Legal Argument Against Hate Speech In Canada

Great Essays
Hate speech is essential, as it can have significant consequences for individuals and society. In Canada, specific laws have been established to protect people from hate speech. These laws are in place to promote a safe and inclusive environment for all, regardless of race, religion, sexual orientation, or other characteristics. The debate proposition is that Canada should continue to prohibit public hate speech via the Criminal Code and human rights laws to protect select identity communities from harm. This debate paper will explore the different types of hate speech offences, their consequences, and the available defences. Additionally, it will look at the lived perspectives of the Indigenous and Chinese communities. Finally, it will present …show more content…
These laws were placed because the Canadian government wanted to stop genocide and hatred toward particular groups (Walker, 2018, p. 7). This law created the Criminal Code of Canada, sections 318 to 320.1 (Walker, 2018, p. 8). A court case was conducted to see if hate should be an aggravating factor during sentencing (Hate as an Aggravating Factor at Sentencing: A Review of the Case Law from 2007–2020). They found that the times the judges considered the use of hate crime as an aggravating factor was in severe cases, notably where there was assault involved (Hate as an Aggravating Factor at Sentencing: A Review of the Case Law from 2007–2020).

Moreover, as of 2018, the number of police-reported hate crimes had increased yearly (Government of Canada, Statistics Canada, 2023). This number has doubled from 2018 to 2022 (Government of Canada, Statistics Canada, 2023). The minority community now needs to fear the police when, in fact, they are supposed to be there to keep them safe. Canada has also passed a Sentencing Reform Bill that could help increase the penalties for hate-motivated crimes (Executive Summary,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hate Speech Bans

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Need to Protect Hateful and Offensive Speech In today’s society, information travels almost as fast as light, thanks to the invention and development of internet technologies, however, this enables the dissemination of bad ideas, and hateful and offensive rhetoric across country lines faster than ever before. This ability to share ideas and find others with beliefs like yours has been blamed for the rise of the Islamic State, deepening political divides, and an overwhelming feeling of a growing…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Legalized hate speech? Hate speech has been a problem in America with incidents such as the Charlottesville of the summer of 2017, Hate speech is the form of speech attacking a person or group based on their attributes such as ethnic background, sexual orientation, race, and etc. however, hate speech with without the intent to cause violence should be protected because if America were to try and censor another viewpoint and stop these people from expressing their opinions the past would have…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Stuart Mill’s model of free speech to a situation brought to the forefront in an episode of TVO’s The Agenda, titled What is Wrong with Mark Steyn? The episode explores the issue of Maclean’s magazine refusing to publish a response to a series of articles by Steyn that were being viewed as hateful, as well as potentially harmful, to Muslim people in Canada. It will be argued that Mill would advocate for Maclean’s to publish a response to Steyn’s hateful speech because, if not challenged and clarified…

    • 2080 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays