Legal Aid, Sentencing And Punishment Essay

921 Words 4 Pages
Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) introduced under the coalition government, reformed the basis of legal aid. LASPO reforms to legal aid aimed to regulate the the distribution of legal aid in the UK; which denounced legal aid liability for private family disputes, immigration, housing, debt and social welfare cuts. According to the final equality Impact Assessment in the Bill of Moj*** the implementation of LASPO intends to eliminate the the excess distribution of legal resources at public and tax payers expense. Nevertheless, Legal aid cuts have resulted in inequalities within the justice system, which have ultimately failed the most vulnerable in society due to lack of legal resources to advice and support.

The access and right to a fair trial is regarded as a fundamental human right, maintained by the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR), as well as common law*. It is sustained that it is mandate that the litigant has a right to fair trial, with access to the present their case before the court. Therefore, to reject an individual’s right to legal aid is essentially a breach of this. Legal aid cuts effects were not only costly, but also established a limit of those of which who were now entitled to the support of legal aid. Legal aid cuts have had an impact on the unlawful discrimination of marginalized groups within the legal system, as a result of this. For instance, the residence test which had penalised minorities, proposing that…

Related Documents