Legal Case Study

Decent Essays
2. That on or about April 2nd, 2013 the Plaintiff was asked by Defendant James Dwight Coombs to Transport Household Appliances and Items, with the Plaintiff’s Truck and Trailer only, a Conditional reasonable agreement was made with Defendant James Dwight Coombs over the phone, the morning of said incident. Defendant Benny Hans Sorensen Communicated with the Plaintiff later in the day asking the Plaintiff to make another trip, to move more said Items. The Plaintiff communicated with the Defendant Benny Hans Sorensen that he could not lift, and was disabled, the Plaintiff would only be there with for the Truck and Trailer to Transport any Household said items. The Plaintiff agreed to only help with Transporting the Household said items and Appliances with his Truck and Trailer, because Plaintiff was lawfully Disabled, Plaintiff verbally making this clear and opened a line of communications to all Defendants that the Plaintiff’s actions in the moving were conditional, that he would only help Transporting said items, with the Plaintiff’s Truck and Trailer and Communicated with reasonable care and instructions that the Plaintiff was not to lift any Household items. …show more content…
The negligent act of Defendants towards Plaintiff’s Injuries violates the American Disabilities act, into lifting the heaviest Appliance at one of the said Defendant’s Home, being seriously injured and adding to the Plaintiff existing Disability. The Defendant’s Conduct and the environment fell below the standard of reasonable safety and care in the circumstances, when the Plaintiff was not supposed to lift

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Mr. Owens filed a suit for damages resulting from Tunisons refusal to sell. Issue: Was Mr. Tunisons reply to Mr. Owens offer an intent to sell? Holding: No, the defendant…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judge Casas’ Ruling In APUSA Inc. v The State of California the court rules in favor of APUSA,Inc. The court finds the State of California violated the establishment clause using the Lemon Test and Agostoni test. In both instances the CCQEA explicitly violates the establishment clause by way of money being directly distributed from the government to the religious institutions, joined with a lack of specificity of how the money is to be used. The State of California would be served in adding guidelines to the law clearly dictating that grant money is not to be used for secular purpose.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study 1 AIT 652 Sache Bond Executive summary: Towson University is responsible for complying with both Federal and Maryland state laws. It is essential that all employees are aware that the proper procedures must be followed to ensure that the legal action remains unrevised once the legal hold notice is issued. The legal holds notice will inform all necessary employees of their new profound obligation as an employee. The notice refers you to the policy written on the legal hold notices. The guidance of the legal holds notice supersedes all other retention policy guidelines (Records).…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Issue: Whether the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, and can prove the plaintiff was trespassing by entering onto the defendant’s property without permission and subsequently injuring themselves by operating the defendant’s tractor. Rule: Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout, 84 U.S. 657 (1873) Analysis:…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Harrell & Nowak, LLC is a law firm that is located in New Orleans, Louisiana. This law firm is comprised of trial lawyers and personal injury lawyers. Harrell & Nowak, LLC handles cases that involve serious car accident injuries, truck accidents, medical errors, medical malpractice, slips and falls, toxic exposures, and any personal injury that is caused by the fault of someone else. In 2014, they have been conferred with a Litigators Award.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Causing or allowing to exist a dangerous condition on the grounds; c. Failing to warn of a dangerous condition for which Congden and Maple knew or should have known existed on the grounds; d. Failing to use the care and caution that a reasonably prudent person would in the circumstances then and there existing. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendants’ acts and/or omissions, the Plaintiff has suffered injuries and damages as set forth above, all of which are in direct violation of the common law and Statutes of the State of South Carolina. 15. Ameche is therefore informed and believes that he is entitled to judgment against Congden and Maple for actual and general damages as well as punitive damages. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, Carl Ameche, prays for judgment against the Defendants, Margie Congden, Leroy Congden, and Maple Meadows Campground, for actual, consequential, special, and punitive damages in an amount to be determined by a jury, and for such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wrongful Conviction On the morning of August 10, 1984, Deborah Sykes was brutally stabbed, sexually assaulted, and eventually killed in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. The man convicted for her murder was Darryl Hunt, a 19 year old boy that would go on to spend 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. Hunt was convicted based on eye-witness testimony and informants, but was later exonerated based on DNA evidence that matched a man that was caught just a few months after the murder took place. This case is an exemplar of the strength of DNA evidence and the fragility of eyewitness testimony.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Savitri Bhama

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Plaintiff, Savitri, filed a complaint that Rajendra negligently and intentionally inflicted emotional distress. She alleged that he used his psychiatric training in order to manipulate and brainwash the children into hating her. The defendant then made a motion for summary disposition, which the court granted. The court found the claim to be barred by res judicata. The plaintiff then claimed that by the court granting a summary of disposition was wrong, because her claim was based on relief and was not adjudicated by a court.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eu Law Case Study

    • 1528 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Q4: 1.0: Introduction The issue on whether the principle of supremacy (hereinafter called ‘POS’) of European Union (EU) law where EU law takes precedence over national law still stands firmly, or it is merely a hallucination in the eyes of national courts will be tackled by looking at the Member States’ (MS) responses to European Court of Justice (ECJ) decisions and the methods of ‘qualification’ to EU law’s supremacy that MS adopted alongside with the academics opinions. 2.0: EU law is supreme It is essential for the EU legal system (being one of the biggest legal orders in the world ) to be supreme in order to ensure the uniform application and effectiveness of Community law within the MS. Though the principle of supremacy is not explicitly…

    • 1528 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Effective Law Case Study

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think it’s a great law to inform public about sex offenders whose is leaving next to your door or in the same area. California's Megan's Law informs the public with clear information on the location of sex offenders so that members of the local communities may protect themselves and their children. 2 ) Might it be effective? Why or why not?…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The one thing that all these offenses have in common is that in each instance, corporations tend to benefit from the wrongdoings and if one should happen to get caught, the penalties are so miniscule that corporations still benefit from the misconduct (Payne, 2013). With that being said, antitrust offenses are the least serious offense. Penalties for antitrust offenses can include imprisonment for up to ten years and fines of up to one million dollars for individuals and 1 billion dollars for companies (15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, 3). Offenses two through three are next. These offenses can cause injuries and harm to individuals.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Serious Case Study Essay

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Serious Case Review into the murder of Steven Hoskin revealed weaknesses across each of the agencies in contact with him and those responsible for his abuse and murder. Background At the heart of the Serious Case Review were twin uncomfortable and haunting realities. First, Mr Hoskin was regarded by several agencies not as a vulnerable adult to be protected from abuse and neglect but as a perpetrator of antisocial behaviour and worse. Mr Hoskin had been charged and convicted of assault.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since an offer can only be revoked before an acceptance, Jack was only able to enter into contract with another party if Blair and Chuck had not already accepted the contract. However, as the letter was posted on the 21st, according to postal acceptance rule, acceptance will be complete when letter is posted, even if acceptance is lost in the post and offeror never receives it, there is a contract on the date of posting. This was developed on the basis that an offeror who is prepared to accept a mailed acceptance should take the risk of loss or delay in the mail.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Commercial Law Case Study

    • 2069 Words
    • 9 Pages

    COMMERCIAL LAW Student number: 1400547; Word count:2,173 words The Sale of Goods Act 1979 is a consolidation of the 1893 act and subsequent legislation which places numerous legal obligations on business sellers apart from the agreed express contractual terms. These terms, although not expressly provided for in the contract are fictionally ‘incorporated’ into the contract for consumer protection and also because the contract does not make any commercial sense without them, they are referred to as implied terms. The statutory implied terms that concern sale of goods are embedded in section 13-15 of the 1979 act and in practice do not affect each other like in Arcos Ltd v E A Ronaasen & Son where the goods were of satisfactory quality and fit…

    • 2069 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Filipino Law Case Study

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discussion Point: I would like the class to discuss how the ambiguity in laws were used to control the legal rights of Filipinos and Filipino identification through court rulings that were dependent on a judge’s subjective interpretation of the laws. Supporting Paragraph: This is an important topic to talk about because judges are responsible for interpreting the law and applying the laws equally to everyone. Laws like Naturalization have ambiguity in them so that judges can exercise discretion based on the case. But in the case of Filipinos, the ambiguous wording of the laws gave state judges an unprecedented amount of power over the Filipino population. The ambiguity of the laws gave judges the authority to use selective readings of the law…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays