing the marijuana legalization laws would also not make much difference to loosen up the corporate hold on other illegal things such as kidnapping, raping, etc. Nonetheless, after all these evidences, he declares that low level marijuana customers should not be confined for their use, and former customers should not be prohibited from getting a job or any other benefits because sometimes these kind of sentences tends