Euthanasia In Canada

Superior Essays
What positive or negative impacts could the regulation of Euthanasia in Canada cause? Euthanasia is the intentional killing of someone in order to relieve ones pain or suffering. The legalization of Euthanasia has been a heavily debated topic in Canada for numerous years with various cases and point of views, leading to the current laws on euthanasia in Canada. It is an important matter that needs to be examined carefully as it relates to the value of people’s lives. The legalization of the practice of euthanasia has many negative affects as it goes against many doctors’ beliefs, degrades the value of human life that Canadian law protects, and will possibly be abused by both doctors and patients. The legalization of euthanasia would however …show more content…
The federal government uses laws and the Criminal Code to protect the value of human life and illegalize euthanasia in Canada. Under section 241 of The Criminal Code, it is a felony to assist with suicide despite the fact that suicide is not an offence. The Criminal Code states, “241. Everyone who: a) Counsels a person to commit suicide, or b) aids or abets a person to commit suicide, whether suicide ensues or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.” An opposing point against this argument would be that euthanasia offers the ultimate release for the terminally ill patients and can even be a form of palliative care. Due to the release euthanasia offers to the terminally ill, the majority of Canadians believe that it should be legalized. More than two-thirds of Canadians support making it legal for doctors to help the terminally ill kill themselves, a new poll suggests as the assisted-suicide issue once again provokes heated debate across the country (Blackwell). Often people might say, “Assisting death integrates compassionate care and respect for the patient 's autonomy and ultimately makes death with dignity a real option” (Kimsma). It is important to remember that palliative care is used to alleviate …show more content…
The legalization of euthanasia can be abused and turn the ethical and socially accepted form of euthanasia into a forced and involuntary form of this practice. Doctors may look at patients, notice how ill they are, and make the decision of life or death for the patient without their consent. It can be argued that section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom that says, “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice,” also implies the right to death. This argument was used in the legal case of Gloria Taylor. In this case, it was claimed that the ban of physician-assisted suicide violated the Charter because if they want to end their suffering, they should be allowed to do so before they lose the capability to live life. Often people say, “Canadians should have the right to medically-assisted dying because we believe individuals should be entitled to a peaceful death - and that no one should have to die alone” (Dying With Dignity). Although many people believe that section 7 of the Charter implies a person’s right to die, the legalization of voluntary euthanasia can lead to the deprivation of a person’s right to life. If the government

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    It is not tolerant of religious diversity. It is religious discrimination that punishes those who so faithfully serve everyone who comes to them, and have done so since before Canada existed but who, in good conscience, cannot perform some procedures, such as helping to kill their patients.” (Cardinal, 2016) In conclusion, we need to have a fair legislation, which will respect the will of patients and doctors. Unfortunately assisted suicide will be a reality in Canadian soil. At the moment there is a legislation being drafted in order to give this right to “personal liberties”. However, what it needs to be done at the moment is as stated above, to draft a clear and fair legislation, where there will not be a violation of doctor’s (any individual who work as a care giver) conscience.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vidal 1 Euthanasia is a controversy that has sparked many heated debates all around the world. Due to its nature of removing human life in an instant with the mere injection or consumption of a drug. Many people believe that human life is a precious thing that should be preserved. And others would disagree that Euthanasia should be used as a means of ending their life. Though in truth, Euthanasia should be legalized, for people have the constitutional right to die, euthanasia can be morally justified, and people should be able to die with dignity.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Voluntary abortion is removal of a fetus or an embryo from the uterus in order to end pregnancy” (DICTIONARY.COM) Section 287 of the Criminal Code criminalizes abortion and treats the severity of the crime equal to murder since section 223 considers infants still within the mother’s womb to be a human being. But subsection 4, of section 287 permits individuals from receiving abortions from hospitals, only in the circumstances that continuation of pregnancy will likely endanger the individual’s life or health. (CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA). It be justified because the purpose of this law allows to end a life in order to prevent harm or to preserve life. Section 34(c) permits use or threat of force if the act committed is reasonable in the circumstances.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Dilemma: Euthanasia According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, the definition of euthanasia is, ‘the act or practice of killing someone who is very sick or injured in order to prevent any more suffering’ (“Euthanasia”). This definition makes the ethical argument seem almost unanimous: suffering is a terrible thing, so we, as human beings, have a responsibility to do everything and anything we can to end someone’s pain. Many advocates of euthanasia rely on two simple but choice-pleasing arguments. That a person’s autonomy, along with compassion for the suffering, take precedence. The opposition claims that it is not that simple, they claim that euthanasia defies the sanctity of life and the physician’s role, and that there is a large…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Legalizing Euthanasia Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma (Balkin 2005). The argument of legalizing Euthanasia is important in order for the act to be given to those in need all over the world. Euthanasia is not considered murder nor suicide and does not affect health care. Euthanasia is also a way of providing control and easing pain and suffering (Justitie 2017). Euthanasia should be legalized in order to end suffering for those who encounter constant pain and terminal illnesses.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Suicide In Canada

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Such a death is commonly known as assisted suicide, where a person takes a toxic dosage of medication prescribed to them by a doctor, or euthanasia, where a doctor directly ends the person’s life. There is currently an intense debate surrounding both assisted suicide and euthanasia in Canada, however, the majority of Canadians agree that legalization is the right way to go, for…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assisted-suicide The debate behind legalization of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) has been an on going worldwide dilemma. PAS is characterized, as a physician who with common intention gives a person the needs required for ending ones own life. In Canada PAS is illegal, under section 241 of the Criminal Code, however, Quebec is the only province where PAS has been legalized. PAS is also legalized in the state of Oregon, and in the Netherlands, where it is referred to as medical aid in dying. In Canada, the pubic support for the decriminalization of PAS is increasing, which is putting pressures on the government to change the laws against PAS.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    O’Neill also argues that making euthanasia legal would replace “love with law”. If it is legalized, euthanasia can no longer be considered mercy killing. It would replace a decision that should be made with the consultation of family and doctors with one that is monitored by the government and death-sanctioning lawyers. Ultimately, a government does not care about the patient’s life, adding them into the equation would diminish the love and compassion a terminally ill patient should feel at the end of their life. Legalizing euthanasia would only cause more pain as it would introduce more unneeded stress to the patient.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We must make provisions within our laws to regulate this issue within our boundaries under our control and supervision. We must not prosecute loved ones for "encouraging or assisting" suicide who enable or assist an ill individual to travel abroad to end their life lawfully. The ability of the wealthy to travel to countries where it is lawful for the terminally ill to end their lives has the impact of treating the haves and have-nots unequally. Another reason why euthanasia should be legal is because it, “justifies giving pain-relief treatment even if it has the effect of shortening lives, provided the primary intention was to relieve the pain, not to kill the patient” (Life Information 1). Therefore, euthanasia was intended to relieve pain from suffering people.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Rachels and Brock” Rachels thesis is active euthanasia is morally permissible under conditions when passive euthanasia is morally permissble and the patient wants active euthanasia. Rachels argue there is not a difference between killing someone or letting one die( Rachels pg 649). Rachels makes reference to patients with terminal illness. Once treatment is no longer allievate pain, the patient and family is requesting help because of the suffering. Rachels introduce another point the Conventional Doctrine makes decisions concerning life or death on irrelevant grounds( Rachels pg.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays