Leadership In Machiavelli's La Mandragola

Improved Essays
Imagine a leader who will do anything imaginable to keep power over their subjects no matter how evil it might be? A few leaders probably came to mind, while it may seem like these leaders are ruthless to Niccolo Machiavelli these leaders are the perfect candidates for ruler ship. Machiavelli lies all the qualities he believes and effective leader should possess in his book The Prince. However, The Prince is not Machiavelli’s only piece of literature that describes the effective prince, this concept also comes up in his play La Mandragola which follows the story of Callimaco trying to conquer a beautiful married woman, Lucrezia. Controversy arises amongst readers over which character in the play is meant the be the true prince of the story. While there are many different theories the two biggest ones are that Callimaco is the true prince of the play, or that Lucrezia is the effective prince Machiavelli speaks of. Although it can …show more content…
When addressing whether it is better to be feared or loved Machiavelli says, “And men have less hesitation to offend someone who makes himself loved than feared.” (Machiavelli 1998, 66) Machiavelli says that in order to keep the people under the control of the prince, he needs to make them fear him so that way they are too afraid to speak out against him. This applies to Mandragola because it is made known that Lucrezia’s servants are terrifies of her because she is bossy and wants things done her way (Machiavelli 1981). This means that Lucrezia makes herself feared by her servants so they will listen to her and do things how she wants them to first time. Although it can be said that this is a minor detail and it is not fit to prove that Lucrezia is the true prince, it is a small illustration to prove that Lucrezia is fit for ruler ship. She is not afraid to make herself feared to get what she wants which is what Machiavelli urges princes to

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli wrote "The Qualities of the Prince" in July 1513 in Florence, Italy, to convey his idea of the strong, active, and perfect ruler to the current ruling the Medicis. The work is remembered and responsible for bringing “Machiavellian” into wide usage as a pejorative term. The essay takes a stringent position on the proper way to govern a nation. With a straightforward logic, a relevant idea, and an expressed method, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of the Prince” is a practical guide for current…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince is a guide on how a proper prince should rule his nation. Machiavelli demonstrates how the past rulers have either been successful or not. Even as his audience were that of monarchs, many of his teachings’ outcomes can be seen in present day. In chapter 12, Machiavelli comments on the usage of mercenary troops.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli’s intentions are clear from the very beginning, the dedication of the book to Lorenzo de’ Medici, the ruler of Florence. The Prince is not particularly hypothetical or abstract, its prose is transparent and its logic incomplex. These attributes underline Machiavelli’s desire to provide coherent, efficient understandable advice. In his book, “The Prince,” Machiavelli stated that a good ruler should not only mirror previous great rulers and seek advice when needed “the prince must read histories and in them study the deeds of great men; he must examine the reasons for their victories and for their defeats in order to avoid the latter” (The prince, XIV), but he should also devote himself to the military operations and preserve power distinctly, and not to mention defeat or eradicate possible threats such as political conflicts and potential enemies.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In turn, he thinks that some vices, although viewed negatively, are for the greater good of the government. For example, Machiavelli writes that reputation should be a high priority for a good prince. He advises, “Whenever it happens that some one does something extraordinary, either good or evil, in civil life, he must find such means of rewarding or punishing him which will be much talked about,” (The Prince And the Discourses, 82). Even if something bad happens, Machiavelli believes a prince should find a way to manipulate the situation by gossiping and garnering attention to improve his reputation. He makes it clear that reputation is more important than the quality of leadership.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In one section of the article, Vincent Barnett discusses some of the alternative ways that Machiavelli’s The Prince can be interpreted. One interpretation was that Machiavelli possibly intended for his writing to be satirical, because certain facts, such as how Machiavelli had a family, refute his statement from the pamphlet that he believes all humans are evil. Also, it is possible that Machiavelli didn’t actually agree with the ideas in his writing, but he only wrote those things to gain favor from the leaders of his time. These are just possibilities, but knowing about Machiavelli’s life and his situation are important in order to understand his motives for writing The Prince. Just like Machiavelli, present-day leaders and authors make…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Italian cities, there was much conflict and arguments amongst the Borgia family who were focused on trying to seize and maintain power. Machiavelli in response, devised a text, The Prince, which illustrates how to run an effectual government. In The Prince, he also describes how the good and effective rulers have to learn “not to be good,” and that they have to be prepared and willing to put aside ethical concerns of justice and kindness, in order to preserve the balance of the state. This logic was atrocious to peers around him, for they were used to the old medieval ideas of ruling where the king was chosen by God to serve as someone on earth, who manages the law. They also saw that the ruler/king was an all-powerful human being with…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Written in the excerpt from The Morals of the Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli, being a political philosopher of the Renaissance, analyzes the ideal qualities and the real qualities of princes. According to his excerpt, paragraph seven lies under the subtitle “On Cruelty and Clemency: Whether It Is Better To Be Loved or Feared”. Base on the subtitle, it can be inferred that the following sections will discuss whether a prince should be loved or feared by his people. In paragraph seven of the excerpt, the author states the following: “to be feared is much safer than to be loved.” As stated in the quote, Machiavelli believes that a prince should rule his people with fear because love has harmful consequences.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By stating this Machiavelli is saying if a prince is to caring they will be taken advantage of where if they were to be feared they would be remembered as a power that maintains order. It is from there that he goes on providing examples of how fear is to be more advantageous for a prince as the princes subjects that he spoke of stayed loyal from which he then concludes his piece proclaiming without the doubt that fear is better than love. In that, proving that Machiavelli believing a prince must be feared to maintain power and keep society going shows that Machiavelli…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Princess Barbarism Quotes

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the reading we find out how she is jealous of others because she sees them as a threat. "It was one of the loveliest of the damsels of the court who had been selected as the reward of the accused youth, should he be proved innocent of the crime of aspiring to one so far above him; and the princess hated her" (Paragraph 14, 3). This quote shows how the princess is jealous of the maiden and that entire quote is filled with hatred. "The girl was lovely, but she had dared to raise her eyes to the loved one of the princess; and, with all the intensity of the savage blood transmitted to her through long lines of wholly barbaric ancestors, she hated the woman who blushed and trembled behind that silent door" (Paragraph 14, 3). This passage suggests how jealous the princess really can be while thinking about her boyfriend with someone else.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli was a historian and deeply involved himself in politics, and he wrote his Discourses on Livy with a desire to bring back the virtues of the ancient Roman republic and in the hopes that they could be applied to Italy in the 16th century. The Discourses is a more honest take on Machiavelli’s true political beliefs than what is outlined in his famous, and much more widely read, The Prince. At the time of writing it, the Medici family were in full power, and Rousseau stated after reading his book, “Machiavelli was a proper man and a good citizen; but, being attached to the court of the Medici, he could not help veiling his love of liberty in the midst of his country's oppression.” Which would explain the contrasting ideals brought forth between The Prince and his Discourses.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Machiavelli writes on how a prince is to take power and how to maintain his position (Ryan, 2012, p.364). The concept of virtù is introduced, as an essential component that a prince must possess. It could be translated as the ability, quality or determination that secures political success (Ryan, 2012, p.375). Machiavelli finds an example of a virtuous prince in Cesare Borgia, described as a skillful leader who was only defeated by the negative effects of fortuna (Ryan, 2012, p.371). On the other hand, Agathocles is presented as a tyrant, whose form of ruling was dishonorable.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli’s Prince seeks to recruit and educate a ruler in the art of ruling. His ideal rulers are founders, men who created a fatherland and were not afraid to sacrifice lives and their self-interests for the common good. Machiavelli stresses that a ruler needs to appear virtuous while using vices when necessary to achieve positive results. Machiavelli teaches the ruler to divide his self. “It is essential, therefore, for a Prince […] to have learned how to be other than good, and to use or not use his goodness as necessity requires” (Machiavelli, 40).…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ledeen wrote, “All manner of nastiness may be required to keep us under control (p.90).” Machiavelli says that a leader may have to “enter into evil” in order to balance the threat of human nature (p.93). It is comments like this that make Machiavelli both feared and admired, the very thing Machiavelli suggests a prince should strive for…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many leaders follow the ideology that in order to win the battle for power, and keep that power, it will require force, deception, manipulation, and coercion. Thus, another reason why many leaders abuse their power is because they think that they have to be cruel in order to stand and prevail in brutal battles for power. This is particularly true when we reference to the long history of corruption in European Monarchs. Mary I of England was cruel, deceptive, forceful, and carried out many things by coercion. Similarly, Ivan the Terrible of Russia did not care, and did not need to care for the well-being of his people.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays