Leadership Is Described As Non-Coercive Influence Case Study

Improved Essays
1. In this chapter leadership is described as non-coercive influence. For what reasons might followers be motivated to respond to a leadership initiative? Followers would me more motivated to response to a leadership initiative, if the leaders worked with the followers to achieve common goals. The main reason why coercive influence is a non-factor for leaders, is it uses threats and punishments to entice followers to work towards a goal, but does not include the leaders working with the followers to achieve the goals as a team. Another reason why followers might respond to leadership initiative in a reward base, that includes them working together to achieve this goal, and in due of achieving it a team reward is given. Such as a team outing …show more content…
Burns’s view is that power resides in the relationship between leaders and followers and is used by both parties to promote their collective goals. Do followers have other power bases besides referent and expert power?
Followers have the same power bases as leaders. Everyone has power is some form or anything, it simply the question of will they use it. For instance, leaders have the ability to possess important information about the company, while in some cases this is confidential and followers may not be able view this information, in some cases the follower are able to or know something internal that the leaders don’t. Giving them equal or greater power base. Other potential powers for followers, connection or relationships, coercive.

3. Choose one of the main traits associated with leaders. How can it be developed? Demonstrated to others? Identify one or two people who have this trait. How does it serve them in their leadership
…show more content…
This fits into the process of nature of leadership, by the followers acting and doing what they see the leaders do. If the leader is seen taking a short cut at work, the followers will see and think that is okay to do as well. They act on what they see the leaders do. In regards to influential nature of leadership is similar but on a larger scale. Anything a leader says, does, from body language, to work ethic to personality, followers will and can pick up on those. We are leaders always tell our followers when training to watch me, then try and practice when starting a new job/training. Now if they see you going someone you shouldn’t be, they are going to interpret that as being

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    360° Leadership

    • 1587 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mid-level leaders have the opportunity to serve their superiors who carry the responsibility of the organization. Once a leader does their job well, they can begin to take some of the responsibilities of top the leaders. These individuals not only come to their leaders with an issue but also with a solution by preparing themselves when they are about to take the precious time of someone above them in the chain of command. Aspiring leaders in the middle of an organization willingly accept tasks and assignments that others won 't. They are the ones that constantly step up and complete more than expected.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This motivates the team to work harder because if a certain goal is achieved it reflects all of them. The different group members also bring different identities and experience therefore will specialize on different fields for the benefit of the organization. The work is discussed amongst the group members and if there is a contradiction among members about certain decision they can vote and majority will rule. If one leader of the organization is absent from work the organization will not fall apart because it is run by a lot of people who know how to carry out everyday tasks. Network influences relationship, but because nowadays people want to work with people they can trust, this can only be achieved through informal relations.…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clendenin is faced with two options, one of which really has the potential to help him develop himself as a leader. One of Clendenin’s apparent weaknesses is the lack of variation he demonstrates in his leadership styles. According to Goleman’s Leadership That Gets Results, leaders can do one of two things to help expand their repertoire: build a team where they lack or develop their skills. Obviously, the latter is more beneficial to leader as they can bring those skills with them. However, Goleman also points out that development of these styles is reliant on having strong emotional intelligence.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A leader is not necessarily the right example to follow, however, he/she can use the influence achieved to convert a predictive vision of the future in clear conditions for the followers letting them understand and interpret the future into the present time action plans. All of us are leaders and followers! There are several types of leaders, (I will talk about this in a little while) for sure all of them should have the following features in order to be successful: • Planning – A leader is also a manager, so, planning and managing is the key. • Communication – this is a mandatory skill for a leader, followers need to understand where we are bringing them and why. • Decision making – People can be managed also behind the desk, however, the objective is still the same “achieving the goals” • Delegating – A good leader knows the staff who is leading which means being able to assign responsibility to the right people and get things…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the things we try to get to know about the interviewees is their leadership style and if they are go getter when it comes to leadership opportunities or if they usually wait till they are assigned a leadership role to lead. Asking these questions to others led me to reminisce about how I would answer the questions if I was being interviewed. My leadership style would be supportive, direct, and open minded. I am a leader who will get the job done but I like to work with a team to get their ideas and input so that we all can contribute. I try to be as direct as possible so that there is limited miscommunication amongst the group.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A good leader is always there to lead their workers and help there if it is needed. If a leader wants his team to work productive he or she should be reachable when they need the leader`s help. They are sure about their knowledge and confident with talking about it with others The great communicators know what they are talking about. They are well prepared, and ready to talk about it. If they do not have enough knowledge about a topic, they would not talk about it before they search and learn it to prevent wrong information.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One example of how this claim does not support psychological egoism is through the case of strictly conscientious action. When someone desires something due to temptation and resists taking action, it is no longer desire that motivated this action; rather, it is their sense of duty that made them resist (Shafer-Landau, 2015). This means that the action no longer becomes part of self-interest because it does not benefit them. Another example of how opponents of psychological egoism will respond to this false claim would be through the motives of selfless people. It could be that our desire is to help people in need.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They are different because transformational leadership is about motivating and inspiring, there is no punishment involved (Bass and Riggio, 2008). Transactional leaders believe in rewards but they also believe that punishment and bureaucratic tactics should be used when their direction is not followed (Day & Antonakis, 2012). In situational leadership, the people and the situation are the defining factors of the leader’s decision and impact. This type of leader tells, participates, delegates, and sells his/her vision to their followers. The leader does not focus on how the followers feel; instead they will adjust their leadership according to the followers’ willingness to carry out the work (Hersey & Blanchard,…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This type encourages followers to grow to be the leader. This leadership does not include any control over others in an organisation, but only defines the purpose and goals or an organisation and helps everyone in the organisation. This leadership is basically a formality, where the leader focuses more on the fact that the work is done, without giving the specific work or tasks to followers. Stewardship, in comparison to participative management, may even more negatively be effected by strong leadership in a stewardship environment, however there could be also advantages of changing the environment by adding and empowering the leader more. A stronger leadership in such environment at least in some situations, where each follower make their own decision that might have not enough job maturity and could drag the organisations development down, might benefit the organisation.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Whenever they tell everyone else tasks that needed to be finished, it would be in a way of demonstrating them first how it can be done before telling them to continue where he left off. How can you be a leader if you don’t take the lead? This is why leaders have followers. A successful project manager would push the team positively. The team, instead of feeling obliged to do something, would even be happy to do at the project manager’s bidding.…

    • 1864 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics