We Need To Defend Speech We Hate Analysis

Improved Essays
Formal Essay #1 : We Need to Defend Speech We Hate In the article ‘We Need to Defend Speech We Hate “by Lee Rowland. In today's society we are often faced with hateful speech. On everyday news and media they point out situations on police brutality and violent riots going because of innocent protest that others found offencive . Children of younger generations have no real understanding of what going on today . If our younger generation is taught how to appropriately taught how to exercise their freedom of speech properly the they can be more prepared for what's ahead. I agree with Lee Rowland points in her article, For starters , she explains her statement based off of an A.C.L.U speech on how we should start educating our younger youth of the futures about hateful speech and what may come along with it. This is true because if we don’t teach our children from now they may get the wrong impression off of media and get the wrong ideas about freedom of speech is . Due to what goes on in the media some children today …show more content…
Within a general public , Rowland explain how their are two sides of the firs t amendment . The good and the bad. If not well explained today's Youth will “enter with force”. Meaning that they will walk into the real world thinking anything said or done is ok accounting on their freedom of speech. And how all speech should be equal no matter how good or bad. So any person can go out and say what they like but they won't get punished by the law cause of what they said because it's their freedom of speech . The only consequence that person going to get is criticism and hate . Rowland points out that if students get an successful college education where they can well better explain freedom of speech . They could change bad opinions into good ones. Also it will help students get ready to face all the different types of “isms “ . Racism , sexism , ableism and other ruthless

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Navneet Kaur English 120 Wendy Hayden November 1, 2017 Erwin Chemerinsky’s article “Hate speech is protected from free, even on college campuses” is a response to professor Robert’s C. Post on why all sorts of opinions should be expressed on college campuses, regardless of their offense and unpopularity. As students are disrespected by the thoughts of most conservative speakers, colleges have to shell out thousands of dollars for student safety and to allow speakers to deliver their ideas without any trouble. Chemerinsky, who taught law at UC Irvine, experienced this attitude when his students believed that school officials had the right to limit hate speech. As opposed to Post, Chemerinsky believes that hate speech should be addressed if…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First draft: Rosenblatt Summary and Response In “We Are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid, and Dead” Roger Rosenblatt discusses the views of freedom of speech. He uses examples to show different people’s views on freedom of speech. He also adds his own opinion throughout the article. I may or may not agree on some of the views.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Middlebury Case Summary

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I chose this article because it shows how arrogant the students can be based on the survey. The student’s feelings against “hate speech” gets in the way, which leads them to make poor decisions. Why should hard core situations be prevented from being discussed on college campuses? The first amendment is at issue because the students believes that the first amendment will protect them under every circumstance. The code of conduct is placed in every education environment because it shows that some rights may be limited.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Hell You Say Sanneh

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Hell You Say: Critical Analysis In this article originally published in the New Yorker, Kelefa Sanneh is giving us a very objective view of free speech and the two sides to it. He points out that on one side the liberals are arguing that there should be some kind of limit put on it so that people don’t get offended. On the other hand conservatives are arguing that free speech is one of our most fundamental rights and there should be no restrictions placed on it. He illustrates the arguments made by the two sides but fails to make an argument of his own and write a coherent essay.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The wrongful prosecution of “a white student guilty of racial harassment for reading a book titled Notre Dame vs. the Klan” (LG 5) should raise an alarm that we punish those who education themselves to recognize and prevent the reoccurrence of heinous historical acts. Society has initiated a movement that “sought to restrict speech (specifically hate speech aimed at marginalized groups), but it also challenged the literary, philosophical, and historical canon, seeking to widen it by including more-diverse perspectives” (LG 2). Limiting speech of any form is a violation of freedom of speech. Speech should be moderated to respect individual values, not to avoid uncomfortable topics. The purpose in higher education is to enlighten students and provide knowledge that creates understanding and tolerance of…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering The Victim’s Story” Mari J. Matsuda addresses the topic of hate speech, and the legal rights surrounding it. She argues for the implementation of legal restrictions on hate speech. She makes the theoretical arguments that hate speech can be a causative factor for legitimate harm to individuals; she justifies the need for restrictions on hate speech by citing the various harm that can be conducted by individual that possess such speech. She claims hate speech can cause: psychological effects, internalization which in turn leads to low self-esteem, violence and discrimination, alteration in the mind of others and a feeling of not being protected by a governing body or exclusion from a community.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Hate Cries Prevention Act (HPCA) defines hate violence as a violent act committed to a person due his or her gender, race, color, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, and disability. (Iyer, 22) In We Too Sing America, Deepa Iyer states that the multiple “root causes that lead to hate violence” listed earlier are the “racist and xenophobic attitudes and beliefs we hold about one another”. (Iyer, 23) Iyer goes on to affirm that these root causes for hate violence is only reinforced or even exacerbated “by governmental policies, political rhetoric, and media narratives.”…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom of speech is both right and privilege that we can neither take it for granted nor back away. It’s important to find a middle ground where we can hear one another, where we can debate and disagree with respect. People in America have learn that is good to have an opinion and that you opinion…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Campus Carry Analysis

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The campus carry law refers to policies that allow appropriately licensed students and faculty to carry a handgun on campus as long as the gun is hidden from sight. Several states, including Texas, have passed a bill allowing campus carry; as a result, polarizing debates have ensued over the effectiveness of the law, or more specifically, whether campus carry is truly effective in decreasing gun violence on campus. In the article “How Guns Could Censor College Classrooms” the author, Firmin DeBrabander, argues against the law allowing the concealed carry of firearms in college campuses. DeBrabander believes that “[c]ampus carry will make students and faculty less inclined to engage in the critical intellectual work that must take place in the…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Because the text was published just a few months ago, the discussion over hate speech continues to be talked about recently. In this editorial, Napolitano's central claim is that the First Amendment is, and will always, protect…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is important to focus on all three of these factors in order to determine whether free speech is a good thing rather than make judgements about speech only based off the consequences. Citizens have the right to speak freely about anything especially the things that are not common belief. However, anyone who is around the speech has a right to disagree and comment back. Nevertheless, this does not mean that all speech is appropriate or pleasing to all receivers. Many…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hate Speech Codes

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Freedom of speech, a basic right and amendment that most students who grow up in the United States come to learn and take pride in having from a young age. Many of us take this right for granted at times, what we do not realize is that there are so many places around the world that are continuously fighting for this innate right. Although we lack the fortitude at times, it is a vital right to all of us in our identities and abilities to grow as people and become who we are and allow ourselves to excel. The idea of speech codes, which can be commonly defined as: “politically correct" codes but are more commonly known as hate speech codes.” The issue of whether or not speech codes on campuses are justified is an immoral issue, which should in…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They Say I Say Analysis

    • 2196 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the book, “They Say, I Say” chapter fourteen discusses the necessity for tertiary education. The fundamental focus of chapter fourteen is to determine whether or not higher education offers the bang for your buck. The chapter initiates disputes beginning with the article, “Are Colleges Worth The Price of Admission?” by Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus. This article conveys a controversial issue of the rising cost of admissions and the descending quality of college education.…

    • 2196 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay, Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus (69 - 71), Derek Bok examines just how disruptive a confederate flag can be in a college campus as it has symbolic connections to slavery. Bok 's thesis is that such form of an expression can be offensive, however, this is not enough to prohibit such form of communication due to its First Amendment rights. Bok makes an adequate argument because he assesses the offensive nature of this act as well as the harm that is derived from censorship by mainly providing persuasive notions. Although Derek Bok makes a strong case behind his support of the First Amendment rights, the essay nevertheless conveys various weaknesses.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many countries, hate speech has had laws set against it because they believe that it leads to violence, but in the United States it is considered a form of free speech so it is allowed with no limits. As part of the Constitution, freedom of speech is sometimes used so that people are allowed to express their opinions and say as they pleased. Many Americans want to ban hate speech from being a part of the First Amendment because they believe that it causes and provokes violence against others. Others want to defend their rights as citizens and be allowed to express their opinions with each other without being afraid that they might get fined or put in jail because someone didn’t like what they said and got offended. Hate speech should be…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays