Some of the most significant points that Dennis and Huber Jr make are that the insisted data on cannabis use was extracted among arrestees, which were not medicinal patients of the drug. Dennis and Huber Jr go on to say that with very little data on medical cannabis and using out dated research, it is nearly impossible to determine if legalizing medicinal cannabis increases use in the areas that medical cannabis is inaccessible. In the four states where medicinal cannabis is legal, the study that Dennis and Huber Jr have carried out results in favor of medical cannabis as being a most persuasive use of the drug for arrestee data. However statistics are shown by both authors that the change in use or trend level of the drug have not shown any significant change over the past seven years. In conclusion to the analysis conducted by both authors, it cannot be determined whether or not if future increase of legal laws of medicinal cannabis will further more increase the overall use of the drug in both patients, teens, children, and …show more content…
The article is also valuable because it is the first study to research an entire nation on the consumption or medical cannabis, and how it effects the overall population of the country. The authors Hazekamp and Heerdink point out that when cannabis is used as a medicine, it shows positive results on the patience (including children) that are benefiting from the drug. The authors also point out that similar studies of medicinal cannabis have shown similar results to support their claim about the overall consumption of medical cannabis. Although the survey is an estimate of how patience consume and use medical cannabis, it is the first step into future studies on a geographical scale of production, use, and control of medical